I Googled "Lloyd Evans scandal". This came up.
"Did Lloyd Evans and Kim Silvo caused a rift in the exjw community?"
original reddit post (removed).
I Googled "Lloyd Evans scandal". This came up.
"Did Lloyd Evans and Kim Silvo caused a rift in the exjw community?"
original reddit post (removed).
Those screenshots make me glad I'm not on twitter. It looks exhausting.
original reddit post (removed).
NonCoinCollector, I had to read your last comment twice for it to sink in. And then I laughed.
original reddit post (removed).
Diogenesister,
Yes, I agree. Why were a betrayal of trust and privacy at issue if the photos portrayed something absolutely innocent and random.
The term “circular reasoning” came to my mind. The longer the sequence of events within a circular reasoning, the more difficult the “circular reasoning” is to detect and define.
Wikipedia, Circular reasoning:
“The Pyrrhonist philosopher Sextus Empiricus described the problem of circular reasoning as "the reciprocal trope": “
The reciprocal trope occurs when what ought to be confirmatory of the object under investigation needs to be made convincing by the object under investigation; then, being unable to take either in order to establish the other, we suspend judgement about both.
original reddit post (removed).
He had a really good thing going with the ex-jw videos. Money. Fame. Creativity. Having followers of his personality who didn't care much about his beliefs or lack thereof. A family is a terrible thing to waste. Smh.
original reddit post (removed).
Croatian to English translators, photos, and their pay rates.
https://www.upwork.com/hire/croatian-to-english-translators/hr/
Three different fellows listed are named "Marko M". :)
original reddit post (removed).
NonCoinCollector, If anyone wants to lay out cash to get copies of the court filing, I think I’ve found the right website for ordering copies of that document. This link has a phone number, a Fax number, and two email addresses. There are pdf files. One pdf file is the information request form. All is in Croatian, of course.
Government website
http://www.vsrh.hr/EasyWeb.asp?pcpid=39
Right to information
... Persons authorized for providing information on the Supreme Court of the Republic of Croatia, its operation and administration as well as court proceedings are:
- Secretary General of the Supreme Court
- Office of the President – phone: 00 385 1 48 62 222, fax: 00 385 1 48 10 035, e-mail: [email protected], [email protected]
The relevant procedure for obtaining information from the Supreme Court may be found in the following documents:
[A list with prices for the ordered documents follows.]
Requests may be submitted directly, by post or e-mail at the following address: [email protected]
original reddit post (removed).
I’ve typed up the transcript of a two-minute portion of one of Lloyd Evans videos to share here on Jehovahs-witness forum. I’ve written a few words in capital letters, just so no one misses the reason I’m posting this. (My capitalization does not here indicate “shouting”.) Enjoy!
Title of video:
A conversation with M. James Penton (Watchtower historian, author and former elder)
4 years ago
Beginning 1:12:07
James Penton: ...so, I would say “move on”, find some joy, and continue to be a MORAL PERSON.
Lloyd Evans: Yeah, well, I think that’s the key, is being a MORAL PERSON, and you can, you can get there by any number of means. I think it’s really nice, as well, and just kind of going back to what we were saying before about kind of infighting and acrimony between ex Jehovah’s Witnesses,... it’s nice that you and I can have different views on whether there’s a god or not but still be friends, and still get along and still appreciate each other’s ideas. What’s interesting, I actually visited Vancouver back in June.
James Penton: Oh! Wonderful!
Lloyd Evans: Yeah. And someone stood up in the audience and said something along the lines of, you know, of “please tell me that there’s no one here who’s religious. You know we can get rid of religion entirely. Or, why don’t you tell people that they should all be atheist” or something along those lines. And my answer, I forget the exact words,...I think it’s in the, in the video, but how I feel about that is that it’s entirely up to the individual whether they decide to continue as a Christian or to get rid of religion all together. The main thing, as you say, is to be a MORAL PERSON, and to show kindness to your fellow man. And, I would also say that simply being an atheist doesn’t say anything about your morality. So, that’s why, even though I’m an atheist, I’m also a humanist. So, I believe in the advancement of the species, and I believe in equality and trying to make the world as loving and kind as it can possibly be. So, on that I think we can kind of agree that however, whatever journey we take to arrive at that better world, we need to be thinking about how we can get there.
Ending 1:14:15
original reddit post (removed).
Thanks, JeffT for this info:
“The way it works in the real world is the author pays other people to include their stories in a his work of non-fiction. It is payment for the copyright to include their story.”
original reddit post (removed).
KIMSILVIO, You're so welcome. The following Croatian court email address [[email protected]] is at the end of the below-translated page. The same email address is at the end of other Croatian court pages which offer similar information. Depending on how helpful the attending government employee wants to be, this might be the cheapest and least confusing way to get information. On emails, Google Translate is your translator, unlike trying to talk on the phone.
■[For additional information and questions, feel free to contact us by e-mail: [email protected]]■
https://sudskapraksa.csp.vsrh.hr/home
Homepage Total number of published decisions: 240710 Case law portal About searching and reviewing decisions Welcome to the website of the database of court decisions called Judicial Practice - Portal of Judicial Practice. Judicial practice is an information system created within the PHARE 2006 project "Harmonization and publication of judicial practice" and provides insight into the judicial practice of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Croatia and other courts in the Republic of Croatia. The main goal and purpose of the project is the so-called. harmonization of court practice, ie availability of court decisions to all judges and court advisers in all courts of the Republic of Croatia, as well as to the general and legal public. The constitutional task of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Croatia is to ensure the uniform application of the law and the equality of citizens, as well as the system of publishing case law on the Internet. Judicial practice is the basis for publishing decisions of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Croatia and other courts of the Republic of Croatia. The Supreme Court of the Republic of Croatia publishes all its decisions (without selection) and the database contains all decisions of that court from 1990 until today, while other courts publish only the most important court decisions. Along with especially important and interesting decisions, legal positions (so-called sentences) are published. Judicial decisions of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Croatia made in connection with the request for a trial within a reasonable time, due to a large number of identical (typical) decisions, are no longer published from 1 July 2012, except those in which a significant legal position is taken. The system also provides insight into the case law published in the printed editions of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Croatia entitled "Choice of Decisions".Each decision in the database has a complete text, which differs from the original in protecting the privacy of the parties, and associated metadata (for example: name of court, court department, date of decision, type of decision, etc.) available to the general public. legal public. Due to the protection of the parties in the proceedings, identification data on natural and legal persons were missing, according to the Decision on publication and anonymization of court decisions and Instructions on how to anonymize court decisions of the President of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Croatia. Access to court decisions is completely free. The opening of texts and metadata about the decision was protected by an authentication system, the so-called CAPTCHA control code, which checks whether the system was accessed by a human or a computer with the intention of illegal access. As of February 4, 2019, the protection with the control code - the CAPTCHA system has been removed and access to the texts of decisions has been provided. Decision texts are stored in two formats: TXT format (plain text) and PDF format. A PDF viewer or Acrobat Reader or similar PDF viewer is required to view and read decision texts. At the link you can download the manual for users of the Judicial Practice portal: User manual For additional information and questions, feel free to contact us by e-mail: [email protected]