Smoke soon followed. As though Satan had spoken.
**
the first 4 chapters are done on the james bond novel i began writing yesterday.
i'm having to much fun with it to stop now.
veronica spoke the two words clearly and waited.. .
let's put first things first.
ask the average bible reader to name the prophets.
easy peasy!.
Let's put First things First
Ask the average Bible reader to name the prophets. Easy peasy!
The major prophets of the Hebrew Bible were:
Joshua
Samuel
Isaiah
Jeremiah
Ezekiel
Hosea or Hoshea
Joel or Yo'el
Amos
Obadiah or Ovadyah
Jonah or Yonah
Micah or Mikhah
Nahum or Nachum
Habakkuk or Habacuc
Zephaniah or Tsefania
Haggai or Haggai
Zechariah Zekharia
Malachi or Malakhi
_____________
So far so good?
The TALMUD says that there had been twice as many prophets as the number of people who left Egypt (2,600,000), but only those whose messages were for future generations were recorded. This count was 48 male and 7 female Prophets.
What do you make of that fact?
HOW WE DEFINE the word PROPHET?
1. a person (of either sex) who claims contact with the supernatural/divine and who purports to SPEAK FOR THEM
2. human serving as an intermediator between the divine and humanity
3. human entrusted to bestow special knowledge from a divine source
What makes a prophet a PROPHET?
Is that clear enough? When such a person (list above) speaks or writes a message....it is called PROPHECY.Jews, Christians and Muslims have a matter-of-fact attitude about prophets and prophecy--BECAUSE they are monotheists.
However, their view is historically VERY NARROW!
In every civilization regardless of religion there are such prophets who have operated all through history!
List of Facts about Prophets:
1. Targets of persecution and opposition by authorities in power whom the prophets had criticized
2. Gave specific warnings about corruption and malfeasance in order to correct wrongful practices
3. Called "seers" because prophets could see what authority was doing wrong and reporting it publicly
4. Tertullian and Eusebius report the activity of prophets operating long after the death of the twelve original Apostles
_______
Are you still with me?
Can a religious body, group or organization do the work a prophet is said to do and correctly claim to NOT be a prophet?
What if there was an organization that wanted all the respect, gravitas and authority possessed by a prophet of God while
exempting itself from charges of FALSE PROPHET when its utterances failed? Would this group be guilty of trickery and blame-shifting?
______________________
King James Version (KJV)
21 And if thou say in thine heart, How shall we know the word which the Lord hath not spoken?
22 When a prophet speaketh in the name of the Lord, if the thing follows not, nor come to pass, that is the thing which the Lord hath not spoken, but the prophet hath spoken it presumptuously: thou shalt not be afraid of him.
The Governing Body of Jehovah's Witnesses claims special privilege as:
"The mouthpiece of God."
This matches #1 on our list of definitions of PROPHET .....Check!
****
The Watchtower magazine has repeatedly emphasized the status of its Governing Body as intermediary charged with the duty of
providing all the True teachings of Jehovah while demanding loyalty from obedient Christians.
This matches #2 on our list of definitions of PROPHET......check!
***
Throughout its history, Jehovah's Witnesses have received New Light, it claims, as special discrete knowledge of dates for Armageddon.
This matches #3 on our list of definitions of PROPHET.....check!
Do Jehovah's leaders make the claim for themselves?
YES!
Watchtower 1972 Apr 1 pp.197-199
'They Shall Know that a Prophet Was Among Them'
Watchtower described itself as "the modern-day "prophet"
"So, does Jehovah have a prophet to help them, to warn them of dangers and to declare things to come?
IDENTIFYING THE "PROPHET"
These questions can be answered in the affirmative. Who is this prophet? ... This "prophet" was not one man, but was a body of men and women. It was the small group of footstep followers of Jesus Christ, known at that time as International Bible Students. Today they are known as Jehovah's Christian witnesses. ... Of course, it is easy to say that this group acts as a "prophet" of God. It is another thing to prove it. The only way that this can be done is to review the record. Thus this group of anointed followers of Jesus Christ, doing work in Christendom paralleling Ezekiel's work among the Jews, were manifestly the modern-day Ezekiel, the "prophet" commissioned by Jehovah to declare the good news of God's Messianic kingdom and to give warning to Christendom."
