uh oh, looks like the mega thread gave up the ghost, so while i investigate / fix it just continue the discussion here .... it's been a long 9 years lloyd evans / john cedars.
I'm guessing someone managed to snag his username/handle/tag
It's happened to a few people who flounce from twitter.
The link works because he hasn't removed the original links from when it WAS his account.
If I'm right, he won't be able to recover his old handle if he does come back. Which is beyond hilarious, he will have to go back into every video and edit all of the links out 😆😆
uh oh, looks like the mega thread gave up the ghost, so while i investigate / fix it just continue the discussion here .... it's been a long 9 years lloyd evans / john cedars.
Well said 👏
uh oh, looks like the mega thread gave up the ghost, so while i investigate / fix it just continue the discussion here .... it's been a long 9 years lloyd evans / john cedars.
I'm guessing he will try and spin it that his specific salary, not the business income, was the thing that wasn't 6 figures.
But again, as we have discussed, people are allowed to use available information to come to reasonable conclusions.
The business figures, constant holidays, enjoying a wealthy lifestyle in a poor country, prostitutes, drugs, all of that indicates that he receives a hefty income.
As for defamation, it is not a crime to earn 6 figures. So even if it WAS a false statement, how is it defamatory...?
uh oh, looks like the mega thread gave up the ghost, so while i investigate / fix it just continue the discussion here .... it's been a long 9 years lloyd evans / john cedars.
Even if somehow he managed to prove that he just bumped into a woman in the street and started dating her, and her profession happened to be sex work-
It is still reasonable for someone to conclude that he used her services, based on his previous confessions.
Let's imagine if the question is 'did tamalam buy groceries at Walmart?'
If you can show me saying I went to Walmart, had previously done so many times, spent X amount of time there, took money there, and left with groceries: It is reasonable to conclude I bought groceries there.
I could prove later (maybe via cctv) that I went inside and was handed groceries as a gift, or I was only retrieving groceries for someone else.
My proof does not make the original statement a defamatory lie. Because it was a reasonable conclusion made in good faith with the evidence available at the time. False, technically. But not defamatory. There has to be malice.
uh oh, looks like the mega thread gave up the ghost, so while i investigate / fix it just continue the discussion here .... it's been a long 9 years lloyd evans / john cedars.
He needs to show hard evidence the sex worker he "dated" was in fact really dating.
No, none of that is necessary.
Simply the fact he admitted on camera he 'dated' a sex worker is more than enough proof that someone stating 'he engaged in sex work' is a reasonable conclusion.
Dating a sex worker is engaging in sex work. The argument isn't "in which hole did he put which parts of his body?"
Did he go to Thailand? Yes, admitted.
Did he meet sex worker(s)? Yes, admitted.
Did he use a sex workers services? Yes, admitted.
It is reasonable to conclude, and state as fact, that he engaged in sex work while in thailand.
Lloyd thinks he can be pedantic about where his penis went. But no, that isn't necessary.
uh oh, looks like the mega thread gave up the ghost, so while i investigate / fix it just continue the discussion here .... it's been a long 9 years lloyd evans / john cedars.
One big glaring error he has not considered, which I hope the M7 have noted, is that he is arguing two things.
1: His Thailand trip was because of declining mental health and suicidal ideation, connected to his failing marriage also.
2: Kim and the rest of the M7 caused him mental health issues driving him to the brink of suicide with their so called 'defamation'.
They both cannot be true, since Kim did not blow the whistle till AFTER the Thailand trip- when he argues he was suicidal already.
If he provides medical information that shows he was only mentally unwell after the Thailand trip, then his claim that the M7 lied about the reasons for his trip, fail.
If he provides medical information that shows he was mentally unwell before Kim blew the whistle, then he can't argue the M7 caused it.
Checkmate, twatface.
uh oh, looks like the mega thread gave up the ghost, so while i investigate / fix it just continue the discussion here .... it's been a long 9 years lloyd evans / john cedars.
I am greatly amused that he unironically refers to the 7 as the Magnificent Seven now 😄
Interesting to refer to them as such while also branding them criminals.
Also, whats defamatory about earning 6 figures?? In most countries, defamation has to be a bad thing you're accused of... is he suddenly not proud of his income...? I thought he could spend it how he wants, just like a Doctor...?
Ahh, Lloyd. Lloyd Lloyd Lloyd. You silly boy 🤣 and you still believe croatia has jurisdiction over everyone on the Internet 🤣
uh oh, looks like the mega thread gave up the ghost, so while i investigate / fix it just continue the discussion here .... it's been a long 9 years lloyd evans / john cedars.
'Woke' isn't limited to one political side though.
To me, it means to pretend to be virtuous but actually being a hypocrite. It's cheering at the downfall of a celebrity you disagree with, but being shocked when your own behaviour is called out in the same way.
It's self righteousness, labelling yourself a Good Guy but using your own measurements to do so.
A good example would be George Takei, mega woke, used to tweet incessantly about believing all victims during the Me Too movement. Then an accusation was made against him, and he argued that you believe all victims just not the one who accused him 🤣
Lloyd is a great example because he paints himself as some almighty moral guide, know it all, crusader for the downtrodden, white Knight in shining armour, judges everyone around him etc etc. But he's actually just a large hideous sex obsessed misogynist who cannot handle an ounce of criticism directed at himself.
uh oh, looks like the mega thread gave up the ghost, so while i investigate / fix it just continue the discussion here .... it's been a long 9 years lloyd evans / john cedars.
This is not a man on a path to success
This isn't even a man on a plateau. He can't even maintain a status quo.
That's pretty impressive
uh oh, looks like the mega thread gave up the ghost, so while i investigate / fix it just continue the discussion here .... it's been a long 9 years lloyd evans / john cedars.
I fully agree re: stagnation.
It feels like he is finally in the grifting Last Days (lol)
The Internet is forever. This thread, reddit, youtube and twitter aren't going anywhere any time soon.
There is no magic wand to reinvent himself.
He fucked around and now he's finding out.
