Read what? Just another claim?
Fact: The Lincoln Crew put up the banner, not Bush.
Fact: Bush never said "MA" when addressing the Lincoln.
Teejays claim is false.
Posts by ThiChi
-
149Tons Of Iraq Explosives Missing
by teejay intons of iraq explosives missing
material could be used as nuclear trigger .
cnn) -- some 380 tons of explosives powerful enough to detonate nuclear warheads are missing from a former iraqi military facility that was supposed to be under american control, the u.n.'s nuclear watchdog says.
-
-
-
149
Tons Of Iraq Explosives Missing
by teejay intons of iraq explosives missing
material could be used as nuclear trigger .
cnn) -- some 380 tons of explosives powerful enough to detonate nuclear warheads are missing from a former iraqi military facility that was supposed to be under american control, the u.n.'s nuclear watchdog says.
-
-
ThiChi
One story gives the issue some context:
""The nuclear agency pulled out of Iraq in 1998, and by the time it returned in 2002, it confirmed that 35 tons of HMX that had been placed under IAEA seal were missing. HMX and RDX are the key components in plastic explosives, which insurgents have widely used in a series of bloody car bombings in Iraq.""
They admit the HMX and RDX could have been moved before the invasion.
-
149
Tons Of Iraq Explosives Missing
by teejay intons of iraq explosives missing
material could be used as nuclear trigger .
cnn) -- some 380 tons of explosives powerful enough to detonate nuclear warheads are missing from a former iraqi military facility that was supposed to be under american control, the u.n.'s nuclear watchdog says.
-
-
ThiChi
This is old news, notice how there are no dates listed on the reports? Do you know why no dates are listed? My God, what do you take us for?
Your story really begs the question.....
Why don't you just admit Bush did not state what you claim on the Lincon?
When taken in context and truth, the rubbish really stands out!!
Nice try
Dates, please....
-
65
What Are You All Reading?!
by Doubtfully Yours inso, what's everybody reading these days?.
i used to read so passionately, but i've lost the hobby due to everyday life stress and distractions.
i want to get back into reading again.
-
-
ThiChi
The Rise of Theodore Roosevelt (before Bed, almost done, ready for Theodore Rex)
The Complete Dead Sea Scrolls (Sunday Afternoons)
Rereading Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas (On my Lunch Break)
-
149
Tons Of Iraq Explosives Missing
by teejay intons of iraq explosives missing
material could be used as nuclear trigger .
cnn) -- some 380 tons of explosives powerful enough to detonate nuclear warheads are missing from a former iraqi military facility that was supposed to be under american control, the u.n.'s nuclear watchdog says.
-
-
ThiChi
This old news. One should ask, "why is old news (19 months old) " being recycled now? And it does not state when the explosives went missing. One important fact. One source states that the explosives went missing before the US even showed up, which your story did not report.....did you know that?
Notwithstanding, your "Mission Accomplished" photo is misleading and just plain wrong.
Did you know that the "Mission Accomplished" banner was put up by the members of the USS Abraham Lincoln? After doing a tour of duty in two theaters of war, they were now going home, Mission Accomplished.
Did you know that Bush never stated "Mission Accomplished" in his speech on the Lincoln, which photo you wrongly have used stating he had?
Like Kerry, it seems you have some honesty issues....
Kerry said he met Security Council members. They deny it. He said he saw the Buckner play at Shea Stadium in '86. He wasn't there...
-
9
Hindsight is 20/20
by Capn Jack ini have been watching this website for a while and havent posted much, but i have gained alot of insight into my own head and life.
i was born jw and pioneered and all that good stuff, didnt get out until i was 23. didnt know what to do so i started drinking and using all sorts of illegal substances.
i would talk all night to people about the 'dubs and how f****d up they are, probably bored alot of people.
-
-
ThiChi
Good points...
-
-
-
ThiChi
""Our? Is that like 'them' or 'they'? What do you mean 'our'. Define the grouping of people you mean by 'our'. How large a group of people do you mean by 'our'? Is it the 20% of Americans who control 40% of the countries wealth? If not, who? We aren't talking about welfare mothers, are we? "" lol. You can't meet the logic test, so lets argue non-issues. Fine. Since we are a Republic form of government, not a Democracy, It is our elected leaders who make the decisions for the US. Notwithstanding a majority support our leaders on this as a single issue. The raddacal left is in the miniorty. The ladies and Gentlemen of the Armed Services support President 4 to 1 over Karry......To claim the "world" feels this way or that way is really unknowable and is a false claim. Their are Billions that were not "polled". I can tell you who this does exclude: "...those cold and timid souls who knew neither victory nor defeat...."
