Lots of people conveniently want to exclude the initial catalyst.
I'm more than happy to admit that there is evidence of evolution.
You are unwilling to admit that intelligence could have kicked off the whole thing.
Just because not knowing this initial driver doesn't fit your narrative doesn't mean it doesn't matter.
It's like taking any animate object and saying well it's chemical makeup proves no on had a hand in making it. You simply can't make that claim without proving that it's makeup can come about by happenstance.
We need to know the catalyst to rule out that intelligence was not involved.
That's how I see it. I don't see how this is unreasonable.