TerryWalstrom

Joined

• started 313 topics
• posted 1,550 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by TerryWalstrom

• 
  22

  Considering God's 'failure'

  by TerryWalstrom in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  jehovah's "failure".

  we humans never seem to consider god in terms of anything but power and ability.

  the idea of 'failure' is preposterous.. .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  TerryWalstrom

  All clearly prudent thoughts. Almost inescapable is the conclusion that it takes a great deal of effort to make a stone float upward like a balloon.
  
  
• 
  22

  Considering God's 'failure'

  by TerryWalstrom in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  jehovah's "failure".

  we humans never seem to consider god in terms of anything but power and ability.

  the idea of 'failure' is preposterous.. .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  TerryWalstrom

  
  As an addendum to the above mention of Just So stories*
  
  Rudyard Kipling's Just So Stories each tell how a particular animal was modified from an original form to its current form by the acts of man, or some magical being. For example, the Whale has a tiny throat because he swallowed a mariner, who tied a raft inside to block the whale from swallowing other men. The Camel has a hump given to him by a djinn as punishment for the camel's refusing to work (the hump allows the camel to work longer between times of eating). The Leopard's spots were painted by an Ethiopian (after the Ethiopian painted himself black). The Kangaroo gets its powerful hind legs, long tail, and hopping gait after being chased all day by a dingo, sent by a minor god responding to the Kangaroo's request to be made different from all other animals.
• 
  22

  Considering God's 'failure'

  by TerryWalstrom in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  jehovah's "failure".

  we humans never seem to consider god in terms of anything but power and ability.

  the idea of 'failure' is preposterous.. .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  TerryWalstrom

  Jehovah's "Failure"

  _________

  
  

  We humans never seem to consider God in terms of anything but Power and Ability. The idea of 'failure' is preposterous.

  Or, is it?

  If we take our notions of Jehovah in terms of PURPOSE, even the most devout pilgrim must acknowledge --at least for now--such PURPOSE has not come to pass.

  
  

  "Oh, but it will!"

  Okay, if you say it enough times. Sure.

  
  

  The Apostles and disciples ended their fervent prayers with, "Come quickly, Lord Jesus."

  And we're still waiting.

  
  

  JW's who jury-rigged Jesus' 'arrival' back in 1914 are forced to split such an invisible notion into two halves! Their Jesus has been busy all these years GUIDING the Governing Body in circles.

  Such a great guide! What a marvellous plan. Hooray.

  
  

  Be that as it may...

  I would reduce the problem of J-God's failures into one compound thought and I'll share it with you for your autopsy.

  Here it is:

  
  

  J-God's failure stems from having created INFERIOR creatures (making them less than divine) and holding them to perfect standards. Humans are inferior to Angels. Angels are inferior to God. (We'll side-step the whole Michael/the Word/Trinity argument).

  Holding a legless person to height standards is unthinkable. How does Jehovah differ? Not at all.

  JW theology builds an argument forever crumbling under poor design.

  
  

  Concocting a Legal Contract with Israel and attaching a malediction to failure to uphold a perfect law guaranteed centuries of persecution and hounding. The Jews (like Jehovah's Witnesses) buy-in to a special relationship and status and end up ruinously disappointed--all the while--covering up for it. (Not admitting God's failure.)

  
  

  The Apostle Paul (more or less the founder of Christianity as a theological reasoning process) lamented he was torn between what he wished to do and what his human nature demanded instead.

  It's like a stone wishing to float like a balloon!

  
  

  Conflict of nature is a very silly notion and I'll tell you why.

  
  

  IF...(I say "IF") we are designed and manufactured by a Divine being such as Jehovah, then we can't escape His design flaws.

  Dogs chase cars. It is their nature. Sure, you can punish the dog--but why not create him differently? (If you're God, of course.)

  
  

  The scenario mainstream Christianity suggests consists of DYING and being re-engineered into something ELSE entirely.

  Doesn't that REALLY mean--"Oops, let me start over and try again with these humans and angels and the whole damned architecture?"

  Well, it does to me!

  Christianity is a 'back-to-the-drawing-board situation contrived to look like a DIVINE PLAN of the ages.

  
  

  God's failure (I repeat) stems solely from creating creatures INFERIOR to Himself and demanding they adhere to a SUPERIOR standard wholly against the very nature He imposed.