-
80
Is Global Warming a Myth?
by Sirona ini've been reading about global warming recently and to be honest its getting more confusing by the minute.. some say there is so much evidence that it is caused by humans (burning of fossil fuels etc) but some say that it is a natural cycle that we shouldn't worry about.. http://www.junkscience.com/news/robinson.htm.
what is the truth?
are you concerned about our planet?.
-
-
ThiChi
Here is what you said: ""But even the 'smallest' things we do (the switch to unleaded petrol lead to massive drop in numbers of predatory birds preying on small mammals by highways in the UK, DDT, the sparrow population in the UK is 5% it was twenty year ago and no one knows why, Chernobyl) have an impact." The claim I addressed is clear. You made a false claim that "no one knows why.." I did not even touch the implication/context you were trying to pass on us. I proved that this was false (like most of your claims). Why don't you just suck it up and admit it? """You do realise there is no credible evidence for your claim?"" lol there you go agian!!! I give up!! lol Cicatrix: One can tell you did not read the information posted. If you did, you would have realized that your point is lacking Historical geologic perspective.....Please read the evidence presented....
-
-
-
ThiChi
Wow, look who wants Bush out too........
Putin: Bush Re-Election Target of Iraq Attacks
Monday, October 18, 2004
DUSHANBE, Tajikistan ? Russian President Vladimir Putin ( search ) said Monday that terrorists are aiming to derail U.S. President George W. Bush's chances at re-election through their attacks in Iraq.
"I consider the activities of terrorists in Iraq are not as much aimed at coalition forces but more personally against President Bush," Putin said at a news conference after a regional summit in the Tajik capital, Dushanbe.
"International terrorism has as its goal to prevent the election of President Bush to a second term," he said. "If they achieve that goal, then that will give international terrorism a new impulse and extra power."
Still, Putin didn't say which candidate he favored in the Nov. 2 U.S. presidential election.
"We unconditionally respect any choice of the American people," he said. "I don't want to spoil relations with either candidate."
Putin also noted his continuing disagreement with Bush on Washington's invasion of Iraq, which Russia strongly opposed as a permanent member of the U.N. Security Council.
"Russia was always against the military operations in Iraq," he said.
Despite their differences, Bush and Putin have cooperated closely in the international war on terror, with Russia assenting to the deployment of U.S. forces in former Soviet Central Asia for operations in neighboring Afghanistan. In exchange, Washington has mostly looked the other way on Moscow's continuing war in breakaway Chechnya, which Russia alleges is being fueled by international terror groups.
On his last visit to Central Asia in June, Putin appeared to be backing Bush's assertion that Iraq was a threat, saying at a summit in Kazakhstan that Russia had notified Washington about intelligence that Saddam Hussein's regime was preparing attacks in the United States and its interests abroad.
No further details were given, and Putin also said then that the warning didn't change Moscow's opposition to the Iraq war.
-
-
-
ThiChi
TeeJay: here, posted agian, is the reason(s) Bush went to War::::
Critics like you ignore uncomfortable facts such as this from President Bush's speech to the United Nations on September 12, 2002. Bush mentions weapons of mass destruction briefly, and then cites Iraq's support for terrorism, its persecution of civilians, its failure to obey Security Council resolutions, "release or account for all Gulf War personnel," return the remains and return stolen property, "accept liability for losses resulting from the invasion of Kuwait and fully cooperate with international efforts to resolve these issues, as required by Security Council resolutions." Bush cited the Oil for Food program, which turned out to be Kofi Annan's private Enron.
You want more? "If the Iraqi regime wishes peace it will immediately end all illicit trade outside the oil-for-food program. It will accept UN administration of funds from that program to ensure that the money is used fairly and promptly for the benefit of the Iraqi people. If all these steps are taken, it will signal a new openness and accountability in Iraq, and it could open the prospect of the United Nations helping to build a government that represents all Iraqis." On March 17 of 2003, Bush delivered his final ultimatum to Saddam Hussein.
The president talked a lot about weapons of mass destruction in that speech, but he also addressed all these other concerns from supporting terrorism (Has the left also forgotten the Salmon Pak terrorist training facility?) to repressing the Iraqi people. When the president addressed the Iraqi people, he didn't mention a word about WMD. He talked about freedom. Those focusing exclusively on the WMDs are simply desperate, out-of-power people seeking to inflict any damage they can on Bush. What's shocking is that they're the same people who always honored themselves by speaking out in favor of human rights, yet they would've left the Iraqi people to the tender mercies of Saddam's thugs rather than see them liberated by this president.