______
Have they discovered a loophole for lying in the name of Jehovah and getting away with it?
Why YES! Through the cowardly trick of putting quotation marks "-----" around the word prophet! "Prophet".
Quotation Marks Can Communicate Sarcasm and Irony
One of the greatest virtues of quotation marks in our language is that they can become the body language and facial expressions of the written word. They can make any word sarcastic or ironic, like in this sentence:
Your freshly made “bread” kept my bowels churning all night.
"The quotation marks will suggest to some people that you are using that word in a special or peculiar way and that you really mean something else..."
YES THE GOVERNING BODY THINKS THEY CAN HAVE IT BOTH WAYS!
Claiming to be and denying all at the same time!
"Ever since The Watchtower began to be published in July 1879 it has looked ahead into the future... No, The Watchtower is no inspired prophet, but it follows and explains a Book of prophecy the predictions in which have proved to be unerring and unfailing till now. The Watchtower is therefore under safe guidance. It may be read with confidence, for its statements may be checked against that prophetic Book."
(The Watchtower 1 January 1969)
Indeed, 7 million members of this religion ALLOW THEM to escape condemnation for false prophecy and give them unwavering personal loyalty.
Is there no modern-day group of prophets who will STAND UP AND ACCUSE THIS RELIGION?
The answer is: YES! There exists a modern day prophet to point an accusing finger at this Governing Body in protest!
Who is this PROPHET? WE ARE!
The community of ex-JW members who publicly voice their accusations of lying, false prophesying, lethal blood policies, and child molestation malfeasance!
WE SO-CALLED APOSTATES are the REAL PROPHETS!
I remind you:
List of Facts about Prophets
1. Targets of persecution and opposition by authorities in power whom the prophets had criticized
2. Gave specific warnings about corruption and malfeasance in order to correct wrongful practices
We can laugh at this Twist Ending!
james ussher (1581-1656).
your name is ussher – james ussher – and you are the archbishop of all of ireland.. you are living in the 1600s and are obsessive-compulsive when it comes to speculative ideas.
you are convinced that you alone have the intellect to figure exact dates of all the major events in the bible actually.
Yes, there are still faithful followers of Charles Taze Russell around. Amazing isn't it?
This blog examines the Russellites as they, in turn, examine Jehovah's Witnesses.
wasn't it isaac newton that calculated the date that the end would be?
it was like 2062 i think.
anyways why doesnt the gb adopt isaac newton say the end is coming in 2062 and then if it fails to come blame it on him?
A long time ago Atlantis posted an interesting snippet on a previous Newton thread:
In the book published in 1993 by the Watchtower Society called, "Jehovah's Witnesses Proclaimers of God's Kingdom," states in the footnote on page 46 the following: "Neither Barbour nor Russell was first to explain the Lord's return as an invisible presence. Much earlier, Sir Isaac Newton (1642-1727) had written that Christ would return and reign "invisible to mortals." In 1856, Joseph Seiss, a Lutheran minister in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, had written about a two-stage second advent----an invisible "parousia", or presence, followed by a visible manifestation. Then, in 1864, Benjamin Wilson had published his "Emphatic Diaglott with the interlinear reading "presence." not "coming," for parousia, and B. W. Keith, an associate of Barbour, had drawn it to the attention of Barbour and his associates.
Apocalypse soon?
Newton predicts end of world for 2060
Sir Isaac Newton attained scientific immortality for formulating the law of gravity, but he was also a theologian who wrote more than one million words on biblical subjects and was influenced by Hebrew scripture, according to academic articles on his work. He studied the Bible for more than 50 years, trying to unravel what he believed were God's secret laws of the universe.Six years after his death, a book by the scientist abouteschatology (the end of the world, in this case as revealed by the Bible) was published, On the Prophecies of Daniel and the Apocalypse of Saint John.
