biblexaminer
There was indeed a governing body in the first century.
____________________________________________
Let's take the Bible we have --and just for the sake of argument-- stipulate it says what it means. ( I don't personally think the latest scholarship verifies such a stipulation, but there are too many side roads to tempt us into an eternal loop.)
If Jesus' death did indeed bridge the gap between man and God, what need have any of us for a "Governing Body"?
We have the Bible. We have God's Holy Spirit. We have prayer.
We can have fellowship (where two or more are gathered in my name. . . ) but we ALREADY have leadership: King Jesus.
In fact, when the universal Christian Church (Catholic) fell in the 16th century, (human Magisterium and tradition, bound Heaven to its rule) it was because it governed-- and by means of said governance, did so corruptly.
A pause in Governance ensued.
The Protestant Reformation was a scrambling around among the intelligentsia eager to lay down Governing rules and principles. (Out of the Catholic frying pan into the Protestant fire.)
The result was, among other denominational manifestations, the Thirty Years War.
Sola Scriptura has given us--not unity under a governing body--but dissonance and 40-thousand denominations as variations on a theme.
What would a "restored" Governing Body give us that the Advent of Christ and the resurrection of kings and judges at his side- not give us?
Show me the necessity of a GB and we have a platform for discussion.
The obsession to go back to the 1st century and duplicate primitive Christianity makes about as much sense as deciding to drive Model T Fords rather than modern automobiles.
It is some sort of Luddite compulsion isn't it?
Why isn't Jesus enough of a governing body? He is the only Mediator between God and man. Only seems to mean. . . .well. . . nobody else.