Thanks for sharing this. What I find interesting is that the WT in fact does have a point in terms of not using, replacing and/or minimizing the use of blood in medical treatment, but they do it for their own selfish purposes and reasons.
In medicine there are issues with using blood for certain purposes and now they are using other methods when possible, but not because of the WT. Their reasons are:
- Money of course is the number one reason. The cost of getting, treating, processing, maintaining, transporting, delivering and administering blood is way higher than alternatives, not to mention tracing and tracking transfusion-related adverse events and incidents, both infectious and non-infectious, that affect blood donors and recipients.
- Technology and advances in medicine. There are new technologies, products and procedures that can be used instead of administering blood (directly or by derivatives) for certain treatments, reducing the risk of post-transfusion reactions, and/or contaminated blood.
- Low supply/high demand. Blood banks always have to deal with the issue of having enough blood. It is in the best interest of medicine to have alternatives.
The WT wants to take credit for the medical field making advances in finding alternatives to blood transfusions, when the reality is that it's just a common interest that they have with the WT, only the WT uses that to their advantage and to claim that they are in fact influencing medicine (which is laughable).