Very apologist and the proof-reading of the Grammar is pretty bad for a Masters Thesis - lots of errors.
Also there are no real conclusions drawn that could be regarded as new / remarkable / food for thought etc
Especially biased are her views regarding the "errors" that WT have made - as brought out in the Walsh Case - as being no big deal and an almost natural consequence of being imperfect men ! ?
It is therefore no surprise that she admits to having been at odd with James Pentons works on certain issues.