However, most of his notes on the theme remained unknown, but in recent years a document has been found in a Newton collection in the Jewish National Library in Jerusalem that shows he set 2060 as the year the world would expire. The Newton Project, and in particular the academic, Stephen Snobelen, have been working on Newton’s documents and have revealed that Newton concluded that Armageddon – a last great battle, would occur in 2060, with plagues, the return of Christ, and the end of time. Newtone wrote that this apocalypsewould be followed by a 1,000-year reign by the saints on Earth.
Newton stated:
This I mention not to assert when the time of the end shall be, but to put a stop to the rash conjectures of fancifull men who are frequently predicting the time of the end, and by doing so bring the sacred prophesies into discredit as often as their predictions fail.
"(It) is very counter-intuitive for people to think of Newton in terms of date setting and working in prophecy," Stephen Snobelen told Bible Network News. "Because there's this conception that science doesn't have anything to do with religion, and that's a very unfortunate conception," he added. "You can find all sorts of examples to disprove that. Historically and also today, most scientists have some sort of religious background or sentiment."
Snobelen explained to Bible Network News how Newton devised his calculation. "In the book of Daniel you will find the time period 1260 days. And it appears there as 'a time, times, and a half', and that means a year, two years, and a half a year. In other words, 1260 days or 42 months. Newton interpreted the days as years, so that gave him 1260 years. The 1260 date (also) does appear in the Book of Revelation." These Biblical references can be found in Daniel 12:7, Revelation 11:3, 12:6 and 13:5.
The Newton Project is working towards the publication, for the first time, of all Newton’s theological and alchemical works, stating “There are excellent editions of his mathematical and scientific papers, as well as of his correspondence, but very few of his non-scientific writings have ever appeared in print. The Newton Project will place these writings in their relevant contexts, which will be made accessible by means of hyperlinks.”
james ussher (1581-1656).
your name is ussher – james ussher – and you are the archbishop of all of ireland.. you are living in the 1600s and are obsessive-compulsive when it comes to speculative ideas.
you are convinced that you alone have the intellect to figure exact dates of all the major events in the bible actually.
WILLIAM MILLER!
______
Time: 1782 (After the American Revolution and before the War of 1812)
Place: Pittsfield, Massachusetts.
There is a family of 16 children called the Miller family.
The firstborn male in that family was named William. He was born into a family of abject poverty. Little wonder with all those children, you say? Not exactly. Poor families needed to have lots of children to survive by working those kids' fingers to the bone to benefit the household as best as they could. The Miller family was no exception. William had little opportunity to better himself in the normal scheme of things other than a rudimentary education. But, he was special.
William Miller was a very curious and bright lad who loved reading books! He devoured them whenever he had a spare moment away from his backbreaking chores. He learned as much as he could and became useful in his teen years to the community in which he lived, Low Hampton New York. He became the local scribe. Community scribe was necessary at a time when a great many folks had been too busy at hard work to learn how to read or write. Having a secretary with these skills was indispensable.
William's parents made a strong impression on his character. William's dad had been an army captain in the American Revolutionary War. His mother was deeply pious and a devout Baptist. His Grandfather and two uncles were Baptist Church ministers. Can you imagine the questions a bright young man would have at family gatherings? In a "children should be seen and not heard" sort of world; how would this be tolerated?
When he turned 21, Miller married a woman who had a profound influence on his thinking and his belief system. He married Lucy Smith and moved away from his family ties to Vermont in the town of Poultney.
As is often the case, once a young person leaves the familiar behind them and starts a new life on their own they are more objective and idealistic than before. Newly married William Miller saw things he couldn't like or understand in the hypocrisy of local Christians. He asked many questions and could not abide the answers he was given by local ministers. His giant intellect vomited out mundane explanations and he turned inward.
