SnowQueen: okay, lets just take your first major claim, " pretty much every major war since the French Revolution has been started on false pretences ". Lets just take WW2. The "official" causes from wikipedia is:
The main causes of World War II were nationalistic tensions, unresolved issues, and resentments resulting from the World War I and the interwar periodin Europe, plus the effects of the Great Depression in the 1930s.
The culmination of events that led to the outbreak of war are generally understood to be the 1939 invasion of Poland by Germany and Soviet Russia and the 1937 invasion of the Republic of China by the Empire of Japan.
These military aggressions were the result of decisions made by the authoritarian ruling Nazi elite in Germany and by the leadership of the Kwantung Armyin Japan. World War II started after these aggressive actions were met with an official declaration of war and/or armed resistance.
So I guess we can both agree the above is all factually accurate, but I understand you to say the above is not the cause at all. What exactly do you suggest, what is your evidence and which sources did you investigate which was critical of that conclusion?
Wrote bohm,
Whilst I cannot write a whole book here and the historical references of such, I will give you a few snippets that if you are genuinely interested, rather than just wishing to maintain the current world view you have been indoctrinated with, you can do further research at your own time and expense, for there are indeed lots of history books that back SnowQueens claims.
The first world war wasnt "won" by Britain and her allies by millitary means, but by deciept. A laying down of arms was suggested called the Armastice and the 14 point plan, Germany laid down her arms first, but then, and as we did with the Arabs over Palestine, we decieved Germany and as soon as She was unarmed, we didnt uphold our part of the bargain with the 14 point plan, but imposed the horrific Treaty of Versaillies on her, which incidently, the likes of David Lloyd George and I belive Woodrow Wilson claimed was far too harsh and would lead to the problems it did.
It was reported by David Lloyd George that 120 international bankers ruled over the proccedings at Versaillies, "with the absolute authority of Monarchs" rev 17 v v 18.
One result of the treaty of Versaillies is the huge proportion of Germany that was taken from her and given to surrounding nations whilst still inhabitated by Germans, West Prussia being given to Poland a prime example, if you go on Amazon and search for the book, "Orphans of Versaillies" by Richard Blanke you will find a source of reference showing Polands delberate ethnic cleansing methods of West Prussia to drive the Prussians out so it could be taken over purly by Poles, I see this book, which I have, now costs £71 second hand so wouldnt expect you to purchace it.
What I can report is that My family, on my Fathers side, is West Prussian, and personaly experienced being driven out by the Poles and losing our Horse farm. Later on, the persecution got worst and worst until manifesting itself in the form of murder and a certain government official, calling for the castration of all German men in order to rid Poland of what was now an ethnic minority.
All the above however, whilst giving Hitler a good and legitimate excuse to invade Poland, was not used, in fact he volunteered accepting the new borders and letting Poland keep West Prussia, all he wanted from Poland was a rail route to East Prussia, and the free city of Danzig, which was 98% German, to be allowed to rejoin Germany, oh, and he wanted a treaty with Poland against the threat of Russia and communism.
However, on the allies side, we have this, Winston Churchill, and Lord Halifax, stating as far back as 1933 that Germany must be destroyed before it becomes too powerfull, you could buy yourself a book on Churchills speeches to see who the driving force behind WW2 was.
International Jewry declared war on Germany in 1933, Google "Jews declare war on Germany".
Churchill, who was outspokenly anti-semetic as the rest of them, certainly switched sides once a Jewish banker paid off his gambling debts.
Now Poland, which was described by one British historian as a Canary that keeps trying to eat two cats, (Germany and Russia), has notions of the establishment of a greater Poland going all the way to Berlin, Britain, France and America gave assurances to Poland that if there was ever military action between Germany and Poland, Britian would give Poland a "blank cheque", Poland then, armed with such backing and the overconfidence in her own military, was used by the West to push Hitler into the war that he didnt want, and tried on numerous occassions to avoid, but that the West did want.
Poland, in order to provoke war, was blockading and starving the people of Danzig, they gave Germany the warning that if she even tried to provide food for Danzig, it would be taken as millitary action and lead to war.
Like I say, I cannot write a book here, but there is enough material to do so, all pointing to the same group of people who do not want any country to grow strong that they do not control.
You can see the West using exactly the same tactics now on the Middle East where they arm insurgents in Libya and Syria, encourage them to attack their governments, and then use said governments defence as an Propogander device as the excuse to go to war and take yet another country under the control of the international bankers or Babylon the Great.
