to me, the similarity that is becoming the most telling, is the occurrence of death in both animal and human.
Animals die simply because its 'the circle of life'
man dies because of his 'evil' actions
recently i read some essays on animal behavorial patterns and i must say i'm shocked at how little difference (when you honestly consider it) there is between said animals and us, human beings.. this is a very new concept for me personally but here is my take on it (i'm sure its not so new, ex.
evolution) - what if humans in fact are mimicking animals, and not the other way around as we'd like to think.. displays of love and affection, clinginess, mourning etc, they all exist in the animal kingdom, but how are we so different?
a pack of wolves attack and kill a caribou for dinner and its considered nature, the same wolves hunt down a lost man in the woods and now its considered 'evil', and if there are any forest rangers around its guaranteed that they will shoot these wolves.. man's heartless treatment of man is considered 'evil', but if evolution is of any indication (in terms of survival of the fittest) is the 'term' evil just a word to appease our so called conscious?.
to me, the similarity that is becoming the most telling, is the occurrence of death in both animal and human.
Animals die simply because its 'the circle of life'
man dies because of his 'evil' actions
recently i read some essays on animal behavorial patterns and i must say i'm shocked at how little difference (when you honestly consider it) there is between said animals and us, human beings.. this is a very new concept for me personally but here is my take on it (i'm sure its not so new, ex.
evolution) - what if humans in fact are mimicking animals, and not the other way around as we'd like to think.. displays of love and affection, clinginess, mourning etc, they all exist in the animal kingdom, but how are we so different?
a pack of wolves attack and kill a caribou for dinner and its considered nature, the same wolves hunt down a lost man in the woods and now its considered 'evil', and if there are any forest rangers around its guaranteed that they will shoot these wolves.. man's heartless treatment of man is considered 'evil', but if evolution is of any indication (in terms of survival of the fittest) is the 'term' evil just a word to appease our so called conscious?.
good points servant and jgnat,
and again, the animal kingdom is replete of examples where 'good' actions take place - animals can show affection, 'love', care and compassion, mourning. animals will defend their own with tooth and claw (literally), even sacrifice themselves for their young ones or the weak.
animals are also capable of feats of engineering, teamwork, productivity, communication and even language comprehension (talking to each even, ex. whales)
BUT, they also display the aforementioned 'acts of evil' because they ARE animals after all.
yet, the very same actions among humans are not 'nature', they are evil.
and so i beg the question, why is this? and are we honestly different?
making people cling to the organization more.
when i found out it was up i told so many people frantically that there is a new study article up and that it had so many changes.
my mother started crying saying how happy she is to be a part of an organization that is truly directed by jehovah... only the true faithful and discreeet slave could have such insight.... another person began to say how great it is to see the celestial chariot on the move.. .
wtwizard wrote-
Truth is, Satan is nothing like what the xian crap teaches (let alone the washtowel). Satan is the one that wanted us free, and wants us to be able to see the real truth. Satan wants us questioning things, researching things, and making sure that things are the truth (including the fact that Satan is pxxxed at all those scumbags that destroyed ancient knowledge or locked it up in the vatican vaults to be used against us, binding us to accepting the xian lies). When they want you to reject blatant proof that the doctrine is wrong, even wrong according to their own LIE-ble (let alone wrong according to absolute truth), they are acting on behalf of joke-hova to help enslave that little group. And that group continues pouring psychic energy into the vatican via the washtowel, which the angels and joke-hova use to enslave mankind and bring on its Agends 21+.
-
Hello Wizard,
question, i've read about this 'idea' of Satan as liberator of wisdom. But this notion that the Vatican had the power to lock up some incredible 'knowledge' that satan wanted out in the open is a little odd. However, it is also VERY interesting.