His easy faith had now been damaged. He questioned everything. He formed a circle of new friends who were not insular Baptists as before. His friends included educated, articulate and refined people who read the works and words of great thinkers such as Voltaire, Paine, and Hume. Miller was irresistibly drawn to "rationalist" thinking and philosophy. He transformed from a humble believer to rational Deist. Whatever/whomever "God" was had created the universe and wiped His hands of it leaving mankind to fend for itself outside the rules of a mere book such as the Holy Bible. Mind you, he was not an atheist. He was seeing God as impersonal and distant to human affairs.
While Miller's profession of faith changed, his outlook on what was ethical and moral was firmly entrenched. He was no libertine indulging the flesh. He remained steadfast and upright in his actions and a leader in the local community well-respected for integrity. Miler served as constable, Justice of the Peace and even sheriff.
By the age of 30, Miller faced the War of 1812 as the Captain of the local regiment of infantry. He met the challenge of the British by facing off with his men at the Battle of Plattsburg.
Battles at that time were largely a matter of two things: how many soldiers there were handy to fight and how much advantage in terrain and experience were available. Miller's infantry was grossly outnumbered 3 to 1 and faced certain defeat. Miller was smart enough to know this. It was unthinkable they should win at such odds against seasoned troops such as the British brought to bear upon them.
Then, events transpired which dramatically seized upon Miller's sense of the divine. The Americans won and the British retreated!! The main cause was the defeat of the British Navy which was the support of infantry columns. The British lived to fight another day by not squandering troops. But, Miller saw it as proof positive that God was truly one who intervened in human history. Perhaps even intervening meant God had a purpose for Miller's life personally.
It was a new William Miller born that day by unexpected events and an imagination fueled by his early belief-system.
Let us stop for a moment and reflect!
William Miller is now a war hero, a natural leader of me, well-respected for his integrity and much appreciated for his intelligence and curiosity. In a world of deeply religious believers, many of whom came from Puritan families, such a man as Miller might seem remarkably blessed against a backdrop of this Epiphany of Belief!
After the war, Miller moved his family back to Low Hampton and began life as a mere farmer. But, deeply troubled in his mind and soul he tried to reconcile his personal experiences with his religious upbringing. He sought solace in attending his Uncle's Baptist church.
Obviously, his family deeply longed to have William join them spiritually without reservation. His Uncle involved Miller in Bible reading before the congregation. The loving support of the crowds and their natural admiration keened him toward a tipping point of inevitable crisis.
According to William Miller's own account, it was in the public reading of Isaiah 53 that it all came together. The focus of this scripture was expounded to explain what Miller had failed to see. God did purposefully intervene in men's affairs to redound to their salvation!! Miller was stricken at his failure to see this previously. He collapsed with emotion only to rise afterward with dramatic self-realization.
Miller's journey was a small circle back to the starting point. He simply became what he had been raised to be all along: a devout Christian Believer. But, now; the full force of his intellect was brought to bear upon it rather than the weak and ineffective emotional succor he saw in others.
What William Miller now threw himself into is predictable in hindsight. He simply did what he always did: he began reading and teaching himself from whatever books were available. Miller was what is called an auto-didact; a self-taught man. Whatever views he might form would be according to his own personality, whims, and imagination rather than conforming to some rigor of schooling or headmaster's influence.
William Miller invented himself and the indelible mark of his theology would be proprietary to his self-educated viewpoint. It is notable that what William Miller sought to do is done again and again every day by perplexed Christians and waffling non-believers alike. It is commonplace and rather naive to simply view it now for what it was.
1. Miller started with the first book of the bible and worked his way through to the end using a concordance only so as not to taint his learning by the opinion of others.
2. Miller tackled the problem of language and interpretation and lack of resources with zeal. Yet, he was baffled by most of the difficult passages. There was little in the way of archeology, hermeneutics, documentary hypothesis or analysis of any scientific structure available at that time. But, he slogged away for 2 solid years!
3. Miller concentrated on what interested him most: Prophecy and especially End Times. This was of the greatest interest to amateurs as always because it concerned them personally and the times in which he lived.
