88JM

Joined

• started 33 topics
• posted 861 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by 88JM

• 
  74

  They continue to drop like flies

  by suavojr in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  yes, the jws continue to bleed their young ones, so far in my local kh 3 were dfd, one girl just turned 18 this month and packed her bags and said goodbye to the cult and her cultish parents, another young 18 year old man decided to have a non-jw girlfriend and decided to stop attending and is no longer a witness.

  they continue to leave and wt leaders dont give a damn.

  they dont do anything to help kids be successful and live a healthy life.. .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  88JM

  I wish I had been that brave at their age.
• 
  6

  Women Bishops in the UK.

  by quellycatface in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  just wondered what your thoughts were on this development in the church of england?.

  i'm all for it.

  girl power!!!

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  88JM

  The Archbishop did give an interesting quote for JW's which caught my attention. On the subject of those who may not agree with the Church's new position he said:

  "But I also rejoice that we are promising to seek the flourishing in the church of all those who disagree. If I did not think that was likely, I could not support this legislation. You don’t chuck out family, or even make it difficult for them to be at home: you love them and seek their wellbeing, even when you disagree."

  Transcript: http://www.anglicanink.com/article/women-bishops-adventure-faith-and-hope-welby-tells-synod
• 
  11

  Does the Watchtower Society Governing Body Carry Arms?

  by Scott77 in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  "...personally, i fully understand why members of the governing body travel with escorts.

  occasionally, ones carrying licensed firearms..." focus does the watchtower society governing body carry arms?

  how about jehovah's witnesses?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  88JM

  I don't think Antony Morris has much room for an uzi in those tight pants...
• 
  59

  BBC Radio 4 reference to 607 Babylonian conquest?

  by 88JM in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  was listening to bbc radio 4 late sunday night, and in a programme about migration, they referenced the "babylonian conquest of jerusalem in 607 b.c.

  " which caught my attention.. did they not mean 587 b.c., or did i understand it wrong?.

  the link to the programme is below - sorry if you're not in the u.k. as you probably won't be able to listen to bbc programmes.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  88JM

  They might not feel it's important enough to warrant a slot in the feedback programme, though that doesn't mean you won't get a response. If they are going to do a piece on the issue, they probably want to research it more and give an explanation why the error was made.

  This weeks Feedback was mostly about people talking when eating on the radio
• 
  59

  BBC Radio 4 reference to 607 Babylonian conquest?

  by 88JM in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  was listening to bbc radio 4 late sunday night, and in a programme about migration, they referenced the "babylonian conquest of jerusalem in 607 b.c.

  " which caught my attention.. did they not mean 587 b.c., or did i understand it wrong?.

  the link to the programme is below - sorry if you're not in the u.k. as you probably won't be able to listen to bbc programmes.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  88JM

  besty - probably half of those references are on here and other exJW sites! 587 is so widely accepted, it's hardly ever contested.

  Island Man - it's difficult to see how they can justify saying 607 in the context they did. They were talking about the events that Psalm 137 references, i.e. exile. I don't think anyone could reasonably say there was any kind of "conquest" or "exile" in 607 B.C. from Jerusalem surely?

  EDIT: Never mind Island Man!
• 
  59

  BBC Radio 4 reference to 607 Babylonian conquest?

  by 88JM in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  was listening to bbc radio 4 late sunday night, and in a programme about migration, they referenced the "babylonian conquest of jerusalem in 607 b.c.

  " which caught my attention.. did they not mean 587 b.c., or did i understand it wrong?.

  the link to the programme is below - sorry if you're not in the u.k. as you probably won't be able to listen to bbc programmes.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  88JM

  Also now on Youtube:

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lHaU40YHKJc
• 
  59

  BBC Radio 4 reference to 607 Babylonian conquest?

  by 88JM in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  was listening to bbc radio 4 late sunday night, and in a programme about migration, they referenced the "babylonian conquest of jerusalem in 607 b.c.

  " which caught my attention.. did they not mean 587 b.c., or did i understand it wrong?.

  the link to the programme is below - sorry if you're not in the u.k. as you probably won't be able to listen to bbc programmes.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  88JM

  Haha oh dear what have I done

  Searcher - you could also put the audio as an audio track to a blank video file and upload it to youtube which can be viewed here. I'll have a go at that myself maybe...
• 
  59

  BBC Radio 4 reference to 607 Babylonian conquest?

  by 88JM in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  was listening to bbc radio 4 late sunday night, and in a programme about migration, they referenced the "babylonian conquest of jerusalem in 607 b.c.

  " which caught my attention.. did they not mean 587 b.c., or did i understand it wrong?.

  the link to the programme is below - sorry if you're not in the u.k. as you probably won't be able to listen to bbc programmes.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  88JM

  Oh good - I'm glad to know it's not just me then!

  That's what I thought Londo.

  BBC Radio 4 feeback is indeed probably the best place to write to. The "Feedback" programme is on Fridays at 16:30 I think, and repeated on Sunday nights as well I believe.
• 
  59

  BBC Radio 4 reference to 607 Babylonian conquest?

  by 88JM in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  was listening to bbc radio 4 late sunday night, and in a programme about migration, they referenced the "babylonian conquest of jerusalem in 607 b.c.

  " which caught my attention.. did they not mean 587 b.c., or did i understand it wrong?.

  the link to the programme is below - sorry if you're not in the u.k. as you probably won't be able to listen to bbc programmes.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  88JM

  Was listening to BBC Radio 4 late Sunday night, and in a programme about migration, they referenced the "Babylonian conquest of Jerusalem in 607 B.C." which caught my attention.

  Did they not mean 587 B.C., or did I understand it wrong?

  The link to the programme is below - sorry if you're not in the U.K. as you probably won't be able to listen to BBC programmes. The reference to "607 B.C." is about 21 minutes 20 seconds on, so if you listen from about 21 minutes onwards you will hear it:

  http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b048j435

  I thought it was only JWs that think Jerusalem fell in 607 B.C.?
• 
  21

  WT Study, Sunday 6th July 2014.

  by skin in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  it might be the way i think and see, but the first time i looked at the image on pg 27 of the april 15th watchtower i was trying to figure out how it applied to this study.

  this is a darkened black and white image that appears in my edition of this magazine, (its colour online).

  anyway, para 9 talks about a brother that had an issue with looking at online porn.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  88JM

  Why does the WTS always talk about men and boys masturbating; no masturbating sisters? No sisters viewing porn?

  Can you imagine how elders would go about counselling a sister for that? If a sister ever did do the crazy thing of actually telling the elders about it, I would love to see how that conversation would go!