Marvin,
By assuming God has appointed a FDS you give the GB authority which is biblically incorrect.
I've been wondering why the WTBTS always references Matthew when discussing the "Faithful and Discreet Salve". You can find the same parable in Luke as well. In Luke the FDS story is preceeded by a question: "Then Peter said unto him, Lord, speakest thou this parable unto us, or even to all?". While the WT often presents the FDS parable as a question that needs to be answered, Luke shows that the parable IS an answer; an answer to Peter's question concerning the PREVIOUS parable. Knowing this, I searched for the FIRST parable preceeding the FDS parable. Here they are from Matt. & Luke:
Mat24:43 But know this, that if the goodman of the house had known in what watch the thief would come, he would have watched, and would not have suffered his house to be broken up.
Luke12:38 And if he shall come in the second watch, or come in the third watch, and find them so, blessed are those servants. Luke12:39 And this know, that if the goodman of the house had known what hour the thief would come, he would have watched, and not have suffered his house to be broken through.
The bold areas show the similarities.
I then searched Mark for the first parable and compared it to Luke:
Mark13:35 Watch ye therefore: for ye know not when the master of the house cometh, at even, or at midnight, or at the cockcrowing, or in the morning: Mark13:36 Lest coming suddenly he find you sleeping.
Luke12:38 And if he shall come in the second watch, or come in the third watch, and find them so, blessed are those servants. Luke12:39 And this know, that if the goodman of the house had known what hour the thief would come, he would have watched, and not have suffered his house to be broken through.
The bold areas show the similarities. All the above verses preceed the FDS parable in Matt., Mark, and Luke. While Matt. makes it appear that the FDS is a whole new story, Luke shows it is just an explanation of the first parable because of a question from Peter. His question threatens the claim that the GB is the FDS: "Lord, speakest thou this parable unto us, or even to all?".
The answer in Matthew and Luke is presented by Jesus as a parable (the FDS parable). But Mark provided a plain and clear answer:
Luke12:41 Then Peter said unto him, Lord, speakest thou this parable unto us, or even to all?
Mark13:37 And what I say unto you I say unto all, Watch.
By sticking to Matt., the WT has chosen the vaguest version of this parable, one which allows them to present it as a question that only they can answer. But, Mark has already provided a clear answer, if you're willing to look for it. In the Insight book the following scriptures are listed to justify the WT's arguement concerning the FDS: Mt 25:14-30; Tit 1:7-9, Isa 43:10, 1Jo 2:18; 2Jo 7, Eph 2:19; 1Ti 3:15, 1Co 3:2, 5; 4:1, 2; compare Mt 4:4, 1Pe 1:1, 2; 4:10, 11, Mt 24:45; Heb 3:6; Eph 2:19, Heb 5:11-14; compare 1Co 12:12, 19-27, Mt 24:46, 47; Lu 12:43, 44.
This wild goose chase leads the reader far from the simple answer that can be found by comparing the gospels. John is the only gospel not to address the parable that proceeds the FDS. However he did comment on the possiblity of the apostles being considered "servants": John15:15 Henceforth I call you not servants; for the servant knoweth not what his lord doeth: but I have called you friends; for all things that I have heard of my Father I have made known unto you.
Clearly the FDS is ALL. (Mark 13:37)