What happens next is most interesting. Miller finished his studies in 1818 at the age of 36. He had bootstrapped himself into a theory about End Times that gave him much cause for urgency. Miller came up with the idea that ONLY TWENTY-FIVE YEARS REMAINED before Jesus would return to Earth and end human affairs!!
The target year was 1843!
Let us stop once again and review.
Plenty of crackpots through history had come up with speculative dates and explanations for when the world would end. They came and the went. What made Miller's crackpot speculations different, you might ask?
Nothing. It was William Miller as a person that is of interest.
It would not exactly be the scholarship or explanation of William Miller that would set events into motion which should concern us here. It is the fact that Miller had credibility, respect, good standing in the community, intellect, high morals, and a strong connection with fellow Christians that should red flag what followed. Miller had strayed from the faith and had COME BACK as a prodigal son which marked him as no flash in the pan. Miller had been a war hero with a story of Divine Intervention on his behalf that made him irresistible to other believers and even non-believers who might sympathize.
Miller had Gravitas! He was one heavy dude. Further, he had natural talent as an orator and preacher of spellbinding ability. He made people listen and he could convince you that pigs could fly so marvelous was his gift of speech.
The disaster that followed was caused by people admiring the talent of other people and wanting a certain outcome in advance to be true! All it took was the suspension of disbelief. Miller gave it to them in spades.
Two things of note now follow.
1. Miller did something that no other preacher had done. Miller propounded the idea that ANY student of the bible of normal intelligence could do what he, Miller, had done without being a graduate of a Theological Seminary. Miller became the first POPULIST preacher of note to move a vast crowd. He empowered the little people rather than making them feel stupid and passive.
2. Miller challenged Authority! It would not be the Church as an institution which would bring about the Millennium Reign of Christ--no! It would be a small band of True Believers unfettered by tradition and pomposity.
3. Miller produced an easy-to-understand system which anybody could grasp immediately. The past mirrored the future. Prophecy of old was a mirror of fulfillment in present times. It was a matter of Dispensations or spans of time which matched present-day events that enabled believers to understand predictions of when the End was to come.
4. Miller produced 14 or 15 iron-clad arguments to persuade belief in his system. He used chiefly Daniel 8:14 and Daniel 9:24-27 to achieve his purpose.
Stop and think!
Jehovah's Witnesses and Seventh Day Adventists are today still using William Miller's system and explanations! As ex-JW's we are familiar with the "day for a year" and "weeks of the year" arguments and reasonings. The only changes made today are small and inconsequential ones. The system hasn't been junked at all!
I mentioned to you how smart William Miller was, right? You must know, then, that he knew he was going to be in for a hailstorm of protests, arguments, and criticisms. So, he spent an additional FIVE YEARS perfecting his counter-arguments, explanations, charts, diagrams, and reasonings anticipating every critic in advance!!
Miller's theology, like that of today's Jehovah's Witnesses, was a refutation based counter-attack strategy. For every protest there was a reply; a counter-punch that took you back to scripture. The effect was like watching a fistfight between a professional boxer and small un-trained amateur. It was always a dramatic knockout!
As people now know, Miller's arguments suffered from two fatal flaws hidden from view: wrong assumptions that bedeviled his very premises and the interpretations of meaning in scripture.
In other words, it was as computer programmer often says: GARBAGE IN = GARBAGE OUT.
However, be it noted here something very important. William Miller was an intellectually honest person. He was sincere. He was reluctant. He was not a charleton nor a flim-flam artist. Read his own words:
When I was about my business, it was continually ringing in my ears, "Go and tell the world of their danger...." I felt that if the wicked could be effectually warned, multitudes of them would repent; and that if they were not warned, their blood might be required at my hand."
This is true Christian responsibility!
Having no formal public speaking training, feeling too old, not a preacher by trade, Miller overcame his reluctance.
On the morning of Saturday, August 13,1831 the fifty-five year old farmer promised God something that would go on to change your life and mine.
Read what it was:
"If I should have an invitation to speak publicly in any place, I will go and tell them what I have found."
As he made this very vow his own nephew was racing to his side to deliver an invitation for him to preach the very next day at the Baptist church in nearby Dresden!
