Having a discussion on a forum about certain topics is about expressing ideas, agreeing sometimes and perhaps disagreeing but still respecting one anothers opinion.
........respectfully RM
anyone following the derek chauvin trial?.
if you are actually following it, not just listening to the media, you will likely realize that there is a huge gap between what is going on in court and what is being reported in the media.. if the trial was fair, i think he should be acquitted.
there is plenty of reasonable doubt about the cause of death (his dealer doesn't want to testify because he could be guilty of 3rd degree murder for selling him a fatal amount of fentanyl) and even doubt over whether the officer even had his knee on the guys neck or did anything counter to what they were meant to do as per policy.. but is it fair?
Having a discussion on a forum about certain topics is about expressing ideas, agreeing sometimes and perhaps disagreeing but still respecting one anothers opinion.
........respectfully RM
do you believe org gonna go back to regular meetings in khs?
i highly doubt that.
reason is, pedophile situation.
Yes they will go back after the social restrictions are lifted, your theorizing and dreaming nonsensically..
They will return to Kingdom Halls just like before the virus problem.
Do you think they are just going to leave thousands of buildings empty and just continue on Zoom ?
so sam rolex had this months talk on jw cult broadcasting.
my question to sam rolex is why not sell your rolex and give it to the cult?
how about muppet lett, why not sell your rental property in ga and give it to the cult?
Its like Sam Heard is head of some religious publishing organization trying to exploit and manipulate people toward getting more subservient and loyal public sales representatives for the organization.
........Oh wait a second !
anyone following the derek chauvin trial?.
if you are actually following it, not just listening to the media, you will likely realize that there is a huge gap between what is going on in court and what is being reported in the media.. if the trial was fair, i think he should be acquitted.
there is plenty of reasonable doubt about the cause of death (his dealer doesn't want to testify because he could be guilty of 3rd degree murder for selling him a fatal amount of fentanyl) and even doubt over whether the officer even had his knee on the guys neck or did anything counter to what they were meant to do as per policy.. but is it fair?
This was not an intentional murder by any means and I'm surprised the prosecution went for that charge. They had all the information about Floyd's health condition before they pressed charges.
Just to note, the hold down position that Chauvin made couldn't been too restrictive because Floyd could still talk and did so for a few minutes of being held that way.
The cops were probably thinking hey this is big strong guy, he can take this.
The damming evidence in this case is shown by the police's body cam footage when one officer goes to check for a pulse on Floyd's arm and says I dont get a pulse but all the officers there including Chauvin didn't make a motion to turn him over and try to resuscitate him.
anyone following the derek chauvin trial?.
if you are actually following it, not just listening to the media, you will likely realize that there is a huge gap between what is going on in court and what is being reported in the media.. if the trial was fair, i think he should be acquitted.
there is plenty of reasonable doubt about the cause of death (his dealer doesn't want to testify because he could be guilty of 3rd degree murder for selling him a fatal amount of fentanyl) and even doubt over whether the officer even had his knee on the guys neck or did anything counter to what they were meant to do as per policy.. but is it fair?
Established laws are not designed to uphold preferred individual biases.
What was missing in this forced restraint was why didn't the officers tell Floyd that they will get off him if he goes into the police car ?
It looks like they were attempting to hogtie and lift him into the car but couldn't follow through with that.
The situation was more well you wont go into the car peacefully so we will apply police force against you.
The following steps to successfully make him get into the car on his own or without struggle seemed to get obscured .
The shouting intervening street pedestrians seemed to have made the matters worse.
.
.
let's all open up our crystals to 2 facet 1: 1 - here we lean about how buddha escapes prism.
anyone following the derek chauvin trial?.
if you are actually following it, not just listening to the media, you will likely realize that there is a huge gap between what is going on in court and what is being reported in the media.. if the trial was fair, i think he should be acquitted.
there is plenty of reasonable doubt about the cause of death (his dealer doesn't want to testify because he could be guilty of 3rd degree murder for selling him a fatal amount of fentanyl) and even doubt over whether the officer even had his knee on the guys neck or did anything counter to what they were meant to do as per policy.. but is it fair?
@Rocket: Why would it be fool hardy?
Well for one the attending officers did not take due care and attention concerning the health and welfare during the actions of subduing a suspect of a unlawful crime.
And the general public, including the black community is watching this case very closely to see if fair and equatable justice is being served to the accused.
If there is an acquittal and those cops get off scott free without any charges being laid, expect riots in the streets once again.
That you can count on.
anyone following the derek chauvin trial?.
if you are actually following it, not just listening to the media, you will likely realize that there is a huge gap between what is going on in court and what is being reported in the media.. if the trial was fair, i think he should be acquitted.
there is plenty of reasonable doubt about the cause of death (his dealer doesn't want to testify because he could be guilty of 3rd degree murder for selling him a fatal amount of fentanyl) and even doubt over whether the officer even had his knee on the guys neck or did anything counter to what they were meant to do as per policy.. but is it fair?
It would be fool hardy for the court to not make any punishable consequences toward the attending police officers..
The murder charges should be dropped and other lessor criminal negligence charges should be imposed.
My guess is that's exactly whats going to happen.
anyone following the derek chauvin trial?.
if you are actually following it, not just listening to the media, you will likely realize that there is a huge gap between what is going on in court and what is being reported in the media.. if the trial was fair, i think he should be acquitted.
there is plenty of reasonable doubt about the cause of death (his dealer doesn't want to testify because he could be guilty of 3rd degree murder for selling him a fatal amount of fentanyl) and even doubt over whether the officer even had his knee on the guys neck or did anything counter to what they were meant to do as per policy.. but is it fair?
I previously said bad things about the stand by pedestrians which may have not been totally correct. .
They saw a man on the ground blacked out unconscious with a police officer pressing his knee across his neck, they were just showing concern for the person out of empathy.
Its appears more now this was really a case of overuse of force provoking negligence in providing care and attention toward the health of a subdued and retained probable suspect .
anyone following the derek chauvin trial?.
if you are actually following it, not just listening to the media, you will likely realize that there is a huge gap between what is going on in court and what is being reported in the media.. if the trial was fair, i think he should be acquitted.
there is plenty of reasonable doubt about the cause of death (his dealer doesn't want to testify because he could be guilty of 3rd degree murder for selling him a fatal amount of fentanyl) and even doubt over whether the officer even had his knee on the guys neck or did anything counter to what they were meant to do as per policy.. but is it fair?
The simple question is did the cop and other policemen purposely try to make Floyd die.
Thats a far stretch to conclude being that those police officers had body cams working and filming their activity and there was a lot of people around watching the whole event..
What motive would they for all of them to together make a agenda to intentionally kill someone right in the open public like that ?
Cops aren't that stupid.
What probably happened is that the police were pressed to make themselves in control of the situation as we are the police in power when public civilians on the street were telling them what to do.
They may have assumed that well this guy is a lowly drugged up felony with a criminal record therefore were less inspired to give him proper care and attention because of that
Even society's lowest need to be addressed and handled like everyone else according to established law constitutes.