Interesting how youtube severly limiting the ability to view the detroit video. It doesnt violate terms of service and its true but not a narrative youtube supports so trying to have it buried
Bad_Wolf
JoinedPosts by Bad_Wolf
-
42
Liberal vs. Democrat in the U.S.A.
by OnTheWayOut init seems that many believe that a liberal in the usa must be a democrat, pretty much following the party core teachings and some even think it means approving the party history of, during the 19th century, supporting or tolerated slavery and opposing civil rights reforms after the civil war.
some even insist that a liberal loves anything and everything obama did..
balderdash!!.
-
-
-
30
Realization of something very close to a supernatural force but scientific
by Bad_Wolf inafter finding patterns in lottery numbers and thinking about if random truly exists, i also flipped a coin for awhile.
i was counted how many times i would get heads and tails and if they would equal out in the end.
if heads slowly was getting ahead too much, i would suddenly get a bunch of tails in a row to almost equal it out.
-
-
Bad_Wolf
Dice guy, if that's true Then go to a casino and play craps. Craps is a dice rolling game.
-
30
Realization of something very close to a supernatural force but scientific
by Bad_Wolf inafter finding patterns in lottery numbers and thinking about if random truly exists, i also flipped a coin for awhile.
i was counted how many times i would get heads and tails and if they would equal out in the end.
if heads slowly was getting ahead too much, i would suddenly get a bunch of tails in a row to almost equal it out.
-
-
Bad_Wolf
Every time you flip a coin its a 50% chance of it coming up one or the other. Does not matter how many times it comes up heads or tails. This is trying to find patterns where there are none. There is such a thing as random. When its not random you try to not create patterns and that is not random.
Okay I'll explain it as simply as possible. If you flip a coin one time, there is a 50% chance of heads or tails. As I have said, the more times it happens, the more an equalizing tries to be forced. So if you got heads 9 times in a row, you still think 50% chance of getting heads again. But the formula is (1/2)^10 There is a .09% chance of getting heads 10 times in a row. There is a .19% chance of heads 9 times in a row. 1 head in a row, 50% chance, 2 = 25% 3=12.5% 4=6.25 5=3.12, etc. So if heads actually came up 9 times in a row, you know there is .09% chance of it happening 10 times in a row so even though a single flip is 50%, there is .09% chance that it would happen 10 times in a row and higher likely hood a tails will show up to break that streak. And that's called having your luck run out, if a gambler got something against bad odds and kept pushing it.
-
30
Realization of something very close to a supernatural force but scientific
by Bad_Wolf inafter finding patterns in lottery numbers and thinking about if random truly exists, i also flipped a coin for awhile.
i was counted how many times i would get heads and tails and if they would equal out in the end.
if heads slowly was getting ahead too much, i would suddenly get a bunch of tails in a row to almost equal it out.
-
-
Bad_Wolf
Yes. Short term statistical anomalies do happen but in the long run it all tends towards the odds.
But the chances of any number being drawn next is identical.I have found otherwise, but I can't detail it without giving it away and I am intending to try it to my advantage. But maybe the multiple time lottery winners and them going on statistics and probabilities is enough to show that the chances do not always remain identical.
-
30
Realization of something very close to a supernatural force but scientific
by Bad_Wolf inafter finding patterns in lottery numbers and thinking about if random truly exists, i also flipped a coin for awhile.
i was counted how many times i would get heads and tails and if they would equal out in the end.
if heads slowly was getting ahead too much, i would suddenly get a bunch of tails in a row to almost equal it out.
-
-
Bad_Wolf
Unless you have evidence of multiple lottery wins then you're just spouting nonsense.
I have pulled winning lottery numbers, found certain patterns, tested them against winning numbers, and going to do it for real now. But if another person using similar concepts who has won several times counts....(quite a few if you google multiple lottery winners)
First one here had a phd in statistics
http://www.philly.com/philly/news/nation_world/How_lottery_legend_Joan_Ginther_used_odds_Uncle_Sam_to_win_millions.htmlhttps://80sradio.iheart.com/featured/christie-james/content/2017-05-11-this-man-won-the-lottery-14-times-heres-his-secret/ this shows a many who won 14 times and another who won 7 times. (7 time video he is speaking similar to what I am saying, how odds increase when other numbers not used for a time)
And I looked it up, there are people who have won the lottery multiple times. And it seems they used very similar concepts and how odds do increase on these things. But I would not ever go past 'play money' too high of a risk. Investment and business is still the surest way to make money.
-
30
Realization of something very close to a supernatural force but scientific
by Bad_Wolf inafter finding patterns in lottery numbers and thinking about if random truly exists, i also flipped a coin for awhile.
i was counted how many times i would get heads and tails and if they would equal out in the end.
if heads slowly was getting ahead too much, i would suddenly get a bunch of tails in a row to almost equal it out.
-
-
Bad_Wolf
Utter nonsense.
