anyone following the derek chauvin trial?.
if you are actually following it, not just listening to the media, you will likely realize that there is a huge gap between what is going on in court and what is being reported in the media.. if the trial was fair, i think he should be acquitted.
there is plenty of reasonable doubt about the cause of death (his dealer doesn't want to testify because he could be guilty of 3rd degree murder for selling him a fatal amount of fentanyl) and even doubt over whether the officer even had his knee on the guys neck or did anything counter to what they were meant to do as per policy.. but is it fair?
It could quite conceivable that if the attending officers including Chauvin had noticed Floyd went unconscious and they quickly made an attempt to revive him, there would be no trial right now.
It would have just gone down that the cause of his death was Floyd's own apparent health condition and drugs in his system, the police officers were just doing their duty in a proper and approved way.
anyone following the derek chauvin trial?.
if you are actually following it, not just listening to the media, you will likely realize that there is a huge gap between what is going on in court and what is being reported in the media.. if the trial was fair, i think he should be acquitted.
there is plenty of reasonable doubt about the cause of death (his dealer doesn't want to testify because he could be guilty of 3rd degree murder for selling him a fatal amount of fentanyl) and even doubt over whether the officer even had his knee on the guys neck or did anything counter to what they were meant to do as per policy.. but is it fair?
Getting back to the topic ......
anyone following the derek chauvin trial?.
if you are actually following it, not just listening to the media, you will likely realize that there is a huge gap between what is going on in court and what is being reported in the media.. if the trial was fair, i think he should be acquitted.
there is plenty of reasonable doubt about the cause of death (his dealer doesn't want to testify because he could be guilty of 3rd degree murder for selling him a fatal amount of fentanyl) and even doubt over whether the officer even had his knee on the guys neck or did anything counter to what they were meant to do as per policy.. but is it fair?
Having a discussion on a forum about certain topics is about expressing ideas, agreeing sometimes and perhaps disagreeing but still respecting one anothers opinion.
........respectfully RM
do you believe org gonna go back to regular meetings in khs?
i highly doubt that.
reason is, pedophile situation.
Yes they will go back after the social restrictions are lifted, your theorizing and dreaming nonsensically..
They will return to Kingdom Halls just like before the virus problem.
Do you think they are just going to leave thousands of buildings empty and just continue on Zoom ?
so sam rolex had this months talk on jw cult broadcasting.
my question to sam rolex is why not sell your rolex and give it to the cult?
how about muppet lett, why not sell your rental property in ga and give it to the cult?
Its like Sam Heard is head of some religious publishing organization trying to exploit and manipulate people toward getting more subservient and loyal public sales representatives for the organization.
........Oh wait a second !
anyone following the derek chauvin trial?.
if you are actually following it, not just listening to the media, you will likely realize that there is a huge gap between what is going on in court and what is being reported in the media.. if the trial was fair, i think he should be acquitted.
there is plenty of reasonable doubt about the cause of death (his dealer doesn't want to testify because he could be guilty of 3rd degree murder for selling him a fatal amount of fentanyl) and even doubt over whether the officer even had his knee on the guys neck or did anything counter to what they were meant to do as per policy.. but is it fair?
This was not an intentional murder by any means and I'm surprised the prosecution went for that charge. They had all the information about Floyd's health condition before they pressed charges.
Just to note, the hold down position that Chauvin made couldn't been too restrictive because Floyd could still talk and did so for a few minutes of being held that way.
The cops were probably thinking hey this is big strong guy, he can take this.
The damming evidence in this case is shown by the police's body cam footage when one officer goes to check for a pulse on Floyd's arm and says I dont get a pulse but all the officers there including Chauvin didn't make a motion to turn him over and try to resuscitate him.
anyone following the derek chauvin trial?.
if you are actually following it, not just listening to the media, you will likely realize that there is a huge gap between what is going on in court and what is being reported in the media.. if the trial was fair, i think he should be acquitted.
there is plenty of reasonable doubt about the cause of death (his dealer doesn't want to testify because he could be guilty of 3rd degree murder for selling him a fatal amount of fentanyl) and even doubt over whether the officer even had his knee on the guys neck or did anything counter to what they were meant to do as per policy.. but is it fair?
Established laws are not designed to uphold preferred individual biases.
What was missing in this forced restraint was why didn't the officers tell Floyd that they will get off him if he goes into the police car ?
It looks like they were attempting to hogtie and lift him into the car but couldn't follow through with that.
The situation was more well you wont go into the car peacefully so we will apply police force against you.
The following steps to successfully make him get into the car on his own or without struggle seemed to get obscured .
The shouting intervening street pedestrians seemed to have made the matters worse.
.
.
let's all open up our crystals to 2 facet 1: 1 - here we lean about how buddha escapes prism.
anyone following the derek chauvin trial?.
if you are actually following it, not just listening to the media, you will likely realize that there is a huge gap between what is going on in court and what is being reported in the media.. if the trial was fair, i think he should be acquitted.
there is plenty of reasonable doubt about the cause of death (his dealer doesn't want to testify because he could be guilty of 3rd degree murder for selling him a fatal amount of fentanyl) and even doubt over whether the officer even had his knee on the guys neck or did anything counter to what they were meant to do as per policy.. but is it fair?
@Rocket: Why would it be fool hardy?
Well for one the attending officers did not take due care and attention concerning the health and welfare during the actions of subduing a suspect of a unlawful crime.
And the general public, including the black community is watching this case very closely to see if fair and equatable justice is being served to the accused.
If there is an acquittal and those cops get off scott free without any charges being laid, expect riots in the streets once again.
That you can count on.
anyone following the derek chauvin trial?.
if you are actually following it, not just listening to the media, you will likely realize that there is a huge gap between what is going on in court and what is being reported in the media.. if the trial was fair, i think he should be acquitted.
there is plenty of reasonable doubt about the cause of death (his dealer doesn't want to testify because he could be guilty of 3rd degree murder for selling him a fatal amount of fentanyl) and even doubt over whether the officer even had his knee on the guys neck or did anything counter to what they were meant to do as per policy.. but is it fair?
It would be fool hardy for the court to not make any punishable consequences toward the attending police officers..
The murder charges should be dropped and other lessor criminal negligence charges should be imposed.
My guess is that's exactly whats going to happen.