  
  

  The Ad Hoc explanation of the serpent, Garden, Sin is no better than a Rudyard Kipling "Just So" story.

  God manufactured a chair. The first time anybody sat in it--it crumbled. Let's blame the sitter?

  Bah, Humbug.

  Build a better chair and it won't crumble!

  
  

  VICTIMS BLAME THEMSELVES!

  Accepting some built-in 'sin' from ancestors is a 'blame-yourself' victim argument.

  Surely we can't blame God?

  
  

  GOD FAILED and took humanity down with His error.

  JESUS FAILED and there are forty thousand denominations eager to make slightly different arguments as to why it only appears to be failure IF you come to their church and believe their proprietary nonsense.

  Whichever "God" humans think up--they still die hoping that self-same deity has been appeased by ritual and virtuous hijinks.

  
  

  Notice, if you will, this is not an Atheist argument at all.

  I'm granting an implied "swallow the gnat with the camel" presupposition.

  I just toss this out as an observation on my part.

  It isn't clever. It isn't argumentative.

  
  

  Think of me as just a man looking at a gorgeous old building with collapsed walls while reading a plaque which says, "The most perfect structure by the finest architect which endures forever."

  
  

  What is APOLOGIA?

  It consists of talking people out of plain sense by contrived arguments.

  It's considered an act of Faith.

  
  

  Been there. Done that. Thanks, but No Thanks.

  
  

  
  

  
  

  Have your say ...

  
  

  
  

  
  

  
  

  
  
• 
  11

  Encounter with C.I.A. Military Dude

  by TerryWalstrom in

  1. jw
  2. experiences

  encounter with c.i.a.

  military dudewhat follows is my conversation with a well-muscled dude in a paramilitary shirt (outside on starbucks’ patio) yesterday.military dude: (pointing) “rear tire : ya got a flat, buddy.”me: “thanks.

  slow leak.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  TerryWalstrom
• 
  11

  Encounter with C.I.A. Military Dude

  by TerryWalstrom in

  1. jw
  2. experiences

  encounter with c.i.a.

  military dudewhat follows is my conversation with a well-muscled dude in a paramilitary shirt (outside on starbucks’ patio) yesterday.military dude: (pointing) “rear tire : ya got a flat, buddy.”me: “thanks.

  slow leak.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  TerryWalstrom

  Bear paws sounds better
• 
  11

  Encounter with C.I.A. Military Dude

  by TerryWalstrom in

  1. jw
  2. experiences

  encounter with c.i.a.

  military dudewhat follows is my conversation with a well-muscled dude in a paramilitary shirt (outside on starbucks’ patio) yesterday.military dude: (pointing) “rear tire : ya got a flat, buddy.”me: “thanks.

  slow leak.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  TerryWalstrom

  I have the same opinion. Anybody who begins a conversation with a total stranger by spilling the beans of something
  you've sworn never to divulge--is always slightly suspect :)
• 
  11

  Encounter with C.I.A. Military Dude

  by TerryWalstrom in

  1. jw
  2. experiences

  encounter with c.i.a.

  military dudewhat follows is my conversation with a well-muscled dude in a paramilitary shirt (outside on starbucks’ patio) yesterday.military dude: (pointing) “rear tire : ya got a flat, buddy.”me: “thanks.

  slow leak.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  TerryWalstrom

  ENCOUNTER with C.I.A. Military Dude
  
  What follows is my conversation with a well-muscled dude in a paramilitary shirt (outside on Starbucks’ patio) yesterday.
  
  
  Military Dude: (pointing) “Rear tire : ya got a flat, Buddy.”
  
  Me: “Thanks. Slow leak. I have a hand pump.”
  
  Military Dude: (Eyeballing the pocket knife clipped to my pants) :
  “That your EDC?” (Every Day Carry)
  
  Me: (Removing it and handing it over to him) “Here ya go.”
  ______
  Okay, so this is a “guy thing” and it led to a “You show me yours and I’ll show you mine” situation. (Only: not THAT kind you dirty-minded galoots.)
  
  This burly, stereotypical man-bot began divesting himself of an awe-inspiring arsenal of “defensive” weapons while I watched slack-jawed.
  
  He introduced himself.
  His name is Rothwell, but I momentarily thought he said “Roswell” and I glanced at his ear tips to check for Vulcan status.
  Eventually, he said his name was Weldon, but he went by the nickname: CRUNCH.
  
