putting this under "friends" because i couldn't figure out where to put it.
it is very often on here and in ex jw videos, ect that people like to undermine some of those who once we would have called friends.
there seems to be a view that window washers, plumbers, cleaners, construction workers are somehow less intelligent than those who may be college educated.
"I don't think this labeling is in anyway kind or accurate. Are these ones really inferior people? Or are others just Proud!"
I have no training in aeronautical engineering. want me to build your airplane?
I know of one JW who was in the cleaning business who invented a machine for cleaning and became a millionaire!
the "independent scotland" thread got me thinking on this.
there are a lot of brits on this board.
what are your thoughts on brexit?
And where is the open debate on whether we want to be involved in this war in Ukraine? We have no choice in the matter we are dragged into it without a vote and whether we like it or not.
the "independent scotland" thread got me thinking on this.
there are a lot of brits on this board.
what are your thoughts on brexit?
The "independent scotland" thread got me thinking on this.
There are a lot of Brits on this board. What are your thoughts on Brexit? Has your life become better? What burden's have been lifted from you? Have there been any drawbacks?
this scientist is perhaps revealing way too much for his own good.
very courageous.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gad8qewjgly.
any opinions are just speculation, but my guess, being morbid, is that there was not a hull breach and implosion (although that would have been the most merciful fate for them), but instead the amateur level of building this thing meant that it lost power and communication and got itself tangled in the titanic's wreckage or is sitting on the actual seabed with no way to release ballast to resurface.
terrifying.
what's your gut feeling?
"I even said to a few people that it was a media smokescreen for something else."
Not EVERYTHING is a conspiracy. Sometimes it's just laziness. The sub story was on both conservative and liberal news outlets. Sometimes stories get blown up simply for the gawk factor.
In the summer of 2001 it was GW Bush in office and it was constant "breaking news" about every shark attack. Even a minor bite needing a few stitches. There were no more attacks than any other summer, but for a while it got eyes on the screen every time there was more "breaking news".
Really? Smokescreen for Biden? How would that work? They pull the heads of every news organization of every slant to a meeting at the whitehouse and lay out this nefarious plan? They even get right wing British tabloids to go along with it?
a good question is would you be more happy not knowing what you now know?.
were you more happy pimi?
are all the pimis more happy than the the pimos or the pomos?.
"That’s the wrong way round. Primates didn’t evolve from hominoids, hominoids evolved from early primates."
Right you are.
But the larger point of common ancestry still stands.
a good question is would you be more happy not knowing what you now know?.
were you more happy pimi?
are all the pimis more happy than the the pimos or the pomos?.
"People who say the term ape is “unhelpful” if used that way - Coft"
It is unhelpful. Because it gives rise to dumb questions like "if humans evolved from ape's, then why are there still apes?"
Humans, chimps, gorillas are all apes. We are different branches that all descended from a common hominoid ancestor. Go even further back and all primates including monkeys will have a common ancestor. (all apes are primates, but not all primates are apes)
You can keep carrying it back and eventually you'll reach a common ancestor of all mammals. You can carry this even farther back until you reach a common single celled ancestor of all life on earth.
any opinions are just speculation, but my guess, being morbid, is that there was not a hull breach and implosion (although that would have been the most merciful fate for them), but instead the amateur level of building this thing meant that it lost power and communication and got itself tangled in the titanic's wreckage or is sitting on the actual seabed with no way to release ballast to resurface.
terrifying.
what's your gut feeling?
"Wasn't the CEO one of the passengers on this trip?"
Yes. He was the one piloting it.
"the craft was designed to reach depths of 4,000 meters (13,123 feet),
where the Titanic rested. But, according to Lochridge, the passenger
viewport was only certified for depths of up to 1,300 meters (4,265
feet), and OceanGate would not pay for the manufacturer to build a
viewport certified for 4,000 meters."
I dont think he was right in the head..
He was quoted as stating his worst fear was a situation where he could not ascend to the surface. You'd think his worst fear would be descending to 3X the depth the viewport was rated for.
any opinions are just speculation, but my guess, being morbid, is that there was not a hull breach and implosion (although that would have been the most merciful fate for them), but instead the amateur level of building this thing meant that it lost power and communication and got itself tangled in the titanic's wreckage or is sitting on the actual seabed with no way to release ballast to resurface.
terrifying.
what's your gut feeling?
"Just more casulties of wokeness. The CEO wanted to be "inspirational"
and "50 year old white guys" aren't so he didn't hire them."
Try again. The CEO was a big time Republican donor and general shiatty person. More like, he didn't want to pay experienced 55 year old engineers what they were asking and they didn't want to take a ride in his suicide tube.
any opinions are just speculation, but my guess, being morbid, is that there was not a hull breach and implosion (although that would have been the most merciful fate for them), but instead the amateur level of building this thing meant that it lost power and communication and got itself tangled in the titanic's wreckage or is sitting on the actual seabed with no way to release ballast to resurface.
terrifying.
what's your gut feeling?
"Things like a secondary power and/or propulsion source, or a backup means of communicating with another vessel or the surface, should be the minimum safety for a deep-sea diving vessel such as this."
I read that normally on these types of deep sea mini subs subs, the ballast (weights) that allow the vessel to sink to the ocean floor are held in place on the bottom of the sub with electro-magnets, so in the event of power loss, the magnets shut off, the ballast automatically drops and the ship ascends back to the surface. Since they are on the bottom, this works even if you're sitting on the ocean floor. Sounds like a pretty clever way to do things.
However on the lost sub: "the ballast is abandoned construction pipes that are sitting on shelves
on the side of the thing, and the way you detach the ballast is you get
everybody on-board to lean to one side of the sub and they roll off"
The problem with this is obvious. If you're sitting flat on the ocean floor with no power, you're not gonna be able to rock the sub side to side to have the ballast roll off. Seems like in addition to all the other questionable design decisions, just learning that this is your method of getting back home would cause any potential passengers to say 'oh hell no'.