Preparation met opportunity and the rest is history.
The result was a vast wildfire enthusiasm unlike anything known in the New World. Audiences went crazy with acceptance and motivation. Invitations galore took him from one church to another as the crowds grew larger and yet larger into huge mobs of quivering, wide-eyed yokels filled with dread, awe and religious zeal.
Revivals broke out and thousands were throwing themselves at the altars embracing Salvation and baptism in preparation for THE END. So successful did this make the local Baptist Churches that they granted him a special license to preach as a Baptist minister in 1833.
An industry was begun with pamphlets, charts and printed sermons. Illustrators sought to depict the events of Revelation soon to unfold on mankind as these publications flooded America like nothing before it. It was crazy--man--CRAZY!!
It wasn't long before half a million people stood nodding in agreement with the rendezvous with Armageddon Miller had foretold. How could it be otherwise? Leading minsters and preachers well-respected in their community came forth with public acceptance and approval of what Miller was doing and this more than triggered the final skeptics into jumping on the bandwagon with mad abandon.
One follower and admirer, Joshua V. Himes helped Miller to publish Signs of the Times and Midnight Cry.
Both influenced sectarian copycats to come.
Millerites is what his followers were eventually called by nay-sayers. After the fact it is claimed only about 55,000 people to 100,000 were true followers of his movement and theology. But, his influence was infectious in many quarters. His methodology was popular no matter what conclusions were reached at the end.
As the dreaded date approached, these 2nd Adventist watchers-of-the-end coalesced into a sect or two of True Believers who could not accept that this might all be a non-event.
Noteworthy is the following:
1. Millerites began characterizing other churches (who did not embrace their end time speculations) as members of Babylon the Great!
2. Eventually, ALL other Christian Churches were seen has clinging to Satan's old world instead of preparing for the New World to come.
3. Christendom was attacked as the whore of Babylon who rejected the only true religion.
4. Followers began divesting themselves of personal possessions, dropping out of schools and selling their houses in preparation of the Great Day to come.
5. The unexpected appearance of a great comet in February seemed a sure sign of what was certain to follow.
THE GREAT DISAPPOINTMENT
I'm sure you can guess
!
To his merit, William Miller made a public apology:
"I confess my error, and acknowledge my disappointment." He conveyed this retraction in May of 1844.
"Yet I still believe that the day of the Lord is near, even at the door."
__________
I indirectly lay blame at the feet of this man for my 20 years wasted in the belly of the beast called Jehovah's Witnesses.
They are his progeny.
james ussher (1581-1656).
your name is ussher – james ussher – and you are the archbishop of all of ireland.. you are living in the 1600s and are obsessive-compulsive when it comes to speculative ideas.
you are convinced that you alone have the intellect to figure exact dates of all the major events in the bible actually.
The "methodology" of chronology varies little from Isaac Newton to William Miller, Charles T. Russell, et al. I think it is not an exaggeration to see it as teaching yourself brain surgery by spending hours at the local library.
You learn a lot of technical terminologies and become conversant in broad strokes--but it doesn't make you qualified to perform an operation a hapless patient would survive.
Being a Bible Chronologer is the same as Quack Doctor. People will trust you enough that you badly injure them (or kill them outright.)
William Miller is a character well worth studying. What a piece of work!
He set the stage in modern times. He got it dead wrong. However, he used his reputation and utmost sincerity to lead thousands astray.
Not on purpose!
He was wrong twice and apologized. However, it is written that he still believed he was only off by a little down to the day he died.
would i err in stating most religions and denominations have set doctrines?and yet, the watchtower's version/rendition of christianity is riven with contradictions which stem from changing predictions, policies, doctrines, and interpretations seemingly adrift from foundation or principle.wouldn't you think the constant upheaval, sifting, churn, and reorganization bespeaks whim, mood, uncertainty, and wilful speculation more than divine guidance?there's something endemically jittery and insecure about this religion which i would opine has more than a little to do with unstable mental affect than mere whimsy.what's your take on this?.
