original reddit post (removed).
Who says this is just in his past? Did he ever say anything about stopping?
FYI Derek,
In fact, he proposed to continue on visiting sex workers to Dijana as part of his “moving forward” plan with her. He had no intentions of stopping and based on previous behaviour I do not believe he has stopped. With Dijana or without her - he was going to continue.
He can add this to the litigation if he wants, I have it in writing so I’ll be happy to provide that document to the court to prove this fact.
original reddit post (removed).
don't worry we ALL have your back
Thank you x
original reddit post (removed).
Thank you to some very kind supporting messages from posters above, I really appreciate the kind words. 💜
original reddit post (removed).
Have you or anyone sent a similar letter as the one you sent to his attorney to Patreon,
Hi Derek 👋 letters have been sent to patreon, I’ll check and see what the content of the letters were and may forward my letter on to someone in contact with patreon.
original reddit post (removed).
Wife is on twitter and was mentioning that they've been pretty supportive of Lloyd throughout this, she saw where Dave said something about people being critical of Lloyd and that he didn't want an xJW "civil war."
Sounds like familiar rhetoric….muddies the waters doesn’t it, prevents people looking into the reality ….
original reddit post (removed).
FROM PAGE 615:
@Kim Silvio (sorry, don't know how to actually tag, if someone knows how to get her attention):
I have a question about that stupid lawsuit Lloyd thinks he's filing. He admitted to soliciting prostitutes on his livestream, which is a crime. He says he didn't go to Thailand purposely for solicitation but I'm sure a good prosecutor could make a case for sex tourism.
This attorney he hired asked for money to make the case go away, right?
The attorney asked for money as compensation for the “damages” alleged to have been done to his client as a result of my disclosure. There was no promise that the case would go away, however he also requested that I issue an apology also,and remove all the alleged defamatory material. This, in my opinion, is what Lloyd really wanted. It is my opinion that he was trying to bully his way through the mess as it would appear that he has done on many occasions previously.
So my question is, how is that not witness tampering, or extortion?
Attorney’s hold certain rights (in most countries I assume). I don’t know the laws in Croatia however in most western countries an attorney could be subject to extortion charges if they fail to gather any facts or information that would support a claim being lodged. Malice would also need to be proven amongst all of the other elements of extortion.
I personally don’t believe that extortion is an issue in this situation. An attorney’s advice and actions are only as good as the information given to them by their client.
Lloyd did something illegal and you're reporting on it, not necessarily to authorities but you can make the argument that any web user or blogger acts as a news reporter and that you could be a witness to his confession if he was ever charged with that crime. Trying to silence someone from reporting on a crime or someone who might be a witness in a future criminal case sounds like a crime itself.
I do not believe that witness tampering is an issue in this case, however depending on the jurisdiction and the specifics of the laws, it could be an argument. As Lloyd is the prosecutor, I have no idea how that would work, as it would usually be the prosecution who lodges complaints regarding witness tampering. The claim hadn’t been lodged either at the time the letter was issued so I don’t think a claim of witness tampering would be considered.
Demanding money from someone reporting on a crime sounds like extortion, or something similar...?
Especially since there has been no formal information sent to the “defendants”, the whole thing sounds bonkers…..
Has anyone thought to send that back to whatever attorney he hired and tell them that they need to rescind that letter or you'll report them to whatever group oversees attorney conduct in their area?
I did send a letter back to Lloyd’s attorneys and tried to speak to them on the phone however I did not receive any correspondence from his attorneys at all (today is the 3rd of November 2022 and still nothing). A copy of my correspondence can be found here https://www.keepandshare.com/doc30/113177/copy-redacted-pdf-848k
I'm no lawyer obviously but thought I'd just toss that out there, food for thought.
Always good to hear other peoples thoughts.
original reddit post (removed).
A few posts ago you wrote: @Kim Silvio (sorry, don't know how to actually tag,
if someone knows how to get her attention):
Thank your for all the support and common sense you have brought to the whole LE situation, I appreciate your’s and everyone else’s support so much.
You have raised an extremely important and interesting question/comment that I want to answer properly with references etc - I’m away from my computer atm but will respond again asap.
Again, thank you to everyone who contributes to this thread and who continue to call out the hypocrisy and behavior of someone taking advantage of vulnerable people 💗
original reddit post (removed).
P.S. Hi Kim. Am I to understand that neither Evans' inlaws nor his wife give him a "prostitute allowance"?
Hey vintage 👋 I am pretty sure it’s safe to say that neither parties gave him a “prostitution allowance” 😂😂
original reddit post (removed).
Only afterwards, when the realization hit that his patrons might not see it the same way, did anyone try to make it seem as if he only used other funds to pay for sex.
My statement was “funds generated through activism” His income is generated through activism work - he has no other income sources ie there are no “other” funds
https://e-predmet.pravosudje.hr/print.php?sud=5044&upisnik=k&predmet=252&godina=2022&captcha_code=z6cnlb.
happy if simon wants to incorporate this link into the cedars post, i just could t make it post there and vintage was asking for it .
