JC_1912: Vic Cundiff has over 248 episodes from different eyewitnesses of encounters with the Dogman. That is evidence!
Sure. Except research has shown that eyewitness accounts are notoriously unreliable (National Center for State Courts).
According to a report published in Scientific American: "Since the 1990s, when DNA testing was first introduced, Innocence Project researchers have reported that 73 percent of the 239 convictions overturned through DNA testing were based on eyewitness testimony" (Arkowitz & Lilienfeld, 2010).
Why isn't there hard evidence as in ... I don't know ... a living "dogman" or at least a corpse?
BTW, there is no such thing as THE scientific method. That's a myth. Science is a way of trying to understand nature and reality. It's a philosophical, evidence based approach to attempting to solve the mysteries of life, the universe and everything.
Here's an excellent source to get a basic idea of how science works: