i don't know if anyone has stumbled across this video, but it just blew may away.
omg!!!
just goes to show why in dubland they adhere to the 2 witness rule so adamantly and are so anal about it.
Mr. Finkelstein
Archeological findings have supported the bible's own writings and occurring events, so from both sources we can conclusively conclude that Jerusalem's destruction did not occur in 607 BCE
--
You express such dogmatism so my question to you is this: You claim that we can conclusively prove that Jerusalem's destruction did not occur in 607 BCE then what date for Jerusalem's destruction can you conclusively prove?
scholar JW
i don't know if anyone has stumbled across this video, but it just blew may away.
omg!!!
just goes to show why in dubland they adhere to the 2 witness rule so adamantly and are so anal about it.
Beth Sarim
When shown indisputable truths. Please explain the indisputable truth for a precise date for the Fall, is it 586 or 587 BCE ?
scholar JW
i don't know if anyone has stumbled across this video, but it just blew may away.
omg!!!
just goes to show why in dubland they adhere to the 2 witness rule so adamantly and are so anal about it.
Mr. Finkelstein
Your last encyclopedic post is a mixture of the GOOD, BAD and UGLY !!!!!!!!!!
scholar JW
i don't know if anyone has stumbled across this video, but it just blew may away.
omg!!!
just goes to show why in dubland they adhere to the 2 witness rule so adamantly and are so anal about it.
johnamos
Based on them saying 625 is his 4th year and the Scripture saying he reigned for 11 years…what years do you say are the correct years:
629-618 or 628- 617?
This is not a trick question, whatever one you say we will use it as our foundation
Neither. Jehoiakim reigned for about 11 years from 628-618 BCE and this is the best one can hope for.
scholar JW
i don't know if anyone has stumbled across this video, but it just blew may away.
omg!!!
just goes to show why in dubland they adhere to the 2 witness rule so adamantly and are so anal about it.
Anna Marina
Again your point? Bul is the eighth lunar month of the sacred calendar of the Israelites corresponding to the second month of the secular calendar. 1 Kings 6:37-38
scholar JW
i don't know if anyone has stumbled across this video, but it just blew may away.
omg!!!
just goes to show why in dubland they adhere to the 2 witness rule so adamantly and are so anal about it.
Anna Marina
Your point? Ziz is the name of the second lunar month od the sacred calendar, but the eighth of the secular calendar of the Israelites.
scholar JW
i don't know if anyone has stumbled across this video, but it just blew may away.
omg!!!
just goes to show why in dubland they adhere to the 2 witness rule so adamantly and are so anal about it.
johnamos
WTS says Jehoiakim’s ruled starting in 628 so that means his 3rd year was 625 and they say Neb began ruling in 625. Daniel was taken in 625 in Jehoiakim’s 3rd year, so Daniel was in Babylon to interpret the dream during Neb’s 2nd year as king
--
You misunderstand. Jehoiakim's reign was from 628-618 BCE and he was taken captive by Neb along with Daniel and others in 617 BCE which was in the 8th Neb's reign. Thus Neb's 2nd year of kingship must relate to something else such when he became World Ruler in 607 BCE because Jehoiakim was in his 4th year of his reign then not yet a vassal to Neb according to Dan 1:which occurred in Jehoiakim's third year of his kingship- Dan 1:1
Simply put it is important to properly synchronize the reigns of Jehoiakim and Nebuchadnezzar in harmony with both the Biblical history and secular history.
scholar JW
scholar JW
i don't know if anyone has stumbled across this video, but it just blew may away.
omg!!!
just goes to show why in dubland they adhere to the 2 witness rule so adamantly and are so anal about it.
Ann Maria
When discussing issues of calendation and the WT's use of it please remember that the Hebrew nation used two different calendars, one beginning in Spring for the sacred year and the other beginning in the Fall as the Secular year. Such can be challenging for the Chronologists as to what calendar was used for a specific event at a specific time.
scholar JW
i don't know if anyone has stumbled across this video, but it just blew may away.
omg!!!
just goes to show why in dubland they adhere to the 2 witness rule so adamantly and are so anal about it.
Beth Sarim
''Do not Jehovah's Witnesses themselves date Nebuchadnezzar's dream of the metal image to 606/605 BCE?''
For them to support 607BCE, yes
---
Correct for this what the Bible indicates and nicely endorses 1914 as the end of the Gentile Times
As the said scholar has often said, Nice and easy as he demolishes apostate thinking.
scholar JW
i don't know if anyone has stumbled across this video, but it just blew may away.
omg!!!
just goes to show why in dubland they adhere to the 2 witness rule so adamantly and are so anal about it.
johnamos
[Daniel 2:1 In the second year of his
kingship, Neb·u·chad·nezʹzar had a number of dreams, and he* was
so agitated+ that
he could not sleep.]
[Insight on the Scriptures, Volume 2 p. 480 - In 624 B.C.E., in the first official year of his kingship, Nebuchadnezzar again led his forces through Hattu; he captured and sacked the Philistine city of Ashkelon.]
Notice that the Insight volume, p.480 uses the expression' the first official year of his kingship' so this specific expression refers to his initial reign as King beginning Aug/Sept 624 BCE
Further, Dan 2:1 cannot have referred to his regnal years beginning in either 624 or the accepted date of 605/604 BCE as Neb had not yet then brought the Jewish captives including Daniel who interpreted the dream recorded in Dan. ch.2 to Babylon later on with the first deportation in 617 BCE or the accepted date of 587 BCE some 5 years later.
scholar JW
