Unsure, I think you're going to need to change your username as you seem less and less unsure of yourself with each successive post!
PS: I'm glad to know you're not coveting my ox or my donkey!
do i have to believe in jesus to be saved?.
i was raised as a jehovah's witness.
i was born in.
Unsure, I think you're going to need to change your username as you seem less and less unsure of yourself with each successive post!
PS: I'm glad to know you're not coveting my ox or my donkey!
i've created a poll here: https://goo.gl/7xburo.
i'd be interested in seeing the results.. .
#qp_main1119848 .qp_btna:hover input {background:#00355f!important} #qp_all1119848 {max-width:815px; margin:0 auto;}if watchtower scrapped the shunning policy due to "new light" and your family suddenly agreed to speak to you again would you accept them back?.
I voted YES but I have a couple of problems with the question as worded:
If Watchtower scrapped the shunning policy due to "new light" and your family suddenly agreed to speak to you again would you accept them back?
First, I couldn't "accept them back" because I have never shunned them. The shunning has always been just one-way.
So, if my recalcitrant family members that have shunned me suddenly got back in touch I would welcome them. But I would be hesitant. While I wouldn't put any conditions on our relationship, I would be cautious. I would also have no problem letting them know (when appropriate) that I was very hurt by their behavior and that--if they want to become restored to my good graces--they will have to rebuild their trust with me.
I think it's important to keep in mind that (and without absolving them of responsibility) they are victims too.
Finally, your question only allows for family members to attempt to reconcile due to a change in WT policy on shunning. Would it be different if our family members decided to reconcile in spite of no such change? I think so.
Either way, I would want an explanation for their actions then and now, but I wouldn't needlessly expect them to be hoisted with their own petard of guilt and shame as the elders do in requiring excessive shows of sorrow and repentance.
(BTW, I am neither DF'd or DA'd, just inactive, but I am shunned nevertheless due apparently to my lack of attendance at the KH and my insistence upon having a beard and wearing brightly colored socks).
do i have to believe in jesus to be saved?.
i was raised as a jehovah's witness.
i was born in.
Unsure: The more I think about it and the more I try to reason on it, the more it all just doesn't make sense.
That's because it doesn't make sense. You can't make sense out of nonsense no matter how hard you try.
Unsure: If you are a good person, you should be saved.
Why?
And who determines "good"? How "good" do you have to be? How far can you "fall short" and still be "good enough" to saved? What if you lost out on eternal salvation because of that towel you swiped from the hotel? Or the extra penny you got as change and didn't give back to the storekeeper? Or that scrap of paper you inadvertently dropped getting out of your car? Oh the horror!
It's hopeless and you'll never get an answer that is definitive because there isn't one.
And let's not forget my earlier question: Saved from what?
When I asked you for clarification about that above, you answered: Adamic sin. But it is only the Abrahamic religions that even acknowledge the Genesis story as part of their culture, and not all of them accept it as literal. Do you not see that you are coming at this question from a distinctly Christian point of view? (And a particular "Christian" one at that). This severely limits your ability to see and consider other possible answers.
Unsure: if God is love, salvation shouldn't be conditional based on belief.
According to who? Your gut. That's what you also wrote in your last post.
Do you really want to base your most important belief--one that can affect everything about how you live your life now and in anticipation of an afterlife that may or may not come true--on your "gut feeling"? That doesn't seem like a very sound way to make important, life-changing decisions.
What if it's just gas or indigestion?
What if God isn't love? (Where does THAT idea come from anyway?)
And what if there isn't any God at all?
do i have to believe in jesus to be saved?.
i was raised as a jehovah's witness.
i was born in.
Unsure: I don't understand the purpose of that last post.
To acknowledge your response. You often don't respond and when you do I try to acknowledge it.
Unsure: Is there something wrong with listening to both sides?
