tragic occurrence:.
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/steve-scalise-shot-in-virginia-aide-also-hit/ar-bbcfakv?li=bbnb7kz.
i saw another report indicating that the gunman may have targetting gop members.
World democracy currently see USA current democracy as flawed because of TRUMP
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/01/26/mapped-democracy-around-world-donald-trump-branded-consequence/
USA is a laughing stock to the world because of TRUMP of should I say DRUMPF
tragic occurrence:.
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/steve-scalise-shot-in-virginia-aide-also-hit/ar-bbcfakv?li=bbnb7kz.
i saw another report indicating that the gunman may have targetting gop members.
Great attempt at trying to blame Trump for the violence of the left but sorry, no cigar. Welcome to democracy, where people are allowed to chose someone else
FISH MUCH !?
Im Irish working in USA. most people in Ireland say TRUMP is a NUTJOB and I believe most in Europe are of the same opinion
where did you get your degree ? TRUMP UN ?
lol ..pog mo thoin
tragic occurrence:.
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/steve-scalise-shot-in-virginia-aide-also-hit/ar-bbcfakv?li=bbnb7kz.
i saw another report indicating that the gunman may have targetting gop members.
The you should get a gun and fight it ... especially as everyone is a nazi.
Or maybe stop just peddling the democratic nonsense which is just as divisive if not more so.
Or maybe just report you to the authorities, about comments that incite people to violence and extremism, because of their political opinions or religious beliefs.
its people with your attitude that are killing ! ass
if “tree of good and bad” were literal, it would mean adam and eve would know what is “good and bad” only after eating of that tree.
however, even before eating of it, they would think “it is good for us to eat of this tree” which means they are already endowed knowledge of “good and bad.” that means “tree of good and bad” is symbolic of something.. since religious organizations interpret this differently, each reader has to adopt his own conclusion.
for me it looks like this: one thinks of good and bad in relation to himself—if something is beneficial for him he would say it is good for him, and bad for him if it is not beneficial.
sorry I hear an echo on the line ..someone butting in ....bbbbbbbbbbbbbbb
mr. Rabbit ...is starting to hop hop hop ...down rabbit holes ...
what snake oil are you guys selling ?
lol
if “tree of good and bad” were literal, it would mean adam and eve would know what is “good and bad” only after eating of that tree.
however, even before eating of it, they would think “it is good for us to eat of this tree” which means they are already endowed knowledge of “good and bad.” that means “tree of good and bad” is symbolic of something.. since religious organizations interpret this differently, each reader has to adopt his own conclusion.
for me it looks like this: one thinks of good and bad in relation to himself—if something is beneficial for him he would say it is good for him, and bad for him if it is not beneficial.
So after all that, you now came to realize there was a choice between two conflicting statements ?
if “tree of good and bad” were literal, it would mean adam and eve would know what is “good and bad” only after eating of that tree.
however, even before eating of it, they would think “it is good for us to eat of this tree” which means they are already endowed knowledge of “good and bad.” that means “tree of good and bad” is symbolic of something.. since religious organizations interpret this differently, each reader has to adopt his own conclusion.
for me it looks like this: one thinks of good and bad in relation to himself—if something is beneficial for him he would say it is good for him, and bad for him if it is not beneficial.
sorry... is this a threesome now ?
if “tree of good and bad” were literal, it would mean adam and eve would know what is “good and bad” only after eating of that tree.
however, even before eating of it, they would think “it is good for us to eat of this tree” which means they are already endowed knowledge of “good and bad.” that means “tree of good and bad” is symbolic of something.. since religious organizations interpret this differently, each reader has to adopt his own conclusion.
for me it looks like this: one thinks of good and bad in relation to himself—if something is beneficial for him he would say it is good for him, and bad for him if it is not beneficial.
What was said about the *tree* previously, before Mr. snake eye showed up ?
ms deegee ;)
if “tree of good and bad” were literal, it would mean adam and eve would know what is “good and bad” only after eating of that tree.
however, even before eating of it, they would think “it is good for us to eat of this tree” which means they are already endowed knowledge of “good and bad.” that means “tree of good and bad” is symbolic of something.. since religious organizations interpret this differently, each reader has to adopt his own conclusion.
for me it looks like this: one thinks of good and bad in relation to himself—if something is beneficial for him he would say it is good for him, and bad for him if it is not beneficial.
so EVE was confronted with two different statements, in a normal cognitive mind that would create a choice, a decision, unless you are brain dead like deegee !
one of the most frustrating things.
when you confront jw's about what they believe they will often deny it.
such as "if your child is disfellowshipped then you can't have contact with them ever again".
OP.. But why?
They can't be seen as extremists..the old theocratic warfare machine, to avoid the CULT label !
I remember we had to portray our kids having hobbies and played outside as *NORMAL* kids for potential custody cases and sundry ..
if “tree of good and bad” were literal, it would mean adam and eve would know what is “good and bad” only after eating of that tree.
however, even before eating of it, they would think “it is good for us to eat of this tree” which means they are already endowed knowledge of “good and bad.” that means “tree of good and bad” is symbolic of something.. since religious organizations interpret this differently, each reader has to adopt his own conclusion.
for me it looks like this: one thinks of good and bad in relation to himself—if something is beneficial for him he would say it is good for him, and bad for him if it is not beneficial.
I think the whole point of the storey (real or myth) is who do we trust ?
