When Looking at uncertain situations be it conspiracy theorys or not one must be able to challenge everything in order to choose what to believe, because in the end none of us were there (inside craft at the time )and knows for sure.
From my viewpoint , and i may be wrong i think Americans Landed on the moon on July 20, 1969.Russians didnt contest it to my knoledge .Why was the ORIGINALl footage of one of the highest moments in human histoy overwritten and other "dubious" themes i dont have a formed oppinion but sounds a bit... awkward at least and its things like these that fuel the sometimes controversial themes
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_11_missing_tapes
What i find amazind is caracters like DJS.
One thing i learned over the years is that the kind of people that :
1 - are UNABLE to discuss a subject without insulting others "immature arrogant narcissist" "insane" implying drinking problems or bisexuallity in other users
2 - asks for peoples C.V. in order to accept theyre oppinion , but he that presents himself as some sort of "specialist" with extensive contacts within the area dont provide nothing to back that up apart from i did this and that that a 12 year old can write in theyre mama basement:
"Please provide your level of education, your advanced degrees
and the experience you have that enables you to make such definitive
statements about technical and scientific issues." Evidence sir , is not what you say you did , but what you can prove to others BTW, in case you didnt had trainning in that Area
3 - Generalization ( all conspiracy theorys in same bag)
Are just TOXIC , dont promote a healthy discussion and there should be an option to skip theyre low standars comments.
Implying that in order to fake an event this size WOULD HAVE to have many ppl involved , i am sorry sir , but that just demonstrates how limited your knowledge of Space Operations is ,withing N.A.S.A or E.S.A only ones i have some info.IF you really had some insight you would know that is a NEED TO KNOW BASIS and the whole picture is only available for a few (i can understand why and is understandable i think)
So you see , although i sort have the same end opinion that you in this issue , our aproach collide frontally
in wich i think you REASON with people as you apparently want to force them to believe in you by calling them (*******) if they present other perspective or pointing out sexual remarks wich is , you know ,LOW and surelly not from someone so extensivelly experienced in discussing complicated tecnical issues with other people.
I would ask Simon to have a look at this , as if users are HARASSED and INSULTED by theyre opinion and they dont have an option to blacklist /ignore that person they will leave , as it is one of his purpose ,written in other post.
Take Care All