Are you saying that the fact (that the survey is biased) is over-weighted by the possibility that it will affect people who might come out of the WT organization?
If so, that means that the survey is really propaganda - not accurate data. I do not understand this kind of logic, and I do not believe that such shenanigans actually help honest people to exit the Watchtower. We should always be honest in our approach - as honest as we can be. At the very least, the survey should carry a disclaimer which makes it clear that the main rank file of the JW population were not equally represented. James my point is that all of the websights mentioned will be viewed as "biased" anti watchtower propaganda by some viewers. However they all have value to the casual internet researcher or JW that is looking for information. Most researchers know that these websites are going to be motivated by an agenda to expose the Watchtower and therefore likely to be "biased" Reading through the questions posed on JWSurvey alone is enough to start someone on the path of learning the TTATT whether they participate and hit the send button or not, many of whom are no doubt Rank and File. Reveiwing material from any of the other sites can have the same affect. We are also talking about faders or fringe JWs seeking out these websights. Many of them stuck in the cult for decades? How honest was their approach while they were practicing cognitive dissonance? The fact they even look at these sites shows they are now trying to take an honest approach to their belief system.