Hi
[quote]True, my english is not my mothertongue.[quote]
Me neither, I'm Danish.
:-), but here, you say something which makes look the guy as an idiot, by misquoting.
I have made a bit of research, as I know some of the man's writing (some of his papers are actually at the university of Aarhus). You also say, the guy isn't working in France as a psychologist but as software salesman. This isn't true either. After just a reseach on Copernic, on the french web, you find newspapers article. My wife translation is "A psy against cults" The link is:
http://archives.nrco.com/2001/2001.0804/societe/10777754.htm.htm
[quote] Have you read the answer of Morlach ? [quote]
No sorry, I just checked what you talked about, and actually you misquoted quite a bit.
[quote]Why the e-meter is not scientifically corect is a root of the fight against scientology. The links that Morlach has provided are freely and widely knowed by all anticultist; How could you be a "specialist" against scientology and don't know that. [quote]
I don't know. Malka doesn't write any reasons for his search.
[quote] So he asked this but he has never the goal to sued his neighbor ? [quote]
You don't know that either... It seems to me, that whatever the guy says, you find something. Anyone can dig anything up abnout anyone and misuse it,as you do right now. Those are BTW the methods used by Scientology :-)
[quote]Try to save on your hard-disk this :
http://www.malka.fr/sectes/fonctions.pdf [quote]
How do I do? I can't see the menu "save"?
[quote] This is why, when someone make a translation, he indicate where he has take this materiel, this is what i made on my website. Malka has never said where he take the information of his webpage, even if we know that it come from the Watchtower Observer, [quote]
Well, it is told on the Danish site (not much of a help to you, I admit).
As I told you, I have worked with his material, and I received a copy of those papers as I needed it for a study. Those were original papers (and there was more of it than what is put online, this was the reason why I got another copy). It was a Xerox, of course, but it was obviously original papers with notes from the course, original letters and all. It didn't look at all as a print from the Net.
[quote] You are missing the point. For me and other Malka was not a problem, however, but if you tell him kindly when he make a simple mistake this guy become angry and use all he can to make you some problems. [quote]
I couldn't tell. You can see in a Danish group, when he made a mistake in a discussion about GB and someone told him, he actually excused himself in public...
Again, here we could say: A "specialist who makes mistake in public, how horrible!" as you say when you read, he is asking questions... No way to win in this case :-)
[quote] That's all, he is not dangerous, he is simple too proud of him and he is not really a good specialist on the cult's problem because he make regularly some mistake. [quote]
Who don't... You just made a few yourself when you informed on him... A quick check on his name (in french, danish or even englaish) gives in fact a lot of hits which could explain a lot. Was it mistakes you made?
[Quote]When i have read the problem between Dialogos Counselling and him, i have ask directly a danish ex-jw what is the problem, and when Cyril has found that i have contact with a Danish ex-jw, he has become sarcastic and has refused a real dialog. [Quote]
What is Dialogos Counselling? I know it has helped Scientology against Malka and that it doesn't exist any longer, but else... I can try to ask my friends in the press and see?
[quote] That's all. This story is really stupid, but this is what is coming when you deal with Cyril Malka. [Quote]
I have never had problems. But admit, when you misuse a lot of what he is saying or writing, and send false informations about him, you can't expect the man to have a kind of cooperation, can you?
[quote]False he has accused in his french's site the danish ex-jw to collaborate with the scientology and Dialogos Counselling of violate of copyright. [quote]
Well, the first thing *is* actually correct. The ex-jw did actually helped Scientology against him. I find this real stupid from the ex-jw's. If it had been me, I wouldn't have hold it to one little note (it is on his Danish site too). We talked about that part and he send me the letters actually. I can make a scan and mail them to you, if you wish.
For the copyright stuff, I don't know. I can ask DJF (Dansk Journalist Forbund) and find out of more.
[quote] Second he has promote his works as psycholog-analyst bye some very expensive conference of him. If he has not the capacity to be that, and this part of his life, for instance, i know nothing on it, he could be a fake.[quote]
Can you give me the documentation for this one?
[quote] In my personal approach of him, i don't care of him and he don't care of me and the works against the Watchtower go on. But if he continue to make some problem to kent or ex-jw in denmark, i could be more interesting on this subject. [quote]
Well, actually, since it is ex-jw who help Scientology against him, I am not sure he is the one making troubles.
[quote] The only thing new and interesting he has made: The translation of one of CLH's manual is not useful because I have not the autorisation of use it to make some comment on it. To be more explicit, i have not ask him the autorisation, simply because i have provide him a webpage on baptism that i have translate him in french to help him. One month after, he has criticised one of my translation, because the newspaper from where it came is a popular newspaper and not an autoritative newspaper. When i asked him to provide me some document on this case that he told me he had in danish, he didn't want translate it in french or english and at the end of this story, he didn't want even to give me it, because i have said that in Danish, i can make nothing with it. [quote]
Well... It seems you misinform about him too, so is there anything strange in the fact that he just doesn't get pal with you at once?
Again, I'll find out of more with DJF, but I don't agree with your description. If he was *that* terrible, none had to misuse small citations from Usenet or lie to show how horrible he was, would they?
Cheers
Scorpyo