I think it is worth pointing out the obvious (just this once ) :)
When the word CHRISTIANITY is spoken or written a kind of magic trick is underway.
There is no singularity--only multiplicity--like a Multiple Personality Disorder which appears to be just one thing (person), but there is no "there" there. It is illusion.
Maybe there never was a singular Christianity!
Meaning what?
The Apostles were always at loggerheads. Paul and Peter clashed.
There are four disparate "gospels", Constantine tried to "herd cats" invoking the
325 AD assembly of ragtag and disputatious ruffians from all over the Diaspora.
All of which to say this:
Constantine put all the body parts into the stew, closed the lid and clicked "on" the pressure cooker.
The result? It doesn't taste like chicken!
For 1,500 years "Christianity" tasted out of one bowl.
When the impious monk Martin Luther broke the mirror one gazes into to see Christ--the pieces shattered into teeny bits each of us stares into (like Nietzsche's abyss)
and aren't we in for shock at what stares back? OUR OWN "Christianity".
why hadrian built a wallto m.r.g.a (make rome great again).
it was and ever will be known as hadrian's wall.. hadrian’s wall stretched across northern england, cutting britain in two.built in the 120’s a.d.. the dimensions of hadrian’s wall are staggering.hadrian’s wall was more than just a “wall”.
it was a complex of forts, lookout towers, and castles.. when new, the height of hadrian’s wall reached 20 ft. (6.096 meters).. the wall was 10 ft. thick (3.048 meters)._____background.
One gigantic realization smacked me upside my head visiting Europe for the very first time. The Divine Right of Kings (Emperors, Czars, etc.) is everywhere in evidence almost solely because of architecture.
Europe is architecture.
The outsized egos and megalomania coupled with irresistible power forced these
walls, monuments, paintings, bridges, parks, statues and such by the sheer magnitude of will.
The Evil men do lives on after them while the good is oft interred with their bones.
That is--unless they BUILT THINGS :)
I'm pretty sure Donald Trump is well aware of these things.
my name is sophie mueller, and i’m currently in the class ap research.
the aim of ap research is to have students enter into an academic conversation that exists about a specific topic or issue.
for my research project, i have chosen to evaluate the social stress levels, or sense of belonging, within members of the jehovah’s witnesses community, due to my personal background with the religion.
A member-in-good-standing inside Jehovah's Witnesses organization is certainly
not at liberty to voice any angst, stress, or criticism of any sort.
Why? There is no individuality and the fear of "bringing reproach" is horrifying.
I speak as a former member from association beginning at age 12 in 1959, baptized in 1963, imprisoned in 1967 (conscientious objector), paroled in 1969, a full-time pioneer (door to door ministry for one year and a half) and disfellowshipped in 1980.
The corollary of this is obvious, of course--a former member would hardly be a former member unless considerable stress, disappointment, heartbreak, and anger issues had brought about such a reversal.
Consequently, between the cone of silence on one end and complete antipathy on the other end--a researcher won't be able to find a middle ground to calibrate what "normal" would look like.
I wish you well, by the way
Terry Walstrom
[email protected]
would i err in stating most religions and denominations have set doctrines?and yet, the watchtower's version/rendition of christianity is riven with contradictions which stem from changing predictions, policies, doctrines, and interpretations seemingly adrift from foundation or principle.wouldn't you think the constant upheaval, sifting, churn, and reorganization bespeaks whim, mood, uncertainty, and wilful speculation more than divine guidance?there's something endemically jittery and insecure about this religion which i would opine has more than a little to do with unstable mental affect than mere whimsy.what's your take on this?.
Rank and file members look forward to "new light" as if it were a box of chocolates instead of stark proof the previous "understanding" (Ha!) was dead wrong.
The word ADJUSTMENT comes to mind this way...
If a picture of Jeebus hanging on your wall hangs a bit wonky this way or that...
You ADJUST by slightly moving it.
Jehovah's Witnesses' GB remove the picture from the wall and replace it with an
Elvis on black velvet in garish oil.