Beth Sarim
Lloyd's Evan's video is simply a rehash of Carl Jonsson's hypothesis so there is nothing to see here as the said has refuted such view many times on this forum.
scholar JW
scholar
JoinedPosts by scholar
-
168
Awesome Video on debunking 1914!!!!! Follow it carefully to the end!!
by Beth Sarim ini don't know if anyone has stumbled across this video, but it just blew may away.
omg!!!
just goes to show why in dubland they adhere to the 2 witness rule so adamantly and are so anal about it.
-
-
-
168
Awesome Video on debunking 1914!!!!! Follow it carefully to the end!!
by Beth Sarim ini don't know if anyone has stumbled across this video, but it just blew may away.
omg!!!
just goes to show why in dubland they adhere to the 2 witness rule so adamantly and are so anal about it.
-
-
scholar
Finkelstein
Was it 586 BE the date preferred by scholars or was it 587 BCE the date preferred by Carl Olaf Jonsson?
-- that is your problem to resolve not mine
---
Irregardless the information from both secular (Archaeology) and the bible, weighs heavily in favor of either year, certainly not 607 BCE
------
No the Bible does not only weigh heavily on 607 BCE but it alone is the only possible date
----
Of course one has to insert themselves with intellectually honesty to draw that comprising conclusion.
--When you have resolved the 586/7 controversy then can you speak of intellectual honesty
scholar JW
-
168
Awesome Video on debunking 1914!!!!! Follow it carefully to the end!!
by Beth Sarim ini don't know if anyone has stumbled across this video, but it just blew may away.
omg!!!
just goes to show why in dubland they adhere to the 2 witness rule so adamantly and are so anal about it.
-
-
scholar
Finkelstein
You seemed to have skip over and be dismissive to the actual date/year of final destruction of Jerusalem which the WTS says it was 607 BCE. ???
----
No that is your problem for you do not exactly or precisely what year Jerusalem whether it was 586 or 587 BCE whereas WT has identified the exact year as 607 BCE and that is the very stark difference.
scholar JW
-
168
Awesome Video on debunking 1914!!!!! Follow it carefully to the end!!
by Beth Sarim ini don't know if anyone has stumbled across this video, but it just blew may away.
omg!!!
just goes to show why in dubland they adhere to the 2 witness rule so adamantly and are so anal about it.
-
-
scholar
Finkelstein
Interesting that the WTS takes only certain writings in the bible (Daniel's vision 70 years) to support their claim of 607 BCE but reject or dismiss all other pertaining scriptures
---
What a stupid statement to make for one only has to read WT publications in relation to the 70 years to see that we refer To Chronicles, Daniel. Jeremiah and Zechariah all these texts support fully our interpretation of the 70 years as a period of servitude-exile and desolation.
scholar JW
-
168
Awesome Video on debunking 1914!!!!! Follow it carefully to the end!!
by Beth Sarim ini don't know if anyone has stumbled across this video, but it just blew may away.
omg!!!
just goes to show why in dubland they adhere to the 2 witness rule so adamantly and are so anal about it.
-
-
scholar
Johnamos
if you are looking at the perspective of the 70 years then that could only have applied in Zedekiah's time ending his reign in 607 BCE.
If you discount the 70 years then Babylonish domination would have begun according to Dan 1:1 in the third year of his kingship during the reign of Jehoiakim when his vassalage to Neb would have commenced in 617 BCE.
Nice and easy
scholar JW
-
33
2020-06-26--Announcement and Outlines for July and August!
by Atlantis inannouncement:.
the following outlines should be presented in the christian life and ministry meeting during the dates specified below.
please assign a qualified elder to apply the material locally.
-
-
scholar
Atlantis
Please forward same to my pm inbox
Thanks
scholar
-
16
2020-July--S-147--English and German!
by Atlantis in2020-july-s-147-announcements and reminders.. english and german.. those on the email list have already received this.
if your not on the email list, reply below that you would like a link sent to your pm box.. petra!.
-
-
scholar
Atlantis
Please forward same to my pm inbox
Thanks
scholar
-
168
Awesome Video on debunking 1914!!!!! Follow it carefully to the end!!
by Beth Sarim ini don't know if anyone has stumbled across this video, but it just blew may away.
omg!!!
just goes to show why in dubland they adhere to the 2 witness rule so adamantly and are so anal about it.
-
-
scholar
johnamos
587
===
The majority opinion is 586?
====
How was Babylon dominating in 538 & 537 if it fell in 539?
====
Simple, because Babylonish domination over Judah only lasted until the Jews were released from servitude to Babylon under the new King of Babylon, King Cyrus in 537 BCE
-----
When did the 70 years for Tyre begin/end?
====
The history of Tyre in respects to this matter in unknown but it most likely occurred during the period from 607/606 BCE to 537/536 BCE.
scholar JW
-
168
Awesome Video on debunking 1914!!!!! Follow it carefully to the end!!
by Beth Sarim ini don't know if anyone has stumbled across this video, but it just blew may away.
omg!!!
just goes to show why in dubland they adhere to the 2 witness rule so adamantly and are so anal about it.
-
-
scholar
Johnamos
I wish you well in trying to, harmonize the regnal data by means of arithmetic. When you have finished this exercise then perhaps you can enlighten as to whether Jerusalem fell in 586 or 587 BCE?
scholar JW
-
168
Awesome Video on debunking 1914!!!!! Follow it carefully to the end!!
by Beth Sarim ini don't know if anyone has stumbled across this video, but it just blew may away.
omg!!!
just goes to show why in dubland they adhere to the 2 witness rule so adamantly and are so anal about it.
-
-
scholar
notsurewheretogo
Oh scholar...that is where you are going wrong.
Better be wrong with the Bible than right with false NB Chronology
scholar JW