  Crunch Rothwell: “Glock 9”
  
  He had lifted his untucked shirt revealing the automatic weapon tucked into his waistband in front, pointing muzzle down at his poppycock.
  
  I winced inwardly.
  
  Crunch recited a litany of descriptions of the various hardware and began telling me how he’d been a Navy Seal and had worked on contract with the C.I.A.
  
  “I can’t talk about that...” he said --as he began talking about it.
  
  Every few sentences, he’d begin by saying, “The Good Lord gave us brains so’s we’d have the good sense to... “
  (Fill in the blank with cautionary advice about taking proper measures by purchasing expensive defensive gear.)
  Finally, he tossed it back to me with a half-smile, “What other gear ya got on you?”
  I reached into my various pockets and came up with a packet of rancid cashews.
  
  Me: “These are to protect me from deadly indigenous wildlife attacks.”
  
  His eyes got wide.
  
  Crunch: “Like...wha-a-a-t?”
  
  Me: “Aviary predators with scathingly brilliant tactical incursion techniques.”
  
  Crunch: “Um--I don’t follow you.”
  
  Me: “I can’t talk about that.” (I would be embarrassed to tell him about Edgar the Crow.)
  
  

  He stared at me a few seconds. Probably he was deciding whether or not I was insane or just mocking him.
  
  We sat in silence.
  Finally, I got up and excused myself. He nodded. As I placed my hand on the door pull, I stopped, half-turned and offered my own version of cautionary advice.
  
  “Say, Crunch--the Good Lord gave us brains so’s we’d tuck our Glock 9 in our rear pant waistband. You see, He in His infinite wisdom knows a pistol can sometimes discharge accidentally. Consequently, He hath provided a groove between our buttcheeks to prevent the bullet from injuring our corruptible flesh.”
  
  I flashed my most friendly smile and disappeared inside.
  
  Sure enough, I peeked through the glass as Crunch Rothwell transferred his Glock 9 to his rear waistband.
  
  I always say, “Pay it forward. One day you save your own ass and the next somebody else’s.”
  
  ________
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
• 
  7

  The punchline is tuna

  by TerryWalstrom in

  1. jw
  2. experiences

  the punchline is "tuna".

  (excerpt from my autobiography, a funny thing happened on my way to armageddon).

  esther had very long, bright red hair like a disney character and she might have been almost attractive--if it weren't for two things.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  TerryWalstrom

  I've been thinking about Esther and her daughter Vicki for the last 24 hours and curiosity has gotten the better of me. I am making inquiries.
  If I find out I will post the update.
• 
  17

  Man on the High Castle

  by Gorbatchov in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  g. was binge watching on amazon prime the serie the man on the high castle.

  because my interest in history subjects a good choice!

  what i mentioned was the family of john smith, the obergruppenfuhrer.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  TerryWalstrom

  Man in the High Castle is one of the most compelling series I have EVER watched!
  The production values are off the charts; acting, photography, and music never less than top form.
  
  I'm very happy another Season has been approved.
  
  I would say--if you're only thinking about watch--sit down for at least the first 2 episodes.
  That will do it--you'll be hooked as I am.
  
  There is the world we live in and the world that we might have lived in if other choices were made we are all haunted by and the idea of merging these is fascinating.
• 
  7

  The punchline is tuna

  by TerryWalstrom in

  1. jw
  2. experiences

  the punchline is "tuna".

  (excerpt from my autobiography, a funny thing happened on my way to armageddon).

  esther had very long, bright red hair like a disney character and she might have been almost attractive--if it weren't for two things.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  TerryWalstrom

  Not that it matters in the least--but, I finally remembered her daughter's name. It was Vicky.
  
  Vicky was a "Princess". As I recall, she let her hair grow so long it was all the way down to the Australian Outback. Sort of another reason to grab attention as I reckoned it.
  
  When I departed Texas for California, I left all those Dubby "friends" to languish in the past.
  So I wonder what happened to them?
  Mostly they died off like some endangered species.
  
  They'd never grow old in this "Old System of things".
  How important we all felt back then...to be the very ones who'd see the Old pass away and the New World Order commence.
  
  This morning when I woke up I must have had some burp of memory spill over into my dream and Esther, Sister Esther was there again.
  
  My fellow JW, Johnny, and I used to make jokes about Sister Esther.
  
  Q: Why is Esther flat-chested?
  A: Not enough Esther Chin
  
  (Insert laugh)