KIMSILVIO

Joined

• started 4 topics
• posted 932 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by KIMSILVIO

• 
  19

  Toasting

  by hoser in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  when did the jws make the rule that you couldn’t clink glasses together and raise glasses of wine?.

  and why the change to being a conscience matter now?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  KIMSILVIO

  The “governing body” after deep prayer thought it was such a serious matter that it needed to be changed, but not the two witness rule, reporting csa, shunning, mental health and so many more things….ffs that’s sickening
• 
  24

  The JW's are suing Mark O'Donnell in civil court for millions.So protect the pedos, and suit the whistelblowers? Shame on this cult!

  by WingCommander in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  link to his announcement on www.jwchildabuse.org:.

  https://www.jwchildabuse.org/news/jehovahs-witnesses-sue-editor-of-jw-child-abuse-website-for-millions/.

  if anyone needed any further proof of how low and despicable this cult has become, here's more evidence.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  KIMSILVIO

  private events which are publicised in the media

  Most countries have laws that identify where a person reasonably can expect to have privacy (ie in their own homes, public restrooms, doctors offices, lawyers, medical providers etc). If a private event is held in a public place, a person could lose their “reasonable expectation of privacy”. 👍
• 
  24

  The JW's are suing Mark O'Donnell in civil court for millions.So protect the pedos, and suit the whistelblowers? Shame on this cult!

  by WingCommander in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  link to his announcement on www.jwchildabuse.org:.

  https://www.jwchildabuse.org/news/jehovahs-witnesses-sue-editor-of-jw-child-abuse-website-for-millions/.

  if anyone needed any further proof of how low and despicable this cult has become, here's more evidence.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  KIMSILVIO

  On the one hand it seems reasonable that people have a right not to have their private conversations recorded. On the other hand if it uncovers illegality or serious hypocrisy that others should know about is there a justification for it?

  You seem to understand the question quite well 👍 WT say that he was not a “party” to the meeting as he was not invited, they didn’t know he was there etc and therefore did not waive legal privilege (the meeting was with two attorneys and elders from each of the 11 congregations) and did not consent to him recording. They claim that both parties had to consent to recording as required by the relevant USA law. They claim that he shared information on a YouTube video that could only have been learnt from that meeting.

  Mark contends that he was invited therefore hasn’t done anything wrong. He contends that he isn’t subject to the two party consent law they referenced. He also contends that most of the information that he shared was learnt prior to the meeting. Some of this section is redacted so it’s hard to understand what was known and what wasn’t.

  My personal opinion: if someone recorded the meeting and gave it to him as a journalist and he reported on it, this claim would have been complete bs.

  If a person breaks the law to obtain information that is reported publicly, I think it’s wrong as it gives scumbags like WT the ability to “sing from the rooftops” if they win.

  I will be interested to see what the court determines. I hope the court rules against WT, but we shall have to wait and see.
• 
  24

  The JW's are suing Mark O'Donnell in civil court for millions.So protect the pedos, and suit the whistelblowers? Shame on this cult!

  by WingCommander in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  link to his announcement on www.jwchildabuse.org:.

  https://www.jwchildabuse.org/news/jehovahs-witnesses-sue-editor-of-jw-child-abuse-website-for-millions/.

  if anyone needed any further proof of how low and despicable this cult has become, here's more evidence.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  KIMSILVIO

  According to the documents he was invited by a person who was invited to the meeting. There will be fine print in emails to consider, or a lack of fine print etc. There are so many things that need to be considered by the court.
• 
  24

  The JW's are suing Mark O'Donnell in civil court for millions.So protect the pedos, and suit the whistelblowers? Shame on this cult!

  by WingCommander in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  link to his announcement on www.jwchildabuse.org:.

  https://www.jwchildabuse.org/news/jehovahs-witnesses-sue-editor-of-jw-child-abuse-website-for-millions/.

  if anyone needed any further proof of how low and despicable this cult has become, here's more evidence.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  KIMSILVIO

  I hate WT and specifically their legal department. I also make no bones about Mark and my issues. I have read the available documents and can see points for Mark and I can see issues that he needs to deal with. It’s a complex issue and I will wait for the trial so all the facts and evidence can be presented.
  I do not think it’s a case of WT going after Mark to shut him up. I think they are taking advantage of an opportunity that presented itself to them.
  
  
  
• 
  3172

  It's been a long 9 years Lloyd Evans / John Cedars (continued)

  by Simon in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  uh oh, looks like the mega thread gave up the ghost, so while i investigate / fix it just continue the discussion here .... it's been a long 9 years lloyd evans / john cedars.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  KIMSILVIO

  The case was dead before it opened. It’s not closed but he has done nothing since June last year because he knows the case is dead. This case could (and probably will) sit there until 2028 as the court will not close for failure to prosecute until 6 years from the date of the incident. Lloyd knows this. What others think about this, what people think of Lloyd, what people think was his motivation for lodging this, whether his (and other) actions were an attempt to intimidate people into silence is up to each person. What can never change and never will are the facts.

  My intention was to provide information so that current and future members of our community could be informed and make a decision for themselves. Every single time I get an email notification that someone has accessed the legal documents that put on my file share, I feel a sense of calm that I did the right thing.
• 
  3172

  It's been a long 9 years Lloyd Evans / John Cedars (continued)

  by Simon in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  uh oh, looks like the mega thread gave up the ghost, so while i investigate / fix it just continue the discussion here .... it's been a long 9 years lloyd evans / john cedars.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  KIMSILVIO

  My worldview has just been shattered.

  😂😂
• 
  3172

  It's been a long 9 years Lloyd Evans / John Cedars (continued)

  by Simon in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  uh oh, looks like the mega thread gave up the ghost, so while i investigate / fix it just continue the discussion here .... it's been a long 9 years lloyd evans / john cedars.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  KIMSILVIO

  Maybe Lloyd can immigrate to Australia

  No thank you very much!!!
• 
  3

  Meet up?

  by KIMSILVIO in

  1. jw
  2. experiences

  hi 👋 .

  just wanted to leave a message saying hi 👋 i’m going to england in november, if anyone wants to catch up or organise a meet up with me, let me know via dm or twitter dm .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  KIMSILVIO

  London mostly …..Lloyd’s lawyers can bite me 😂😂 as for his dad….i disassociated so it would be thoughtless of me to infect his spiritual righteousness 😂😂
• 
  3

  Meet up?

  by KIMSILVIO in

  1. jw
  2. experiences

  hi 👋 .

  just wanted to leave a message saying hi 👋 i’m going to england in november, if anyone wants to catch up or organise a meet up with me, let me know via dm or twitter dm .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  KIMSILVIO

  Hi 👋

  Just wanted to leave a message saying hi 👋 I’m going to England in November, if anyone wants to catch up or organise a meet up with me, let me know via dm or Twitter dm