Posts by Macho

259

The Gentile Times Reconsidered (607 B.C.E.) -Part A1 - Jeremiah 25:10-12 Reviewed

by FaceTheFacts in

during the last three to four months, i have spent a great deal of time sinking my teeth into various critical biblical commentaries and lexicons.

naturally, after beginning to research "the truth about the truth" one of the most commonplace yet controversial arguments revolve around the "gentile times" doctrine (i.e.

the application of the seven times of daniel 4 from 607 b.c.e.

Macho

Whew. Ive had a good laugh but NOTHING is funnier than someone knowing a question exposes their fallacy in reasoning but adamantly refusing to answer it.

NOTHING is funnier than watching someone who knows nothing about a language, try to argue against it. It doesnt get much more idiotic and embarassing than that.

And he tried to argue "all the nations" didnt go into exile but only specific ones listed in Jeremiah 27 did not knowing that all is idiomatic and only has to signify a shbstantial numbet.

He even tried to say I was comparing two entirely diffetent verbs, completely oblivious to the fact that doulos is also rendered destroy and hat I was not comparing two different verbs but various renderinga of one.

Hoffnug tried to post a chronicle showing that Babylon got spoil from the nations it conquered completely unaware of what vassalage meant and AnnoMaly indirectly showed vassalages didnt take place until AFTER Carchemish.

Wow....this is just too funny.I think Simon deleted me to stop them from any further embarassment.

259

The Gentile Times Reconsidered (607 B.C.E.) -Part A1 - Jeremiah 25:10-12 Reviewed

by FaceTheFacts in

during the last three to four months, i have spent a great deal of time sinking my teeth into various critical biblical commentaries and lexicons.

naturally, after beginning to research "the truth about the truth" one of the most commonplace yet controversial arguments revolve around the "gentile times" doctrine (i.e.

the application of the seven times of daniel 4 from 607 b.c.e.

Macho

bLMAO!!!! Thank you for showing me how embarassingly painful it is to see your own ridiculous line of reasoning is. I dont think Ive ever seen you in such bad shape. Have all the hours of sitting by, waiting for my every response to his thread, depleted your brain cells? Or has it been that you foolishly believed the superficial arguments of Carl Jonnson?

Goodbye for good. You truly are a joke

259

The Gentile Times Reconsidered (607 B.C.E.) -Part A1 - Jeremiah 25:10-12 Reviewed

by FaceTheFacts in

during the last three to four months, i have spent a great deal of time sinking my teeth into various critical biblical commentaries and lexicons.

naturally, after beginning to research "the truth about the truth" one of the most commonplace yet controversial arguments revolve around the "gentile times" doctrine (i.e.

the application of the seven times of daniel 4 from 607 b.c.e.

Macho

Why can't you answer a simple question? I can't get a going away present?

259

The Gentile Times Reconsidered (607 B.C.E.) -Part A1 - Jeremiah 25:10-12 Reviewed

by FaceTheFacts in

during the last three to four months, i have spent a great deal of time sinking my teeth into various critical biblical commentaries and lexicons.

naturally, after beginning to research "the truth about the truth" one of the most commonplace yet controversial arguments revolve around the "gentile times" doctrine (i.e.

the application of the seven times of daniel 4 from 607 b.c.e.

Macho

I am happy to leave. This site is trash and you know it.

259

The Gentile Times Reconsidered (607 B.C.E.) -Part A1 - Jeremiah 25:10-12 Reviewed

by FaceTheFacts in

during the last three to four months, i have spent a great deal of time sinking my teeth into various critical biblical commentaries and lexicons.

naturally, after beginning to research "the truth about the truth" one of the most commonplace yet controversial arguments revolve around the "gentile times" doctrine (i.e.

the application of the seven times of daniel 4 from 607 b.c.e.

Macho

You never answered the question: Is this rendering correct? "The nations will destroy Babylon for seventy years". Yes or NO. Why or why not.

"You're never very good at this." - coming from the person who tried to debate about a language he knows NOTHING about. Says the person who embarassed himself repeatedly by making woefully ignorant arguments about Hebrew grammar and lack of knowledge about the idiomatic usage of "all" in Hebrew. Says the person who STILL hasnt been able to show us an alternate rendering of Jeremiah 25:11 by a single LXX translation.

Jeffro...it is you who should give it up. I wouldnt be surprised if you DONT join the forum to continue the discussion...as its already been embarassing for you and your braindead cronies wont hold your hand and ignore your nonsensical blusters.

259

The Gentile Times Reconsidered (607 B.C.E.) -Part A1 - Jeremiah 25:10-12 Reviewed

by FaceTheFacts in

during the last three to four months, i have spent a great deal of time sinking my teeth into various critical biblical commentaries and lexicons.

naturally, after beginning to research "the truth about the truth" one of the most commonplace yet controversial arguments revolve around the "gentile times" doctrine (i.e.

the application of the seven times of daniel 4 from 607 b.c.e.

Macho

Jeffro...if you arent tired of making a fool of yourself, sign up at TheologyWeb. You think this embarassing excuse for a forum has debates? Wait til you get there.I didnt say it was figurative or symbolic, I am simply pointing out to you your lack of knowledge about the use of "all" in Hebrew. Its embarassing (again) for you.

259

The Gentile Times Reconsidered (607 B.C.E.) -Part A1 - Jeremiah 25:10-12 Reviewed

by FaceTheFacts in

during the last three to four months, i have spent a great deal of time sinking my teeth into various critical biblical commentaries and lexicons.

naturally, after beginning to research "the truth about the truth" one of the most commonplace yet controversial arguments revolve around the "gentile times" doctrine (i.e.

the application of the seven times of daniel 4 from 607 b.c.e.

Macho

259

The Gentile Times Reconsidered (607 B.C.E.) -Part A1 - Jeremiah 25:10-12 Reviewed

by FaceTheFacts in

during the last three to four months, i have spent a great deal of time sinking my teeth into various critical biblical commentaries and lexicons.

naturally, after beginning to research "the truth about the truth" one of the most commonplace yet controversial arguments revolve around the "gentile times" doctrine (i.e.

the application of the seven times of daniel 4 from 607 b.c.e.

Macho

Wow...Jeffro. Those same old tired arguments about "all the nations" not going into exile but only specific individual condemned nations? I have already explained to you on page one that "all" is idiomatic in Hebrew and is often used to convey a significant or substantiated amount. I already proved to you that a sinificant amount of nations were exiled to augment Neb's military force by the time of Jerusalem's destruction and thus the prophecy doesnt require that EVERY nation go into exile simultaneously but that a substantiated amount are all serving as slaves at any point during the seventy years.

Sidenote: FaceTheFacts here. Apparently I was banned in the middle of having a debate (what a shocker!). Ive come to realize this forum has no value for me, since the people dont even read your arguments but would just like to believe what they want. Thereare far BETTER, scholarly, debate platforms out there. This site has deteriorated into an intellectual waseland and is simply a daycare for scared adults too weak and powerless to deal with their own problems.

If anyone is interested, TheologyWeb is where you should go. I'll be posting under the name Agnosco and we can continue the discussion there.