Of course not. In fact, there is often more than just two sides to complicated issues. Thinking there is only two sides or viewpoints creates a false dichotomy or dilemma which is a common logical fallacy. The WTBTS loves to present things as if there are only two choices, and of course of the two they present one is obviously false leaving you--the unsuspecting prey--to pick the one they always intended you to pick.
You walk away thinking you're so smart but you were played. It's Cult 101.
Life is rarely this or that, black or white (or red or blue), one or the other. There are usually many options, all with various advantages and disadvantages.
Learn to look for more alternatives than the ones presented. Think critically. Ask questions. Be skeptical of easy answers to hard problems.
do i have to believe in jesus to be saved?.
i was raised as a jehovah's witness.
i was born in.
Good to know, Unsure, good to know.
do i have to believe in jesus to be saved?.
i was raised as a jehovah's witness.
i was born in.
Unsure: Re-posting these thoughts/questions for believers in this thread.
Are those of us that are not "believers" to understand this to mean you don't want to hear what any of us have to say on the subject?
If so, then you're asking the wrong crowd.
It sounds like, since you don't like the answers you're getting, you're just going to ignore them.
hey everyone.
i don't post here often, but i lurk pretty much everyday.
i just created the following infographic based on the recent yearbook stats.
Very nice!
do i have to believe in jesus to be saved?.
i was raised as a jehovah's witness.
i was born in.
Unsure: I want to believe. I pray for whatever is out there to reveal themselves to me.
Could it be that your lack of a personal revelation is because there is no one out there to reveal themselves?
Hungarian psychiatrist, Tamás Szasz, once quipped, "If you talk to God, that's prayer. If he talks to you, that's schizophrenia."
Unsure: How am I supposed to ignore logical explanations and information and deny it and attribute it to the Divine?
Easy: Don't.
do i have to believe in jesus to be saved?.
i was raised as a jehovah's witness.
i was born in.
Now we're getting somewhere! We can put your first question together with your updated answer to mine and come up with a more complete question:
This is obviously only a question that followers of the three Abrahamic religions--Judaism, Christianity and Islam--would be concerned with. Jews and Muslims would emphatically answer, "No, you do not need to believe in Jesus." In fact, their concepts of Adamic sin and its consequences are very different than Christians', but they would want you to join their synagogue or mosque.
Of course, Christians (and I'm speaking very generally here) would almost universally say that you need to "believe in Jesus" (whatever that means) to be saved. That's their hook. Churches all have some kind of exclusivity that requires you belong to them, otherwise: what's the point?
And of course, if you asked a Hindu or a Buddhist, you'd get a completely take on the subject as they don't believe the Genesis/Garden of Eden account at all.
All of that being said, I would like you to consider a different way of looking at the question, one based on actual evidence and not religious guesswork.
Consider this: our best scientific knowledge is that anatomically modern humans have been on this planet for 100,000 to 300,000 years. Our study of evolutionary also helps us to understand that there was in fact no first human.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xdWLhXi24Mo
Although studies of mitochondrial DNA indicate that we all descended from one mother, it does not follow that we all had the same father. Either way, there was not Adam. And since there was no "Adam" there cannot have been "Adamic sin."
This whole idea of original sin was invented to make us feel bad about ourselves and eternally indebted to a God. The key point is that there has always been some priestly class that acts as intercessor on our behalf. This is how they maintain authority and control.
But the key point is: it's all a fiction.
You do not need "saving." You are human. You are what you are and that's fine. Learn to accept that and be the best version of yourself you can, but don't worry about living up to some impossibly high, unreachable standard that always keeps you feeling bad about yourself.
Repeat: You do not need saving. YOU DO NOT NEED SAVING.
You're fine just the way you are.
just wanted to share with you some good news i'm really excited about.
i have been accepted for university to study psychology and counseling.
my goal is to become a counselor and, in time, to specialize on treating those who have left high control relationships/groups like we all did.. it'll take a few years before im qualified but studying in university has been a dream of mine since i was 12, which was systematically dashed to pieces by watchtower.. .
Congrats. Don't forget your colored socks!