in my studies, i have concluded that year 530 bc was when the destruction of jerusalem occurred and the temple destroyed.
i had determined this prior to investigation of vat4956.
i had already found that the jubilees, sabbaticals, courses of the priests, and chronology attested to this.
Jeffro,
KalebOutWest was saying they liked your work and agrees with you.
As for the Red Herring, no such thing. If there are not lunar sabbaths then that means they are according to the solar calendar. You should be able to prove those 24 courses served more than twice a year. I'll be waiting.
in my studies, i have concluded that year 530 bc was when the destruction of jerusalem occurred and the temple destroyed.
i had determined this prior to investigation of vat4956.
i had already found that the jubilees, sabbaticals, courses of the priests, and chronology attested to this.
Jeffro and KalebOutWest
Obviously, this should be easy for you. Show me where you have evidence that the 24 courses of the Priests served for more than 2 times in a year. I'm referring to those Priests such as the Sadducees or the Pharisees.
I mean that is your argument right? You know they served from Sabbath to Sabbath so this should be easy for you to prove.
in my studies, i have concluded that year 530 bc was when the destruction of jerusalem occurred and the temple destroyed.
i had determined this prior to investigation of vat4956.
i had already found that the jubilees, sabbaticals, courses of the priests, and chronology attested to this.
Trust me KalebOutWest, Jeffro, will not turn on anyone that is against me at this time. He/she needs as many people to support their position (to help support the other fallacies he/she keeps putting forward). In the end, anyone supporting Jeffro, will be wrong. I've already supported the fact that Philo of Alexandria, a contemporary of Jesus Christ IN THE 2ND TEMPLE PERIOD, had wrote about the comparison of the Sabbath to the Festivals and phases of the moon. Additionally, Josephus reported that the course of the Priests continued unto the 2nd Temple destruction with their cycles unbroken (which would not be possible had the Sabbaths aligned to the Solar Week).
in my studies, i have concluded that year 530 bc was when the destruction of jerusalem occurred and the temple destroyed.
i had determined this prior to investigation of vat4956.
i had already found that the jubilees, sabbaticals, courses of the priests, and chronology attested to this.
Me and KalebOutWest for the most part have the same information on Lunar Sabbaths in antiquity. I don't see where Jeffro has shown any distinction from what I have wrote compared to what Kaleb has stated.
I'm sorry to say this KalebOutWest but you caught in the hate beam exhibited by the soul of Jeffro. Hopefully, she continues to make amends to you.
in my studies, i have concluded that year 530 bc was when the destruction of jerusalem occurred and the temple destroyed.
i had determined this prior to investigation of vat4956.
i had already found that the jubilees, sabbaticals, courses of the priests, and chronology attested to this.
@KalebOutWest
Please excuse Jeffro for crying foul against LunarSabbaths. He/She doesn't accept this information from antiquity. But I do appreciate it.
in my studies, i have concluded that year 530 bc was when the destruction of jerusalem occurred and the temple destroyed.
i had determined this prior to investigation of vat4956.
i had already found that the jubilees, sabbaticals, courses of the priests, and chronology attested to this.
KalebOutWest:
So all this arguing over Vat 4956 is useless.I initiated my post to this forum for the purpose of showing that the 1914 idea is defeated by VAT4956. But my purpose for VAT4956 comparison is beyond the JWs. It speaks to additional evidence that the -511 (512 BCE) is the 37th year of Nebuchadnezzar and therefore is showing further the timeline that academia is using is wrong for the Neo Babylonian era.
in my studies, i have concluded that year 530 bc was when the destruction of jerusalem occurred and the temple destroyed.
i had determined this prior to investigation of vat4956.
i had already found that the jubilees, sabbaticals, courses of the priests, and chronology attested to this.
@KalebOutWest
I agree with a lot of what you stated there. However, I do not believe that that the Sabbath was only observed on the 15th of the month previously but believe from the beginning it was always observed on those phases of the moon. I know the Jewish Encyclopedia may say differently but that is what my research has shown.
Also, I do believe those sabbaths continued according to the phases of the moon at the time of the Lord Jesus in the first century AD and that the 24 courses of the Priests continued to rotate according to those Sabbaths even to the time of the destruction of the 2nd Temple as Josephus reported.
in my studies, i have concluded that year 530 bc was when the destruction of jerusalem occurred and the temple destroyed.
i had determined this prior to investigation of vat4956.
i had already found that the jubilees, sabbaticals, courses of the priests, and chronology attested to this.
I never said anything about there being no coregencies or that there were coregencies.
in my studies, i have concluded that year 530 bc was when the destruction of jerusalem occurred and the temple destroyed.
i had determined this prior to investigation of vat4956.
i had already found that the jubilees, sabbaticals, courses of the priests, and chronology attested to this.
Jeffro:
But that doesn’t say anything at all about the people of Israel. I should have specified that it says nothing relevant. (I fully accept the blame for thinking you would understand.) The 390 days isn’t about the people of Judah at all, much less its king.Yes, it is referring to the people as well. See this verse:
2Ch 12:1 And it came to pass, when Rehoboam had established the kingdom, and had strengthened himself, he forsook the law of the LORD, and all Israel with him.
And BTW, I'm not trying to lay blame. I'm trying to edify and be edified.
in my studies, i have concluded that year 530 bc was when the destruction of jerusalem occurred and the temple destroyed.
i had determined this prior to investigation of vat4956.
i had already found that the jubilees, sabbaticals, courses of the priests, and chronology attested to this.
Jeffro:
Nonsense. Gill tries that trick, but the Bible says nothing about Rehoboam's fourth year (nor of Jeroboam I).
Read all your Bible. Don't just hunt and peck.
2Ch 11:17 So they strengthened the kingdom of Judah, and made Rehoboam the son of Solomon strong, three years: for three years they walked in the way of David and Solomon.
As you can see the inequity came after the three years of Rehoboam.
Your getting schooled here.
