Ok so you ignore or don't believe GERS figures and are willing to gamble the future of the nation and families based on that gamble? I don't like that risk.
You keep saying it was a SNP landslide last Thursday and it was...in terms of seats.
But in an indy referendum it is number of voters that counts and it is only 2 options to choose from. Yes or No.
If you take all the votes for pro-union parties and add them together 56% of Scotland voted for them. If they were all one party then SNP would have ten seats not 48 as only ten seats won by more than 50% of the votes.
I'm struggling to understand why you think Scotland has a mandate for indyref2 when a) the number of voters that voted SNP, the only indy party, was 35% of the entire voting population of Scotland and only 45% of those that actually voted and b) Of those that voted SNP, the 45% it is estimated 25% of them voted tactically against the Tories and do not support independence.
How can Scotland have a mandate for another indyref when the latest polls show it is not over 50% but more importantly the majority of Scotland in terms of number of voters voted for pro-union parties.
The SNP are not the majority of Scottish voters and do not represent a majority of Scottish people if you count votes not seats and it is votes that will the important thing in an indyref.
If the majority of Scotland do not want an indyref and align themselves to parties and vote in the GE to say so then surely it is against democracy and a complete waste of time and money to have another indyref?
Add in the main reason why it seems to have indyred2 is to get back into the EU where the SNP acknowledge it will take decades via their Growth Commission report then it makes no sense.
I think we need to get Brexit done, the SNP improve their awful track record of devolved powers and let our nations heal a bit. Perhaps review in 5 years time.
I've done 2 referendums and 3 GE's in the last 5 years. Time to stop.