original reddit post (removed).
Toblerone5: Why didn't he just block her ?
I don't think he can help himself. Even when he blocks people, he will read their tweets. Sometimes he will unblock them so he can make a reply, and then block them again after. His need to have the last word is a compunction that he finds as difficult to master as his penis.
Sitting at any meeting/convention/speech be like:
https://media1.tenor.com/images/fe69ac8e383a5d6249c4986194fdaf9e/tenor.gif
original reddit post (removed).
pr0ner: Have expertise in legal affairs due to extensive knowledge of Watchtower legal cases
And don't forget:
not sure if this has already been posted:.
https://kdvr.com/news/affidavit-religious-elder-abused-raped-children-for-decades/ .
The "people unprepared to deal with the issue and unwilling to seek help" was a reference to elders, not prosecutors.
Regarding "for this case," note that the line you highlighted says "men like this." In other words, not this specific case, but situations similar to it.
And none of this explains why you stated that, according to me "everybody is guilty simply because they are accused." Your explanation above does not provide anything remotely like a basis for such a blanket mischaracterization.
original reddit post (removed).
He says he has page after page explaining the defamation from each of the people he is suing. All he needs to do is release that.
not sure if this has already been posted:.
https://kdvr.com/news/affidavit-religious-elder-abused-raped-children-for-decades/ .
Fisherman: Believe what you like but you are defeated both legally and logically without evidence to substantiate.
This doesn't even make sense. I never made a legal argument. And logically, my reasoning is sound. I guess I won't get an explanation for your mischaracterization of my comment, either.
not sure if this has already been posted:.
https://kdvr.com/news/affidavit-religious-elder-abused-raped-children-for-decades/ .
Fisherman: Maybe you are right but maybe you are wrong.
Thanks, Captain Obvious.
Fisherman: Or false either You just don’t know in this case.
Which is why I specifically used the word "believe" and not "know."
Second, you said that, according to me "everybody is guilty simply because they are accused." I neither said that, nor did I imply it. Your characterization of me is incorrect, and I don't see a basis for it in anything I said.
original reddit post (removed).
Well, at least he is not charging them a fee to submit art...
geoffrey hinton, major inventor of artificial intelligence: .
“if you take the existential risk seriously, as i now do—i used to think it was way off, but now i think it’s serious, and fairly close—it might be quite sensible to just stop developing these things any further, but i think it’s completely naïve to think that would happen.
there’s no way to make that happen.
It depends on what we're referring to. There is no one all-encompassing AI, and that would be very difficult to implement even if we wanted to. But AI systems can break things, not out of a desire to do harm, but because they are not configured correctly and people come to expect them to be perfect. We're human, we learn as we go. Sometimes we have to learn the same lessons over and over.
But, yes- most of the time, the quick and easy solution is to turn it off. Very few AI systems will be able to prevent that, unless we program them to.
not sure if this has already been posted:.
https://kdvr.com/news/affidavit-religious-elder-abused-raped-children-for-decades/ .
Fisherman: Are you saying this guy is guilty even if charges were dropped and no trial to convict him?
I'm saying that I believe his accusers. Maybe this large group of disparate people with many accusations of misconduct and sexual assault over many years are making it all up. I don't think they are.
Fisherman: According to you everybody is s guilty simply because they are accused.
I didn't say that every accusation against any person is true. Where did you get that idea?