If you have 50 lottery balls, and you have held 1000 lotteries, but number 22 has only been drawn twice, the chances of it being drawn next time is still exactly the same as that of a number that has previously been drawn 200 times.
If I spin ten heads in a row the chance of the next throw being a tail is still 50:50That goes against probability theory and the law of large numbers. The law of large numbers would dictate that if you held 1000 lotteries, that the more lotteries that are held, the more the numbers will average out to an equilibrium. Which means 1000x5=5000/50=average of 100 drawings per number. If number 22 only had been pulled twice, well it just wouldn't.
But I'm going to do some lottery experiments, if I am correct, I'll post pictures. Too many numbers to use patterns and probability to definitely get the entire thing without luck, but to narrow down to a pool of numbers definitely.
-
30
Realization of something very close to a supernatural force but scientific
by Bad_Wolf inafter finding patterns in lottery numbers and thinking about if random truly exists, i also flipped a coin for awhile.
i was counted how many times i would get heads and tails and if they would equal out in the end.
if heads slowly was getting ahead too much, i would suddenly get a bunch of tails in a row to almost equal it out.
-
-
Bad_Wolf
that's not how casinos work. Sometimes people do win. Even if every gambler left while they were ahead, the casino would still be fine because on average there would be enough people that lost from the get-go and never make it up to balance out those that eventually end up ahead.
If you're really interested in this, take a couple statistics classes and you'll quickly understand why you're wrong.Yes I took statistic classes as required for my degree. And the casino is ahead because as you said the average of everybody (all the factors) and over time guarantees that they end up ahead. It will not ever happen that everybody suddenly wins.
-
30
Realization of something very close to a supernatural force but scientific
by Bad_Wolf inafter finding patterns in lottery numbers and thinking about if random truly exists, i also flipped a coin for awhile.
i was counted how many times i would get heads and tails and if they would equal out in the end.
if heads slowly was getting ahead too much, i would suddenly get a bunch of tails in a row to almost equal it out.
-
-
Bad_Wolf
And I've found several stories of multiple time lottery winners who figured out and used these laws to their advantage. But take this to beyond lottery numbers.
Terror attacks, crime, natural disasters, getting laid, almost anything that can be measured and counted. The trick is finding all of the possible variables that are in play (with lottery numbers you know them all, each number) but use that logic to replace those numbers with events and the frequency and the greater the # of drawings, the more accurate it can get.
-
30
Realization of something very close to a supernatural force but scientific
by Bad_Wolf inafter finding patterns in lottery numbers and thinking about if random truly exists, i also flipped a coin for awhile.
i was counted how many times i would get heads and tails and if they would equal out in the end.
if heads slowly was getting ahead too much, i would suddenly get a bunch of tails in a row to almost equal it out.
-
-
Bad_Wolf
oneeyedjoe - It's more the 'the house' policy. Even if a gambler starts to win, if they keep them playing, it's that law that guarantees they will lose and the house will win.
-
30
Realization of something very close to a supernatural force but scientific
by Bad_Wolf inafter finding patterns in lottery numbers and thinking about if random truly exists, i also flipped a coin for awhile.
i was counted how many times i would get heads and tails and if they would equal out in the end.
if heads slowly was getting ahead too much, i would suddenly get a bunch of tails in a row to almost equal it out.
-
-
Bad_Wolf
After finding patterns in lottery numbers and thinking about if random truly exists, I also flipped a coin for awhile. I was counted how many times I would get heads and tails and if they would equal out in the end. If heads slowly was getting ahead too much, I would suddenly get a bunch of tails in a row to almost equal it out. On lottery numbers, I would track and use several calculations to determine numbers that should pop up next, and many times they would. I started to wonder if there was a force that the longer a type of event or tracking was happening and monitored, that outcomes that are supposed to be random could be predicted or odds increased. If pulling 1 number of 70 in a lottery is 1/70, but certain ones are due to pop up, is it truly still a 1/70 chance or much higher chance?
But others beat me to it. What I am referring to is a combination of the "law of large numbers" and the "central limit theorem". Related to this, Sir Francis Galton said, "I know of scarcely anything so apt to impress the imagination as the wonderful form of cosmic order expressed by the "Law of Frequency of Error". The law would have been personified by the Greeks and deified, if they had known of it. It reigns with serenity and in complete self-effacement, amidst the wildest confusion. The huger the mob, and the greater the apparent anarchy, the more perfect is its sway. It is the supreme law of Unreason. Whenever a large sample of chaotic elements are taken in hand and marshalled in the order of their magnitude, an unsuspected and most beautiful form of regularity proves to have been latent all along."
It is probably hard to comprehend, and very hard to explain, but essentially the more in which something (an event) can be counted, such as lottery drawings, or life/world events, as soon as an accurate "odds of happening" out of all other variables are factored in, then able to determine when something is due and then it will happen. When you are able to test it yourself and see it happening, it's a mindfuck on reality. Almost like the monitoring photon experiment.