Nothing James Lloyd Evans says/does surprises me anymore
My favourite question that lloyd side stepped was whether prostitution was illegal in Croatia šš
original reddit post (removed).
Nothing James Lloyd Evans says/does surprises me anymore
My favourite question that lloyd side stepped was whether prostitution was illegal in Croatia šš
original reddit post (removed).
as well as another particular kink Iām not at liberty to reveal.
Iām going to speculate here and propose that Mr Evans perhaps prefers āGreekā style sex š¤·āāļøš¤·āāļø
original reddit post (removed).
Please just change the record, I'm yawning.
You donāt have to read this thread if itās that boring you know šš
original reddit post (removed).
LMAO, while you lot are sitting around wasting your time watching EVERY movement of LE, he is actually enjoying life. How many years did you waste on WT, 30 years for me, and now you keep on wasting it on an ex-JW. Go figure........
How do you know he is enjoying his life? You should never assess a persons ārealityā based on the āhighlight reelā of social media š
original reddit post (removed).
I do not believe in the left/right paradigm, as it is yet another cult-like ideology that is designed to divide.
This is a very interesting comment - Iām firmly in the āI donāt even understand this shitā when it comes to left and right and politics HOWEVER as a casual observer, I have noticed the black and white, defend to the end, if your not with me your dead to me culture that is created by the paradigm ā¦.. and yes it is cultyā¦..why canāt people just get informed and make their own decisions ā¦. You make a very interesting point !
original reddit post (removed).
original reddit post (removed).
but is it the same in Croatian law?
Well thatās an interesting question. It is different yes, as in the āperpetratorā has to convince the court that the true facts were made for legitimate reason. Lloyd must inform the court of exactly what isnāt true and why they arenāt true.
Article 6 of the ECHR states that:
It is a human right of the EU that anyone accused of a criminal offense is innocent until proven guilty. Croatia cannot therefore place the burden of proof entirely upon a ādefendantā to prove they arenāt guilty.
I thought Iād throw this in also:
āAliensā = M7
Question for each to work out for themselves:
Is the act of ācriminal defamationā a ācriminal offenceā at the locations of where the M7 committed the ācrimesā?
original reddit post (removed).
Poor Novosel office.
I donāt think they realised what kind of client they had. I understand that they are no longer representing him however again, I havenāt received form as l notification.
original reddit post (removed).
This case is so weak and insane that Iād imagine the Croatian government would take measures to shut this case down and have it dismissed should a judge be foolish enough to serve parties overseas.
I am informed that the Croatian court has already refused once to issue subpoenas for this court case, however Iāve not been informed formally. I wonder how many years he is going to spin this bullshitā¦..kinda reminds me of WT and their āArmageddonā fantasy.
Croatian law allows a citizen to make this complaint directly to the court instead of the police. The court then makes a determination whether or not a crime occurred with evidence which makes it worth prosecuting, like the police normally do.This is my understanding yes. Again, Iāve been informally advised that the court have yet to be convinced that there is a case to answer.
original reddit post (removed).
For the record I will say this again. Lloyd is claiming that he has commenced criminal proceedings against the M7. There is sufficient evidence to demonstrate that he has petitioned the court for the commencement HOWEVER until anyone is formally and legally served with a summons (or equivalent), no one is a defendant. There is currently nothing to defend.
Regarding the burden of proof - in a criminal proceeding it is not the defendantās responsibility to prove innocence, it is the prosecutions responsibility to prove the crime. Imagine any court system in the world where a prosecutor can say ā you murdered xā and forcing the defendant to prove a negativeā¦.Iām not saying anyone murdered anyone just to be clear - what I am saying that both ācrimesā are within the ācriminalā designation and therefore have the same burden of proof. The responsibility is with Lloyd to prove his case. I would have thought that if his case was so certain, we would either have been served or he would have plastered the evidence across the internet.
Finally, Lloyd cannot get a conviction in any country - including Croatia - without the M7 knowing. The court will require evidence that each party is aware of the proceeding prior to hearing the case, whether the M7 are represented or not.
So here is something yo add to your defamation complaints Lloyd:
You are a pig of a man, you have damaged the activism movement and you are a shameless grifter who should be ashamed of himself.