smiddy3, The writers thought resurrection would be a great proof for Messiahship hence they invented stories of people being resurrected, but they had no idea that the great genius Paul would come later and invent another doctrine that says one man's sin would make every one sinners and one man's death would make everyone righteous.
Posts by venus
-
31Silly Bible Stories we once believed
by RULES & REGULATIONS inthese bible stories are too silly to be true.
take off your rose colored glasses and you will begin to see some great imagination, exaggeration and great story telling!.
telling !.
-
-
venus
-
31
Silly Bible Stories we once believed
by RULES & REGULATIONS inthese bible stories are too silly to be true.
take off your rose colored glasses and you will begin to see some great imagination, exaggeration and great story telling!.
telling !.
-
-
venus
Look at the wisdom of the writer of "Lord's prayer." (Mathew 6:9-13)
* Let God's name be sanctified (redundant, His name is inherently and always holy)
* Lead us not into temptation (something God would never do)
* Give us our daily food (this is like a fish in the ocean seeking water--we are flooded with provisions for life's enjoyment--all fruits, seeds, grain ... in thousands of varieties)
* Forgive us our debts as we also have forgiven our debtors. (teaching God how to behave Himself)
-
31
Silly Bible Stories we once believed
by RULES & REGULATIONS inthese bible stories are too silly to be true.
take off your rose colored glasses and you will begin to see some great imagination, exaggeration and great story telling!.
telling !.
-
-
venus
Interestingly, Bible itself gives something that negates the rest of the things it says.
See what it says about how everyone would be judged. All nations—including atheists—would be judged according to humanitarian acts each one performed, not according to belief in any God. (Mathew 25:31-46)
In outlook and wisdom, Bible writers too are no different from Pope John Paul II who attributed his survival from assassin’s bullets to intervention by “Our Lady of Fatima.” See how he failed to wonder why “Our Lady of Fatima” didn't guide the assassin’s bullets to miss him altogether.
-
2
Whenever anyone claims to speak to you in the Name of GOD,simply reject them as Charlatans
by smiddy3 inall of the names attributed to the almighty god are nothing more than the inventions and imaginations of imperfect human beings.. their are only four hebrew letters that are attributed to god in the hebrew scriptures known as the tetragrammaton usually translated as jhvh or more accurately yhwh .. their is no tetragrammaton or it`s equivalent in the christian greek scriptures which can easily be attested to by looking at the kingdom interlinear of the christian greek scriptures of the new testament published by the wtb&ts a word for word translation of the greek text.. anything other than that is an addition of imperfect humans to put a name to those letters and not one that the creator has endorsed or verified with his stamp of approval to this day.. the wtb&ts published "aid to bible understanding" in their first edition they said words to the effect that the name jehovah was the most commonly used in christendom/the world ,so that was the name they adopted.. { it had nothing to do with divine revelation or a voice from god or holy spirit it was because it was the most popular use of that name in christendom }.
-
-
venus
Name Jehovah, associated with the myth of exodus, cannot be the real name. This is attested by the fact that Jesus profusely used the term “Father” instead of Jehovah.
If at all there is a name, it should stem from His most important act He regularly performs in large scale. According to Jesus, God “renews” the world whenever humans deplete/destroy the provisions for life’s enjoyment. (Mathew 19:28) Hence His name must do with this aspect—something like omnibenevolent which is hinted at throughout the Bible (Mark 10:18; Psalm 100:5; Psalm 145:17; 2 Peter 3:9 ….)
His love is unmistakably highlighted in Mathew 25:31-46 where it is shown that all nations—including atheists—are judged according to humanitarian acts each one performed, not according to belief in any God.
-
38
Analysis of 2017 vs 2016 Yearbook reports for Europe
by Splash inso these countries roughly constitute europe.. here's how well they did in 2017 vs 2016:.
2017 peak pubs.
2016 peak pubs.
-
-
venus
Signs are that JWs are all set to crash-land with a great scream (contrast Isaiah 60:22). Organization is to be renamed as TITANIC II
-
36
What could be other alternative names for the Jehovah's Witnesses ?
by Finkelstein inhow about .... the international brotherhood of stupidity.. the righteous zombies club .
-
-
venus
If the name is to explain the character of the entity, then the best name would be:
Let-us-take-the-speck-out-of-your eye-when-we-have-plank-in-our-eye.org.
-
48
Evolution doesn't happen today...WRONG...
by HowTheBibleWasCreated inlast year i had a brother tell me that one proof evolution is false is that he doesn't see it happening today... i was going to bring of viruses evolving so fast that new vaccines must be developed each year but felt he was too closed minded to receive it.
today i was listening to the audio book of 'an ancestors tale- richard dawkins' and noted oe point that shined through.. here is evolution happening>>>.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/evolution/library/05/2/l_052_05.html.
-
-
venus
The thread that runs through the details of Bible is evolution.
1) A nation believes that they are God’s chosen people and rest of the world is pagan. When the history unfolds, the so-called chosen people go under occupation by the so-called pagans. From this theological crisis, a new theology of a messiah (who would restore everything) is evolved.
2) When the Messiah did arrive, no restoration took place; rather Messiah himself was murdered. From this evolved another teaching that it was God’s will that Messiah should be murdered by sinners so that sinners can seek forgiveness on the basis of such a death.
