So she kept pointing out how Jesus submits to the Father. Ok. Got it. So therefore... we submit to Jesus, and do what... ?? Follow his commands, beginning with his greatest commandment, love.
The thing with JWs is that they view "Jehovah" as the ultimate authority. Ok. That's fine. No issue there. But they also take the OT viewpoint of Jehovah "exacting exclusive devotion". Therein lies the big problem. When God exalted Jesus, this view changed. God made a covenant with Jesus and basically put Jesus in charge. He's the King. He's has "all authority in heaven and on earth." Does Jesus submit to the Father? Absolutely. But who are WE supposed to submit to?
Let's use an OT account and a NT passage to show this.
In the OT, Joseph became second in command of Egypt. Note what Pharaoh told Joseph. Genesis 19:39-44:
Phar′aoh then said to Joseph: “Since God has caused you to know all of this, there is no one as discreet and wise as you. You will personally be over my house, and all my people will obey you implicitly. Only in my role as king will I be greater than you.” And Phar′aoh added to Joseph: “See, I am putting you over all the land of Egypt.” Then Phar′aoh removed his signet ring from his own hand and put it on Joseph’s hand and clothed him with garments of fine linen and placed a necklace of gold around his neck. Moreover, he had him ride in the second chariot of honor that he had, and they would call out ahead of him, “A·vrékh!” Thus he put him over all the land of Egypt. Phar′aoh further said to Joseph: “I am Phar′aoh, but without your authorization, no man may do a single thing in all the land of Egypt.”
What do you think Pharaoh would do if people tried to do an end run around Joseph? Now, WTBTS likens Pharaoh to Jehovah and Joseph to Jesus, calling them "the Greater Pharaoh" and "the Greater Joseph" respectively. In all likelihood, Pharaoh would be quite annoyed if people tried to do an end run around Pharaoh. Don't you think Jehovah would be annoyed, too?
In the NT, there is a chain of command that is outlined. 1 Cor 3:21-23:
So let no one boast in men; for all things belong to you, whether Paul or A·pol′los or Ce′phas or the world or life or death or things now here or things to come, all things belong to you; in turn you belong to Christ; Christ, in turn, belongs to God.
So, it's pretty clearly outlined who belongs to whom here.
I'm reminded of the Star Trek episode where Picard gets captured by the Borg. Commander Shelby, this hot-shot commander, wants her idea to be heard by the captain. Command Riker doesn't like her idea, but assures her he will take it to the captain. As he walks into the captain's office, he finds Shelby sitting, already having talked to the captain about her idea. As they leave, Riker is pretty annoyed, and in the turbo-lift, he tells Shelby:
"You disagree with me, fine. You need to take it to the Captain, fine - through me. You do an end run around me again, I'll snap you back so hard you'll think you're a first-year cadet again."
Basically, this is how the arrangement between Christ and the Father is supposed to be.