your qualifications are way above mine so i'd love to hear more about the specifics of what you have researched and how that supports the existence of a deity.
k99, i am not really convinced that you're interested in my conclusions.
in nature amino acids formed to then form dna.
Yes you can. Evolution is the accepted status quo. All advancements are refinements to the theory.
Accepted by who? Very blanket statement that cannot be attributed to all scientists.
There has been no advancement in the answer to how RNA became DNA. If you have the study where definitive refinement has been made please disclose.
your qualifications are way above mine so i'd love to hear more about the specifics of what you have researched and how that supports the existence of a deity.
k99, i am not really convinced that you're interested in my conclusions.
in nature amino acids formed to then form dna.
@OrphanCrow many theories just like this one are ultimately proven wrong. Of this entire discussion this much is absolute FACT cannot be disputed.
As such indeterminate possibilities yet to be fleshed out are certainly on the table. Science is the pursuit of knowledge by study and experimental tests related to those studies.
So if there are no indeterminate possibilities what the heck are you testing?
To not consider "other" or the unknown is to fall into the trap discussed in this article.
https://www.theguardian.com/science/occams-corner/2013/sep/17/scientific-studies-wrong
wow, this is awesome.
this really shows the jw passiveness towards child sex abusers.
there needs to be more of this exposing this!.
Seems like most of these situations are with those whose offense happened in the 80's or before the mid 90's. At least it appears that way.
They may have been lost in the shuffle but that's simply no excuse as there is nothing more precious than children. Nothing.
your qualifications are way above mine so i'd love to hear more about the specifics of what you have researched and how that supports the existence of a deity.
k99, i am not really convinced that you're interested in my conclusions.
in nature amino acids formed to then form dna.
@Landy maybe I'm not being clear but I completely agree with your statements.
I'm actually saying you CANNOT assume God just because we are unaware of this charge/event that sprung life into motion.
The problem is that you cannot assume Evolution either for the very same reason.
@cofty I have no issue with LUCA zero. However you're leaving out an important part which the hard and fast types like to do it seems....how the hell did you get to the first universal ancestor?
Honestly I don't get the hostility...if you can prove how RNA became DNA how amino acids were charged beginning the chaining of life you'll get a Nobel Price if you can't you MUST accept other possibilities and that is really all I'm saying.
To be very clear I'm not saying either are right. i think we need more questions answered. I suspect some day when it is all solved we'll find there's something involved that no one thought of before. Usually works that way in the end. Meaning the answer might be right in front of everyone.
your qualifications are way above mine so i'd love to hear more about the specifics of what you have researched and how that supports the existence of a deity.
k99, i am not really convinced that you're interested in my conclusions.
in nature amino acids formed to then form dna.
@Landy then why bring up hypotheses? Evolution is a theory.
You categorically cannot prove/disprove Evolution/Creation until you can define how RNA became DNA. How those amino acids became charge which began the proto-chaining of life.
Creationists want to stick to well how else could it have happened.
Evolutionists want to ignore this charge/event that began life.
Everyone would do well to not talk semantics and get to the core issue. What the hell was the catalyst. If you don't want to discuss this I'm out. This is the topic to debate not all this ancilary crap as it means zero without knowing what charged those amino acids so long ago.
Remember....closing your mind means you've stopped looking for the answers!
your qualifications are way above mine so i'd love to hear more about the specifics of what you have researched and how that supports the existence of a deity.
k99, i am not really convinced that you're interested in my conclusions.
in nature amino acids formed to then form dna.
...and for the record closed minded people are not good scientists.
People who are less confident in their beliefs are more reluctant than others to seek out opposing perspectives, researchers said today. - LiveScience
your qualifications are way above mine so i'd love to hear more about the specifics of what you have researched and how that supports the existence of a deity.
k99, i am not really convinced that you're interested in my conclusions.
in nature amino acids formed to then form dna.
Uhhh evolution is a theory my dear. NOT a hypothesis but nice effort.
your qualifications are way above mine so i'd love to hear more about the specifics of what you have researched and how that supports the existence of a deity.
k99, i am not really convinced that you're interested in my conclusions.
in nature amino acids formed to then form dna.
@Viviane well I know what my professor preached.
Often it's more about what you don't know than what you do.
Ruling things out as you build your theory comprised of other facts is absolutely part of the scientific process of defining a theory. I don't know where you studied but...
your qualifications are way above mine so i'd love to hear more about the specifics of what you have researched and how that supports the existence of a deity.
k99, i am not really convinced that you're interested in my conclusions.
in nature amino acids formed to then form dna.
Confused by the "America" comment one given that many around the world clamor to attend Harvard, Berkley, Stanford, Yale among others every year.
Americans first to land on moon, created the internet, source of most technological advances today, Russia a close second.
This isn't about patriotism but to act as though U.S. schools are somehow not credited or to demean their statements is well...ignorant.
can i please ask people not to repeated signatures on their posts.. i have pm'd a few people directly with the request as i've noticed them but i guess the inevitable "explain why / show it's fair" means i need to make it publicly to all .... everyone's name and avatar is already displayed next to each post made so anything added at the bottom is really superfluous and just reduces readability on smaller devices where screen-real-estate is already at a premium.
if the layout is redesigned for mobile devices with the poster name at the bottom then it looks kind-of stupid (e.g.
"said simon - simon ...").
Been said but again these signatures are really bio's in short if I want to see your bio I should have to click on your avatar, a modal pops and I can read and close it.
There is zero need for a bio to be at the bottom of a post which simply takes up chars and lines.
With Si on this 200%.
