Utter nonsense.
If you have 50 lottery balls, and you have held 1000 lotteries, but number 22 has only been drawn twice, the chances of it being drawn next time is still exactly the same as that of a number that has previously been drawn 200 times.
If I spin ten heads in a row the chance of the next throw being a tail is still 50:50
That goes against probability theory and the law of large numbers. The law of large numbers would dictate that if you held 1000 lotteries, that the more lotteries that are held, the more the numbers will average out to an equilibrium. Which means 1000x5=5000/50=average of 100 drawings per number. If number 22 only had been pulled twice, well it just wouldn't.
But I'm going to do some lottery experiments, if I am correct, I'll post pictures. Too many numbers to use patterns and probability to definitely get the entire thing without luck, but to narrow down to a pool of numbers definitely.