despite my often smart-ass exterior, i really don't have any desire to see the r&f dubs suffering.
i really do worry about the mental and emotional turmoil that they will experience, if and when the wtbts is truly exposed as a scam.
i know it seems unlikely to happen, but you never know..... anyway, the wt for the week was cringe-worthy to say the least.
ctrwtf13 minutes agoThe ancients weren't stupid. They could observe the moon and come to the same conclusion.
or the fuzzy outline of the Earth projected in a lunar eclipse. with Atlas, or turtles conspicuous by their absence. The bible has more statements of the socle, basis of the Earth, it's pillars, it's four corners than that one lucky hit, the nothing of energy.
despite my often smart-ass exterior, i really don't have any desire to see the r&f dubs suffering.
i really do worry about the mental and emotional turmoil that they will experience, if and when the wtbts is truly exposed as a scam.
i know it seems unlikely to happen, but you never know..... anyway, the wt for the week was cringe-worthy to say the least.
unimaginative wt writers. How about taken a string, attach a little pail, with water in it, ask the child could the water be suspended above the ground , even inside the upside down pail, with nothing underneath? then swing it around in circle. energetically. it is energy that suspends the earth. against the gravity of the Sun. good laws. but
then you spoil it all by belief in talking snakes, walking on water, corpses walking into jerusalem-- and the hope--
there are many on this site that do not believe that jehovah truly exists; that he is not a real being.
but, he is as real as next breath you draw into your nostrils.. some of you say that there is no evidence that he exists.
yet, none of you can prove that he does not exits.. cofty, (you come to mind), i appreciate that you have stated, without reservation, that you do not believe that god exists.. yet, you cannot prove it.. hope in jehovah..
Da war der Fucks, ein blinder Heid'
is the "F" word not off limits on an english language site?
there are many on this site that do not believe that jehovah truly exists; that he is not a real being.
but, he is as real as next breath you draw into your nostrils.. some of you say that there is no evidence that he exists.
yet, none of you can prove that he does not exits.. cofty, (you come to mind), i appreciate that you have stated, without reservation, that you do not believe that god exists.. yet, you cannot prove it.. hope in jehovah..
TWoY: "--Mit tiefer Ehrfurcht schau ich die Schöpfung an,
Denn Du!
Namenloser, Du!
Schufest sie!
Here the 16st century poet calls the creator "nameless"
"--Hört ihr Jehova's Donner?
here Jehovah is identified with the lesser deity THOR the hammer throwing thunder god of the nordics. This is all poetic nonsense, just like much of the bible.
If the bible is the word of god, he would never have allowed Gen1:1 to be written, to be proven wrong . to be thereby proven to be a non Jehovah bible god.
The errors in the bible are proof that the bible god does not exist.
there are many on this site that do not believe that jehovah truly exists; that he is not a real being.
but, he is as real as next breath you draw into your nostrils.. some of you say that there is no evidence that he exists.
yet, none of you can prove that he does not exits.. cofty, (you come to mind), i appreciate that you have stated, without reservation, that you do not believe that god exists.. yet, you cannot prove it.. hope in jehovah..
TWoY: "--this vast quantity of information came from an intelligence.
But you can never attribute that work to the deity or the trio featured in the bible. There might be only 2 really scientifically correct statements in all those ~ 50 000 verses that were supposed to be the word of the wt god, supposedly inspired or proofread by him.
there are many on this site that do not believe that jehovah truly exists; that he is not a real being.
but, he is as real as next breath you draw into your nostrils.. some of you say that there is no evidence that he exists.
yet, none of you can prove that he does not exits.. cofty, (you come to mind), i appreciate that you have stated, without reservation, that you do not believe that god exists.. yet, you cannot prove it.. hope in jehovah..
TODC: "--do you pray for yourself or your family?
Yes, we express gratitude for the marvellous cathedral we live, in consciousness, free knowledge and of course the food at every shared evening meal, gifts from the creator, but not necessarily the wt god.
there are many on this site that do not believe that jehovah truly exists; that he is not a real being.
but, he is as real as next breath you draw into your nostrils.. some of you say that there is no evidence that he exists.
yet, none of you can prove that he does not exits.. cofty, (you come to mind), i appreciate that you have stated, without reservation, that you do not believe that god exists.. yet, you cannot prove it.. hope in jehovah..
Jehovah, as defined by wt can not be real. ., in other words, the wt god does not exist.
wt has made him a liar, but it is supposedly impossible for god to lie. may be the creator is far bigger than the god defined by wt doctrine?
warning - long post ahead!
monday, november 28.
what we will notice is that there are three scriptural answers to this question.
sm1010: "as long as that man is a JW.
and a ministerial servant by 23., and on the the way to be an "in" Lord.
warning - long post ahead!
monday, november 28.
what we will notice is that there are three scriptural answers to this question.
D "--Daughters of Jerusalem: Do not try to awaken or arouse love in me until it feels inclined.”
This quote shows the influence the posse of ladies should have in the congregation on the outworkings of JWs' lives. Even choice of mate according to wt social standing. , quote continues." why? not to marry just anyone---.
australian child abuse royal commission rejects dr monica applewhite's evidence and testimony.. [quote] dr applewhite acknowledged that her report did not identify the basis on which she had formed her opinions.657 she accepted that her report failed to identify the ‘current standards’ of other religious organisations658 or which ‘religious organisations’ she referred to in writing her report.659 dr applewhite told the royal commission that her understanding of material provided to parents and families about sexual development in children by other faith-based organisations was ‘anecdotal’.660.
dr applewhite accepted that it would be difficult for the royal commission to accept the opinions expressed in paragraphs 36, 45, and 46 of her report because her report did not identify the basis on which those opinions were formed.661.
we do not consider that dr applewhite’s report and the opinions expressed therein assist the royal commission in its inquiry for the following reasons:.
The commission agreed, Applewhite's presentation was white wash, washed out.
