Posts by scholar

posted

178
Interesting Find with Chronology
by Kelley959 in
1. watchtower
2. beliefs
i hope this is in the right area.

i've been studying the 2520 days/years 607/587/586 debacle.

for a while now i have felt 1914 was wrong.
scholar

Jeffro
People respond to JW chronology (and other JW-related issues) because JW beliefs are incorrect and result in harm, not because you’re ‘doing something right’ - that’s just your persecution complex.
---
Did not Jesus say that his disciples would be persecuted so it cannot be a complex? People respond to our teachings including our wondrous Chronology because they believe these to be true and correct.
---
It doesn’t actually take that much of my time but the fact that you think it’s an obsession suggests you feel threatened.
---
Hardly so because both of us are obsessed with Chronology.
178
Interesting Find with Chronology
by Kelley959 in
1. watchtower
2. beliefs
i hope this is in the right area.

i've been studying the 2520 days/years 607/587/586 debacle.

for a while now i have felt 1914 was wrong.
scholar

Jeffro
Hahaha 🤣 JW chronology is well and truly refuted. I provide information for people who have been subject to JW propaganda whose access to other information is often limited. In the broader community, JW chronology is an irrelevance and is not considered remotely plausible by any independent historian or scholar.
--
Ha Ha. We must be doing something right because so many websites have been developed with many scholarships in order to refute our Chronology which like your good self amounts to an obsession. Perhaps many people detect a 'ring of truth'.
178
Interesting Find with Chronology
by Kelley959 in
1. watchtower
2. beliefs
i hope this is in the right area.

i've been studying the 2520 days/years 607/587/586 debacle.

for a while now i have felt 1914 was wrong.
scholar

Jeffro
In your analogy, people who endorse JW chronology are more like anti-vaxxers.
Accepting JW chronology in the face of evidence to the contrary is not only detrimental in itself but also increases propensity for accepting other irrational ideas.
--
Sadly for you, there is no compelling evidence for refuting our Chronology but simply an array of different interpretations and methodologies hence the dispute and your obsession with the subject-WT Chronology.
178
Interesting Find with Chronology
by Kelley959 in
1. watchtower
2. beliefs
i hope this is in the right area.

i've been studying the 2520 days/years 607/587/586 debacle.

for a while now i have felt 1914 was wrong.
scholar

Jeffro
No, especially in the case of JW beliefs, that's the disease, not the cure.
--
Whatever it remains an object of criticism and study hence your obsession.
178
Interesting Find with Chronology
by Kelley959 in
1. watchtower
2. beliefs
i hope this is in the right area.

i've been studying the 2520 days/years 607/587/586 debacle.

for a while now i have felt 1914 was wrong.
scholar
Jeffro
- That's a bit like saying cancer is good because people research cancer.
  --
  Well, cancer and its cure are both objects of research providing a cure and other benefits as with Bible Chronology whatever its source- an object of study and research producing many benefits such as faith in Bible Prophecy etc.
  scholar JW
  
  Link Dislike Like
178
Interesting Find with Chronology
by Kelley959 in
1. watchtower
2. beliefs
i hope this is in the right area.

i've been studying the 2520 days/years 607/587/586 debacle.

for a while now i have felt 1914 was wrong.
scholar

Jeffro
Sure, that's why it's so highly regarded by actual historians, who regularly cite and endorse Watch Tower Society chronology. That's sarcasm by the way.
-
Your comment is immature and ignorant. There are many published Bible Chronologies for there is no one, uniformly accepted Bible Chronology for that is the nature of scholarship.
--
It sure is.
--
Another stupid and dumb comment, not worthy of you at all. All Chronologies are subject to criticism and it is as it should be including your scheme.
---
You are obsessed with WT Chronology as shown by your website so such obsession proves that our Chronology has substance as your pretty chart demonstrates.
scholar JW
178
Interesting Find with Chronology
by Kelley959 in
1. watchtower
2. beliefs
i hope this is in the right area.

i've been studying the 2520 days/years 607/587/586 debacle.

for a while now i have felt 1914 was wrong.
scholar

Jeffro.
It is up to you to interpret Stern for his description which remains problematic for scholars for this period as shown by various archaeologists having different interpretations of the state and nature of Judah during the period of Exile.
---
Since I've put together timelines presenting both the correct chronology and the JW chronology, I anticipate further confusion on your part given your propensity for garbling context.
--
Yes, and I would use both schemes together to show the current state of scholarship and the state of confusion common to Bible Chronology.
scholar JW
178
Interesting Find with Chronology
by Kelley959 in
1. watchtower
2. beliefs
i hope this is in the right area.

i've been studying the 2520 days/years 607/587/586 debacle.

for a while now i have felt 1914 was wrong.
scholar

johnamos
Where's the nonsense? The WTS clearly say that God's judgment on Babylon happen in 539.
“The idol-worshiping Babylonians now were in line for God’s judgment to be executed upon them. That happened in 539 B.C.E
--
Agreed. Babylon certainly received a judgement in 539 with its Fall but Jeremiah focussed on a more permanent judgement, one of desolation foretold from Jer.25: 12 onwards.
scholar JW
178
Interesting Find with Chronology
by Kelley959 in
1. watchtower
2. beliefs
i hope this is in the right area.

i've been studying the 2520 days/years 607/587/586 debacle.

for a while now i have felt 1914 was wrong.
scholar

Jeffro
The timeline actually demonstrates that WT chronology has no validity and is out by 20 years (extending to 68 years by Solomon's time) for purely dishonest reasons.
--
No. it is a Chronology with just as much validity as any others- worthy of criticism and careful which is what you are obsessed with namely WT Chronology. Your obsession with the subject demonstrates its validity, does it not?
---
Every time you try to 'defend' nonsensical WT chronology, you just come off looking dishonest and stupid. Good luck with that.
---
The said scholar has a thick skin!
scholar JW
178
Interesting Find with Chronology
by Kelley959 in
1. watchtower
2. beliefs
i hope this is in the right area.

i've been studying the 2520 days/years 607/587/586 debacle.

for a while now i have felt 1914 was wrong.
scholar

Jeffro
I did get around to reading COJ's book around 2015, many years after I had established the timeline for the period. The fact that my timeline shows WT chronology to be erroneous is largely the point, and the fact that it is consistent with secular historians and other honest individuals is only because it is correct.
Your claim not to have read COJ prior to 2015 is incredulous but whatever the case you must have come across information that was derived from COJ's research. Your timeline certainly shows the validity of JW Chronology and the fact that it is inconsistent with others is simply opinion which is common to scholarship where experts seldom agree.
scholar JW