I don't know how it works in the USA, I realize that the mentality is profoundly different from the one we have here in the EU, but I really can't understand how reasoning like this can be done: "Can you prove that this is NOT the case?"
In Roman law the defendant must never prove that he is innocent, it is the prosecution that must prove that he is guilty of something, by bringing evidence to support it. This is why I find the request inconceivable:
Can you prove to us the Watchtower has no relationship or shares with Lockheed Martin?
Can you prove to us the Watchtower has no relationships or shares with Boeing?
Can you prove the Watchtower has no relationships or shares with other Military companies, or companies that make weapons?
It's like asking yourself: Can you prove that WT doesn't have a base on Mars?
Please don't get me wrong, I don't want to criticize or attack anyone, I just want to understand your approach