> "The thread is based on the assumption that scientific discoveries will tend to support an atheistic view of reality and asks how theists well respond when confronted with the new proof." Said Slimboyfat...
Nothing wrong with that "assumption" it's more of an extrapolation or estimation in what the result will be according to pattern we see here, as far as we have gone from explaining and discovering the functions of simple stuff like gravity, flight, matter composition to the development of life and astronomy, it's all consistent with the lack of belief in god/gods as we haven't found any intervention of any celestial supreme which was believed to cause all and more mentioned above in my comment.