views it as a chance to put some "competition" out of business.
That I agree with.
original reddit post (removed).
original reddit post (removed).
He doesn’t want that livestream submitted into evidence and only wants to focus chiefly on Kim’s statement and other information given on her interviews.
I agree with a lot of your points however I checked the document lloyd put out and in Jonathan’s section he refers to Jonathan’s interview with me and from memory there are a few small clips from the livestream - but do y quote me, I would have to check.
original reddit post (removed).
original reddit post (removed).
original reddit post (removed).
original reddit post (removed).
I think LoveUniHateExams has it right re: misogyny. Lloyd calls Kim all sorts of names, while Andrew Gold and AltWorldly get described as having been led astray or manipulated by Kim.
LoveUniHateExams certainly puts up a reasonable opinion. I appreciate they they and you are prepared to speak out about this, I know that some are intimidated and scared of being shouted down, which i also understand 💗
original reddit post (removed).
I just can't see how Lloyd's lawyer will think he's got a case, after reviewing this thread and others.
I appreciate your opinion, I have be been asking myself this same questions for quite a while now.
I will note, it’s one thing to lodge civil proceedings against someone in order to defend your personal reputation as lloyd has previously stated.
It’s a whole other thing when he seeks cooperation from the court in commencing criminal proceedings against someone.
I can only assume that perhaps his lawyer is not aware of the entire facts and evidence to this case. 🤷♀️ Otherwise it makes no sense to me.
original reddit post (removed).
original reddit post (removed).
original reddit post (removed).