Can u please expand on this?
thanks
recently i read some essays on animal behavorial patterns and i must say i'm shocked at how little difference (when you honestly consider it) there is between said animals and us, human beings.. this is a very new concept for me personally but here is my take on it (i'm sure its not so new, ex.
evolution) - what if humans in fact are mimicking animals, and not the other way around as we'd like to think.. displays of love and affection, clinginess, mourning etc, they all exist in the animal kingdom, but how are we so different?
a pack of wolves attack and kill a caribou for dinner and its considered nature, the same wolves hunt down a lost man in the woods and now its considered 'evil', and if there are any forest rangers around its guaranteed that they will shoot these wolves.. man's heartless treatment of man is considered 'evil', but if evolution is of any indication (in terms of survival of the fittest) is the 'term' evil just a word to appease our so called conscious?.
here is an better example,
on those essays the subject of a male lion came up. this lion had cubs and he proceeded to kill every single one of them supposedly in order to diminsh the chances that any of the cubs would grow and usurp the grown lion's position of dominance within the pride.
this is apparently very common in the animal kingdom (ex. gorillas etc.)
yet it's 'evil' for such things to happen among humans, why?
would humans not merely be reflecting the same 'nature' as its 'ecosystem' in which it simply lives in?? We ARE part of this EArth, after all, interacting and reacting with it and all. why does man want to differentiate itself from 'nature' when it's ovbious that it IS nature?
recently i read some essays on animal behavorial patterns and i must say i'm shocked at how little difference (when you honestly consider it) there is between said animals and us, human beings.. this is a very new concept for me personally but here is my take on it (i'm sure its not so new, ex.
evolution) - what if humans in fact are mimicking animals, and not the other way around as we'd like to think.. displays of love and affection, clinginess, mourning etc, they all exist in the animal kingdom, but how are we so different?
a pack of wolves attack and kill a caribou for dinner and its considered nature, the same wolves hunt down a lost man in the woods and now its considered 'evil', and if there are any forest rangers around its guaranteed that they will shoot these wolves.. man's heartless treatment of man is considered 'evil', but if evolution is of any indication (in terms of survival of the fittest) is the 'term' evil just a word to appease our so called conscious?.
Hello all,
Recently I read some essays on animal behavorial patterns and I must say I'm shocked at how little difference (when you HONESTLY consider it) there is between said animals and us, human beings.
This is a VERY new concept for me personally but here is my take on it (I'm sure its not so new, ex. evolution) - What if humans in fact are MIMICKING animals, and not the other way around as we'd like to think.
displays of love and affection, clinginess, mourning etc, they all exist in the animal kingdom, but how are we so different? and why would we think so?
a pack of wolves attack and kill a caribou for dinner and its considered nature, the same wolves hunt down a lost man in the woods and now its considered 'evil', and if there are any forest rangers around its guaranteed that they will shoot these wolves.
man's heartless treatment of man is considered 'evil', but if evolution is of any indication (in terms of survival of the fittest) is the 'term' evil just a word to appease our so called conscious?
on another thread wot i read a few days ago and can't remember which one, someone asked why josephus never mentions jesus .
at the time i had no knowledge of this so kept quiet .
however today while reading an excellent book (don't know if i should advertise but if anyone wants the title let me know ) i have found out that josephus mentions jesus in around about manner.
i remember reading somewhere in regards to a a 'prophet' of sorts who had predicted all the popes that have been chosen.. his 'prophecy' stated that the next pope (since benedict has resigned) would be the last before the 'end' would come.
his name would be pope peter.. let's see what happens.
we are suppose to know who the next pope will be before easter..
I remember reading somewhere in regards to a a 'prophet' of sorts who had predicted all the Popes that have been chosen.
His 'prophecy' stated that the next Pope (since Benedict has resigned) would be the last before the 'end' would come. His name would be Pope Peter.
Let's see what happens. We are suppose to know who the next Pope will be before easter.
on another thread i asked about this life being all there is.
if so, what would you consider important to have done or accomplished before you die so that 'your time alive' would not have been a total waste?.
if you haven't done it, or accomplished it, are you currently on a quest to do so?
jgnat
holy cow!! that is a fabulous painting!!
on another thread i asked about this life being all there is.
if so, what would you consider important to have done or accomplished before you die so that 'your time alive' would not have been a total waste?.
if you haven't done it, or accomplished it, are you currently on a quest to do so?
on the way out,
have you reached that inner peace or are you still working on it?
on another thread i asked about this life being all there is.
if so, what would you consider important to have done or accomplished before you die so that 'your time alive' would not have been a total waste?.
if you haven't done it, or accomplished it, are you currently on a quest to do so?