MUSLIMS SEXUALLY ENSLAVING
CHILDREN: A GLOBAL PHENOMENON
The
sexual predation of 1,400 children in England is the tip of the iceberg.
September 3, 2014
As
shocking as the Muslim-run sex ring in Rotherham, England may seem to
some—1,400 British children as young as 11 plied with drugs before being passed
around and sexually abused in cabs and kabob shops—the fact is that this
phenomenon is immensely widespread. In the United Kingdom alone, it’s the fifth
sex abuse ring led by Muslims to be uncovered.
Some years back in Australia, a group of “Lebanese Muslim youths”
were responsible for a “series of brutal gang
rapes” of “Anglo-Celtic teenage girls.” A few years later in the
same country, four Muslim Pakistani brothers raped at least 18 Australian women,
some as young as 13. Even in the United States, a gang of Somalis—Somalia being
a Muslim nation where non-Muslims, primarily Christians, are ruthlessly
persecuted—was responsible for abducting, buying, selling, raping and torturing young American girls
as young as 12.
The question begs itself: If Muslim minorities have no fear of
exploiting “infidel” women and children in non-Muslim countries—that is, where
Muslims themselves are potentially vulnerable minorities—how are Muslims
throughout the Islamic world, where they are dominant, treating their vulnerable,
non-Muslim minorities?
The answer is a centuries-long, continents-wide account
of nonstop sexual predation. Boko Haram’s abduction and enslavement of nearly
300, mostly Christian, schoolgirls last April in Nigeria is
but the tip of the iceberg.
The difference between what happens in Nigeria and what happens in
Western nations is based on what I call “Islam’s Rule of Numbers.” Wherever Muslims grow in
numbers, Islamic phenomena intrinsic to the Muslim world—in this case, the
sexual abuse of “infidel” children and teenagers—comes along with them.
Thus in the United Kingdom, where Muslims make for a sizeable—and
notable—minority, the systematic rape of “subhuman infidels” naturally takes
place. But when caught, Muslim minorities, being under “infidel” authority, cry
“Islamophobia” and feign innocence.
In Nigeria, however, which is roughly 50 percent Islamic, such
“apologetics” are unnecessary. After seizing the nearly 300 schoolgirls, the
leader of Boko Haram appeared on videotape boasting that “I abducted your
girls. I will sell them on the market, by Allah…. There is a
market for selling humans. Allah says I should sell.”
It’s the same in Pakistan—the nation where many of the United
Kingdom’s Muslims, including the majority involved in the Rotherham sex ring,
come from. See this article for
a long list of Christian children—as young as 2-years-old—who were targeted by
Muslim men for abduction, enslavement, and rape. In every single case, police
do nothing except sometimes side with the Muslim rapists against their
“infidel” victims.
For example, last Easter Sunday, four Muslim men gang-raped a 7-year-old Christian girl named
Sara, leaving her in “critical condition.” According to Asia News, “the
police, instead of arresting the culprits, helped the local clan to kidnap the
girl’s father… to ‘force the family not to report the story, to reach an
agreement with the criminals and to avoid a dispute of a religious background.’”
As for systematic child grooming, in 2010, Kiran George, a
Christian girl who was “enslaved by a woman, Sama, a dealer of youth to be sold
as prostitutes or slaves to wealthy Muslim families,” was doused with gasoline by a police officer involved in the sex ring, set on fire,
and burned to death.
And a recent report confirms that
“an estimated 700 cases [of abduction, enslavement, and/or rape in Pakistan]
per year involve Christian women, 300 Hindu girls”—very large numbers when one
considers that Christians and Hindus each make for one percent of the
population of Pakistan, which is about 97 percent Muslim.
One can go on and on. In 2011 a Christian groupin Muslim-majority
Egypt
exposed a highly organized Muslim ring centered in the
Fatah Mosque in Alexandria. The investigation also uncovered a systematic
“religious call” plan, where young Muslim males in high school and university
are urged to approach Coptic girls in the 9-15 age
group and manipulate
them through sexual exploitation and blackmail. The plan … aims at sexually
compromising Christian girls, defiling them and humiliating them in front of
their parents, thereby forcing them to flee their homes, and use conversion to
Islam as a “solution” for their problems.
Approximately 550 Coptic Christian girls have been abducted and sexually abused by Muslim men during the last three years—especially
under the Muslim Brotherhood’s aegis, when sexual crimes were
particularly widespread.
So what animates this phenomenon of Muslim on non-Muslim
rape? And we must call it Muslim rape
since Islam is the common denominator in all these cases from otherwise diverse
nations that have little in common except for large numbers of Muslims.
As for the pedophilia aspect, Muhammad—the prophet of Islam whom
the Koran exhorts Muslims to emulate in every possible way—was “betrothed” to a
six-year-old girl, Aisha, “consummating” their marriage when she was
nine-years-old. Accordingly, Islam’s clerics routinely defend child
“marriage”—sometimes even if the girl is still in the cradle—based on the
example of the prophet.
As for the subhuman treatment of “infidel” children, this is seen as a right by supremacist Muslims. Discussing the
2010 rape of a 9-year-old Christian girl, local sources in Pakistan put it well: “It is shameful. Such incidents occur
frequently. Christian girls are considered goods to be damaged at leisure.
Abusing them is a right. According to the [Muslim] community’s mentality
it is not even a crime. Muslims regard them as spoils of war.”
“Spoils of war” is quite correct. Here is how the late Majid Khadduri,
“internationally recognized as one of the world’s leading authorities on
Islamic law and jurisprudence,” explained the idea of “spoils” in his War
and Peace in the Law of Islam:
The term spoil (ghanima)
is applied specifically to property acquired by force from non-Muslims. It
includes, however, not only property (movable and immovable) but also persons,
whether in the capacity of asra (prisoners
of war) or sabi (women and children). …
If the slave were a woman, the master was permitted to have sexual connection
with her as a concubine.
Nor is this limited to academic talk. Last year, Jordanian Sheikh Yasir al-‘Ajlawni said Muslims fighting to topple
“infidel” president Bashar Assad in Syria are permitted to “capture and have sex with” all non-Sunni women,
including Shia Muslims, Alawites, Christians, Druze, and Yazidis.
Before him, Egyptian Sheikh Ishaq Huwaini lamented
how during the heydays of Islam, “You [could] go to the market and buy her
[enslaved, infidel concubines for sale]…. In other words, when I want a
sex-slave, I go to the market and pick whichever female I desire and buy her.”
In order to eliminate sexual immorality from among male Muslim
youth, Kuwaiti political activist Salwa al-Mutairi suggested
the formal reinstitution of sex-slavery—not unlike what was recently exposed in
Rotherham. She said on video that Islam’s greatest authorities from Mecca, the
city of Islam, all confirmed the legality of sex-slavery to her.
According to the Kuwaiti woman:
A Muslim state must [first] attack a Christian
state—sorry, I mean any non-Muslim state—and they [the women, the future
sex-slaves] must be captives of the raid. Is this forbidden? Not at all;
according to Islam, sex slaves are not at all forbidden. Quite the contrary,
the rules regulating sex-slaves differ from those for free women [i.e., Muslim
women]: the latter’s body must be covered entirely, except for her face and
hands, whereas the sex-slave is kept naked from the bellybutton on up—she is
different from the free woman; the free woman has to be married properly to her
husband, but the sex-slave—he just buys her and that’s that…. For example, in
the Chechnya war, surely there are female Russian captives. So go and buy those
and sell them here in Kuwait; better that than have our men engage in forbidden
sexual relations. I don’t see any problem in this, no problem at all.”
What happened in Rotherham is hardly an aberration. Rather, it is
Islam coming to town, Muslims growing in numbers. Even Dr. Taj Hargey, a
British imam, just confirmed that the majority of the UK’s “imams promote grooming rings.” He said Muslim men
are taught that women are “second-class citizens, little more than chattels or
possessions over whom they have absolute authority” and that the imams preach a
doctrine “that denigrates all women, but treats whites with particular
contempt.”
Change “whites” to “non-Muslims”—this is not about race but
religion—and the experiences of those 1,400 children in Rotherham is one with
the experiences of countless non-Muslim minorities throughout the Islamic
world.
http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/240199/muslims-sexually-enslaving-children-global-raymond-ibrahim
