But ttdtt, leprauchans most certainly are real, check it out in this youtube vid. (link below)
Sure, Trump might call that "fake news" but we know the truth!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&persist_app=1&noapp=1&v=nda_OSWeyn8
my brother has been talking about the earth being flat and some big conspiracy going on to make people beieve otherwise.
what are people's thoughts on this?.
But ttdtt, leprauchans most certainly are real, check it out in this youtube vid. (link below)
Sure, Trump might call that "fake news" but we know the truth!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&persist_app=1&noapp=1&v=nda_OSWeyn8
my brother has been talking about the earth being flat and some big conspiracy going on to make people beieve otherwise.
what are people's thoughts on this?.
on a serious note, does anyone have a reasonable explanation as to how the atmosphere doesnt simply get siphoned off into the vacuum of space? im not pushing any FE ideas or others, just wondering.
gravity doesnt seem to be a good explanation. i know theres a pressure gradient. near the surface, an air pressure gradient results in a wind blowing in the direction of lowest pressure as the high tries to equalize with the low. why not the same from the surface to space?
i suppose if earth were contantly generating the air around us at an equal rateto theexodus into space, that would work, no one has ever suggested this though that i know of, and seems a bit silly.
my brother has been talking about the earth being flat and some big conspiracy going on to make people beieve otherwise.
what are people's thoughts on this?.
l have researched this subject and come to the conclusion that no we didn't.what do others think?.
occams razor would suggest that the moon and other sky lights are just lights. im not suggesting this but that would be simpler than everything that would have to happen for the entire universe to exist. even multiple international conspiracies would be simpler than a big bang, universal expansion, and all the rest that finally got us here billions of years later, thats extremely complex.
if occams razor were a real thing, you would have a lot of nicks and not a clean shave at all.
my brother has been talking about the earth being flat and some big conspiracy going on to make people beieve otherwise.
what are people's thoughts on this?.
i would like to take this moment to congratulate jrjw for starting what must be one of the fastest growing threads in some time.
truely bringing us all together for support and (mis)understanding.
its too bad about all the name calling and high emmotions, this is not even an emmotional topic! at least we all got to know eachother a little better though, for better or for worse.
i bet she had no idea, the can of worms she was loosing on the forum.
my recent sidewalk discussion with a couple of jw's has gotten me in the mood to say more when appropriate.so the wife and i were riding in the car and cat stevens comes on.
i mentioned to her that cat stevens left music when he was still popular and converted to islam back in the 1970's- how he was told that his music would have to be morally acceptable and he found it easier to just abandon making new music for at least 20 years.
so i didn't really remember all the details and i figured the conversation would die.
Good job, you gave her the gift that keeps on giving, like the other comments noted.
"An idea is like a virus, resilient, highly contagious.
lots of spacy questions lately so i'll add mine here.
theres a video of one of the guys on the international space station doing some experiments with a few portable cd players, using them as gyroscopes when turned on.
it was interesting to see.
Whatshallicallmyself thats interesting. does this mean that the ISS doesnt orbit the earth but rather the earth is spinning beneath it? sounds fair but the iss is supposed to be moving much faster than earth. or does it move just about 700mph in opposition to the earths rotation, causing an relative speed of about 1700 mph? in that case, i would think the hypothetical gyro-box would wind up stuck to the walls and move around a bit as it resists the change in inertia/direction.
too bad theres no way to test it here, id like to see that.
for the request for links, i consider that a little lazy since i gave an exact saerch term but here https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=p5rKDhmu37I
lots of spacy questions lately so i'll add mine here.
theres a video of one of the guys on the international space station doing some experiments with a few portable cd players, using them as gyroscopes when turned on.
it was interesting to see.
youtube, look for "iss experiment gyro" its right there (for me) theres also a few others with fire and such. this one is a bit olderthough, its just one guy. its not glam like the last few years of vids.
lots of spacy questions lately so i'll add mine here.
theres a video of one of the guys on the international space station doing some experiments with a few portable cd players, using them as gyroscopes when turned on.
it was interesting to see.
Lots of spacy questions lately so I'll add mine here. theres a video of one of the guys on the international space station doing some experiments with a few portable cd players, using them as gyroscopes when turned on. it was interesting to see. but the clips are extremely short. id have like to see a minute or more but ah well.
The question is this: given the high speed and curved path of the ISS, what should we expect to see happen with an object that has active gyros in all 3 dimensions if we were to observe for 1 minute or more?
Personally, i would have added one more on a diagonal plane to cover all the bases but that wasnt their setup.
l have researched this subject and come to the conclusion that no we didn't.what do others think?.
from what i have seen flat earthers have various oppinions on the various facets of the lights in the sky (sun/moon/stars/planets) so they dont all have the same beliefs.
for the moon landing, there is not one person here that is qualified to state that it did or did not happen, out of personal 1st hand knowledge, we can only go with our personal understanding of and willingness to believe the evidence.
on a side note, Russia, who never claimed to land men on the moon, also has a lunar reflector. without having to put a man there. so refelctors are not proof, evidence maybe but weak evidence then, unless we are willing to say Russia is covering up their own moon men. Are we saying that now? is that a thing moon landing proponents are advocating?
what i find funny, hillarious really, is that the apollo astronots couldnt remember whether space was soo dark or soo bright with stars.
its too bad those pics from luna didnt show the milkyway. you can see it from earth, i really would have liked to see it from the moons POV. but maybe its because those cameras were not made to be used in a harsh environment like space, thats straight from the manufacurers mouth but maybe thats why they didnt pick up stars and galaxies and why the shadows are at funny angles sometimes.
Oh and recent videos from our NASA friends have stated that they are still trying to figure out how to safely get through the van allen belt, and that once they figure that out, the can go further out into space like to the moon and beyond. damn all this doublespeak, feels like the Watchtower has taught the govs to speak just like them.
for those who would say "prove it" to the statement above, do i really have to hand those things to you on a silver platter? its so easy to find, if i have to hand it to you, you are being intellectually lazy.