Posts by searchfothetruth

now, the war is over, the weapons were not used and of course have not been found.. how threatening could they be if they did not even use them when being invaded by a massive force (of the countries they hate)?!

perhaps, as many suspect, they didn't use them because they didn't have them?.

now we're being told that we'll have to be patient and give them time to find them.

searchfothetruth

Weapons of mass destruction: we cannot let them get away with it

25 May 2003

Where are Iraq's weapons of mass destruction? On 18 March, Tony Blair made what was regarded at the time as one of the best and most important speeches of his political career. Opening the historic debate in the Commons on the eve of the war against Iraq, Mr Blair focused almost entirely on the dangers posed by Saddam Hussein's weapons. The speech is worth revisiting because the superficially persuasive arguments deployed then are in such astonishing contrast to Mr Blair's evasiveness now.

Labour MPs challenge Blair over Iraq's WMDs

By Andy McSmith, Severin Carrell and Paul Lashmar

25 May 2003

Tony Blair is facing growing political pressure to explain the mystery of Iraq's missing weapons of mass destruction. With no solid evidence yet that there are any chemical, biological or nuclear weapons in occupied Iraq, more than 70 MPs, including 53 Labour MPs, have signed a Commons motion challenging him to prove his claim that they were ever there in the first place.

Britain's participation in the invasion of Iraq is to be condemned as illegal by eminent international lawyers at a conference in London next weekend. The conflict raised two issues, said Professor Philippe Sands QC, a member of Cherie Booth's Matrix chambers. "First, did the Security Council authorise the use of force, and the answer to that is no. And were we misled about the presence of weapons of mass destruction? Apparently, yes."

In the US the CIA has begun an inquiry into whether its intelligence was faulty, but it is not thought that MI6 will do the same. Menzies Campbell, the Liberal Democrat foreign affairs spokesman, wants intelligence chiefs to be made to answer to Parliament as other senior civil servants have to.

Just two articles from the Independant this week regarding the Weapons of Mass Disappearence!

39

Are you for or against....

by RubyTuesday in

the senate passed the tax-cut today.

i'm mainly for it but i can see where there might be some problems with it.what do you think?.

http://www.msnbc.com/news/906941.asp?vts=052320030845.

searchfothetruth

Deficit under Bush

Case rest, m'lud

23

Political campaigns disgust me

by Reborn2002 in

jw
friends

i do not care if you endorse the republican party, democrats, independents, or even the green party.

but to see such inordinate amounts of money go into campaigns disgusts me.

the economy is flailing and people are homeless and starving, all the while these fatcats live high off the hog and mingle at dinners while kissing one another's asses.. this is not a post directed specifically at any candidate.

searchfothetruth

I think at the top levels Democrat and Republicans have exactly the same politics...

those of self enrichment and screw everybody else.

Political division are diversions.