original reddit post (removed).
These screenshots were handed into the police in 2017. Nothing could be done. So, what has come out that we are not privvy to, in relation to these screenshots that the police now have?
Were they? I was under the impression these recent screenshots were new. The only thing I heard about back in the day was something "Marko" said on a facebook group.
original reddit post (removed).
A question that's important to ask:
If these chats / emails turn out to be false, who benefits?
Certainly not the VAA or Mike & Kim. They've staked their reputation on these documents being authentic.
So who would ultimately benefit from this fabrication? What would the prevailing narrative be in the aftermath of such a reveal?
Think about that.
original reddit post (removed).
NE: Those are screenshots, NOT emails that Dijana sent to her cousin.
Screenshots from what program though? In 2008, I don’t know of any email program that looked like that threading style at all. Not outlook or Apple mail, and certainly not gmail.
That’s one thing that gets my spidey senses tingling.
On the other hand, I also don't know of a single email faking website that has that look and feel either.
Any other old school internet users recognize that format?
original reddit post (removed).
It should be mentioned that the JLE email address in these screenshots would have had to be created between April 2004 and October 2005. In the UK, between October 2005 and sometime in 2010, all new gmail accounts were using googlemail.com as their domain address due to a dispute with another company.
original reddit post (removed).
If anyone is having issues with downloading those pics from that website, as I was, someone else has uploaded a PDF with all the same screenshots in order with dates. Hosted on the blockchain, so very resistant to censorship or removal.
original reddit post (removed).
“Misinformation”
ugh. Here we go.
original reddit post (removed).
Adding unproven gossip to the list makes us look bad.
It’s still unexplained to me why he claims in that same video about his judicial meeting, that he has damaging information for the Croatia branch that he’s going to use as a bargaining chip.
If you’re presenting yourself as this activist that’s trying to bring down an organization, why do you hide damaging information about one of their branches?
Unless, perhaps, it’s not just damaging to the branch and may be damaging to you too?
original reddit post (removed).
"I'm not comfortable with what Lloyd has done to his wife, but he's imperfect and his videos have helped thousands of people!"
vs
“I don’t like how the society has handled Child Sexual Abuse in the organization, but they are imperfect men and the message is life saving!”
Same energy.
lloyd's twitter statement this morning states:.
today photos are being circulated that djana disclosed privately to someone she assumed to be a trusted friend.
i want to make it clear that the woman in the photos is in her 20s and not a sex worker.
I'm sure there are restaurants where he lives that are in need of dishwashers. That's about all the employment he will get from now on.
I was just thinking about that today. When I have a candidate I’m interested in hiring, I always Google their name to see if any red flags surface. This is common practice with hiring managers.
I don’t know anyone that would hire someone in a professional environment that has the digital footprint Lloyd Evans is going to have in relation to Thai prostitution.
The dude has very few career options now.
lloyd's twitter statement this morning states:.
today photos are being circulated that djana disclosed privately to someone she assumed to be a trusted friend.
i want to make it clear that the woman in the photos is in her 20s and not a sex worker.
Could someone DM the photo? Reddit is a labyrinth!
It's on this thread here:
