uncle_onion

Joined

• started 67 topics
• posted 250 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by uncle_onion

• 
  7

  silentlambs website

  by silentlambs in

  1. watchtower
  2. scandals

  we have added some new graphics and other adjustments to the website, you might want to check it out and see what you think.

  new information will be added in the next few days so checkin from to time to time.

  any suggestions will be considered.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  uncle_onion

  whats the address?

  UO
• 
  8

  607 or 587?

  by cocolocoii in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i found a very nice internet page where you can really learn many fact about jehovah's witnesses.. please go to yahoo and search for research on the watchtower.. i hope fred reads this site.. comments?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  uncle_onion

  POlyhistor got his info from Berrosus. the Catholic Encyclopedia says this "What has come down is in the form of fragments preserved principally by late Greek historians and writers, such as Alexander Polyhistor, Abydenus, and Apollodorus, whose writings are quoted by Josephus, Nicholas of Damascus, Julius Africanus, Eusebius, Syncellus, and a few others. So it is apparent that the views put forth by Berosus come down in a very roundabout manner. In places his statements have been so garbled as to seem absurd, and yet, fragmentary as his work is, it is of great importance. "

  Speaks for itself.

  Uo
• 
  8

  607 or 587?

  by cocolocoii in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i found a very nice internet page where you can really learn many fact about jehovah's witnesses.. please go to yahoo and search for research on the watchtower.. i hope fred reads this site.. comments?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  uncle_onion

  Interestingly "Dick" a stele was found in 1956 that was inscribed with the reigns of the kings that Adad-guppi had lived under. It states that evil Madduch reigned for two years.This is one bit of evidence and there are a lot more to back it up.What makes it even more important is that it is dated from that era and not 800 years later.

  "Dick" you dont get it do you. If you are trying to cast doubt on the validity of the Babylonian history, you are going to come into a lot of difficulty.If you are trying to say that the worlds historians have the Babylonian kingly reigns totally wrong and can proof it then I will have to agree with you.BUT we will have no choice then to throw out the date of 539 BCE as well. You can not have one without the other.

  You are also forgetting that we have an adundant amount of astronomical evidence as well, and a mass of cunieform data that also has to be thrown out if you are right.All this dates the kingly reigns and fits in with every thing that we have at the moment.

  So what reserach have you done yourself "Dick"? I am not talking about a book that you have read but what actual research.What Cunieform tablets have you actually examined your self? And how come the GB have not used this research that you have "staggered" across in their defence?

  As usual I expect a barrage of abuse from you because you are in a corner but quite frankly I am getting used to it.

  Over to you "Dick" and this time how about answering my questions which would make a nice change?

  UO
• 
  33

  The Elders' are Coming, Need Questions..!!!!

  by Casper in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  the elders are coming this saturday to do their yearly.

  shepherding .. .

  i desperatly need a couple good "questions" to throw at.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  uncle_onion

  "Dick"

  You wrote "Ask them how in the world could a person like Carol Jonnson can write something about Middle East Chronology when doesn't know anything about Semetic languages?"

  "Carol Jonnson"? Is that Carls wife or sister?

  UO
• 
  4

  Witnessaiduk??

  by JEMIMAH in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  does anyone know what has happened to the excellent site.

  witnessaiduk??

  it seems to have gone missing.. also does anyone know the latest news regarding the blackmore saga?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  uncle_onion

  Hi

  i wil find out the site address for you if you give me an e mail address.

  What do you want to know about the Balckmores? I know them personally.

  UO
• 
  33

  The Elders' are Coming, Need Questions..!!!!

  by Casper in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  the elders are coming this saturday to do their yearly.

  shepherding .. .

  i desperatly need a couple good "questions" to throw at.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  uncle_onion

  My advice is 607 BCE and the "validity" of it.Make them work to give you an answer.Have a look at my web site www.607v587.com and get reading!

  UO
• 
  20

  what brought you out?

  by uncle_onion in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i was intersted in what brought "you" out.. with me it was the 607 bce thing.

  i always followed the org and would have died for it but when i saw the fallacy of the 607 date that blew it for me.

  i am now on a quest to try and find something to feel comfortable with.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  uncle_onion

  I was intersted in what brought "you" out.

  With me it was the 607 bce thing. I always followed the org and would have died for it but when I saw the fallacy of the 607 date that blew it for me. I am now on a quest to try and find something to feel comfortable with. My wife has become a Born again christian and attends church after all her life in the dubs.

  UO
• 
  23

  I am no longer a Ministerial Servant

  by cocolocoii in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  yesterday was announced that i was not longer a ministerial servant.

  to be honest i felt really good about it.

  i literally was tired of been pretending.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  uncle_onion

  I asked a Christian friend about that scripture and he wrote this:

  note the context of the parable of the several invitations. Note Mt 22:1 "in further reply ..." Mt 21:44, 45 shows Jesus ws teaching the Jewish hierarchy. The parable is intended to show that "many [Jews]" are given the invitation to share in Christ's Kingdom but are all too busy. God the King finally destroys their city in 70 AD. [22:7] But, turning to the non-Jews others are invited to become subjects of Christ's realm. Upon the parousia judgment those who invited but turn out to be like those of Mt 7:21-23 will be cast out. From the standpoint of judgment those who are "chosen" would be those positively described in 2 Cor 5:10 and 1 John 2:28. It is also possible that those "chosen" are those who accepted the invitation [or, callng - the Greek is the same] and joined fellowship within the realm of Christ. The term "chosen ones" is almost a synonym for "saints" used elsewhere.

  UO
• 
  23

  I am no longer a Ministerial Servant

  by cocolocoii in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  yesterday was announced that i was not longer a ministerial servant.

  to be honest i felt really good about it.

  i literally was tired of been pretending.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  uncle_onion

  I was am MS for about 6 years. When I had to change congs The Elders said that They were going to "see how I got on" as I missed meetings as I worked shifts as a Firefighter. So as I am still a Firefighter so I was never reappointed!

  UO
• 
  22

  COPYRIGHTS and the WTS publications

  by MacHislopp in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i was wondering about this part written in the.

  w. 15.02.2001 page 29 (box) :.

  ...related to this, christian should avoid putting onto, or downloading.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  uncle_onion

  I could not undertstand this one either. I thought that we were suppose to be the WTs (when we were pucka dubs)? I thought that we were the organisation, all of us?

  UO