Can someone please explain the relevance? (I am not a US citizen, and I don't follow all the news there.)
As far as I can make out:
- Susan Rice was the "National Security Adviser".
- She receives "raw intelligence reports" (apparently "dozens", according to the linked article) of conversations between one or more foreign governments and one or more US individuals, whose name is/are redacted from the reports.
- The US individuals(s) were not the target of the electronic eavesdropping; the foreign government(s) was/were.
- She requests the name(s) of the US individuals(s). (Reading between the lines, the US individuals(s) is/are members of the Trump team.)
- Her request happened after the election but before the inauguration. However, it related to earlier eavesdropping, going back to before Trump was the formal Republican nominee.
What has Susan Rice done wrong? It seems to me she has done exactly what a National Security Advisor should do, in this instance.
I am just asking. I haven't commented on other Trump threads, and I don't want to be part of any broader debate.