Randi is awesome.
The site hosting the article you linked to is pro-supernatural and anti-Randi.
Yes I realize that. Chances of finding an objective site that is neither pro or against Randi is nill.
But my whole point of posting was to show that the prize was not claimed which could can be considered a victory for the "paranormal is bunk" side.
I always try to see things from both sides.
If I would have posted from a pro Randi site someone else would have said that the site hosting the article is pro Randi and anti supernatural.
If there is a truly objective site on the topic I'd love to learn about it.