3) Even about specific subject you can see such evolution. For example, resurrection of Jesus. Mark was written first, and he’s hardly got anything about the resurrection; Matthew comes next with little more information; and then toward the end of the century we get Luke and John, and then and only then do we find stories about Jesus eating broiled fish, cooking breakfast by the shore, inviting Thomas to touch him, and so on..And finally book of Acts saying about 40-day works of resurrected Jesus (See, just from one-verse resurrection from first gospel of Mark to 40 days post-resurrection works in Acts)
-
17
Uncovering "GOD"
by Doug Mason inwith self-righteous indignation, the watchtower society (wts) points to its restoration of the hebrew tetragram (hwhy = “yahweh” = = = > “jehovah”) wherever the english translator renders it as “lord”..
the wts complains that the use of “lord” hides the fact that the name (“jehovah” for the wts) is intended.
however, with its call of “look over here, look over here”, the wts diverts attention, probably unintentionally, from related information that it, in turn, does not reveal..
-
-
venus
Doug Mason
Very interesting and precious information--I have saved on to my computer.
For everything you have said here there is proof in Exodus 20:2-6 where He identifies himself as "the one who brought you out of Egypt, out of the land of slavery."
Then He goes on to say 'If you worship any other god or their images, I will punish you for 3-4 generation.'
Here God is depicted as though a human passionate romantic lover threatening his love. It doesn't befit the Supreme Ruler of the universe. The Supreme Father would not seek validation from his children because there is no need of it, and He knows what He is. True God would always speak in dispassion and disinterest because he would always give freedom to His children, and would want to see His children behaving like Him. Jesus correctly discerned this aspect of God in Mathew 5:44-48. Between the lines we can see God as though telling us: “Don’t worship me, but become worship-worthy by imitating sun which is a giver (of light and warmth) and never receives anything from any body [having no expectation from others]—a quality that has its source in God Himself. When you imitate qualities of sun, you become like your heavenly father.”
-
19
Will the Watchtower Corporation continue to lie and deceive just to sustain itself into the future ?
by Finkelstein inthe wts has been selling and promoting christ's return and the end times since the late 1800's, right through all of the 20th century and still continues today on the same core doctrinal premise.. 1914 was set as a year of christ taking position upon his heavenly throne followed by choosing the wts as his earthly guided organization in 1919 according to the wts.
leaders at that time.. the actual truth is that the wts is a publishing house and it was inherently pressed to make up doctrines which would gravitate attention to its published goods, accurate and honest bible interpretation was a second lesser concern.. the original heads of this religious publishing house (c t russell) first proclaimed that christ had returned in 1874 and 1914 was going to be the year jesus was going to cleanse the earth of all wickedness etc.
this was obviously a false doctrine tainted with ignorance and a bit of commercialization in reality.. so the question remains what will the wts do in the future, what will the wts do as far as doctrines to allure the general public at large ?
-
-
venus
1) A nation believes that they are God’s chosen people and rest of the world is pagan. When the history unfolds, the so-called chosen people go under occupation by the so-called pagans. From this theological crisis, a new theology of a messiah (who would restore everything) is evolved.
2) When the Messiah did arrive, no restoration took place; rather Messiah himself was murdered. From this evolved another teaching that it was God’s will that Messiah should be murdered by sinners so that sinners can seek forgiveness on the basis of such a death.
3) Even about specific subject you can see such evolution. For example, resurrection of Jesus. Mark was written first, and he’s hardly got anything about the resurrection; Matthew comes next with little more information; and then toward the end of the century we get Luke and John, and then and only then do we find stories about Jesus eating broiled fish, cooking breakfast by the shore, inviting Thomas to touch him, and so on..And finally book of Acts saying about 40-day works of resurrected Jesus
Since Bible itself sets the precedent for theological evolution, JWs would not have any problem in changing according to the time.
-
20
Sources of John's vivid imagery
by Doug Mason inin common with other apocalyptic writings, such as daniel and 1 enoch, john’s letter employs vivid, memorable imagery.
as with the other elements of his apocalypse (revelation), john draws on existing sources for his material.. meanings inferred from the images need to keep the following firmly in mind:.
1. the symbols had to have meaning for and be clearly understood by his immediate intended hearers.. 2. john intended that these images encourage those hearers to “overcome”, then and there.. 3. john anticipated that the coming of jesus was imminent, “soon”.. it is my belief that the images were intended to depict earthly opposition (rome and apostate jews) as well as heavenly opposition (wars in heaven involving satan).. the writers/compilers of daniel also employed vivid imagery.
-
-
venus
Doug Mason,
You know you exist because you think, perceive, plan, formulate logic, abstract reasoning etc which are not the characteristics of matter. Science does not discover the self; but it is the self that discovers science. You are an individual, and the word individual is from indivisible, Latin [in + dividuus “divisible”, from divido “divide”. Individual is all about your immaterial substratum on which body is sustained. This substratum is indivisible, minuter than the minutest, not composed of parts, cannot be destroyed. This applies to God who is also an individual made of qualities like we are. The only difference: among many individuals one would be Supreme because humans cannot say ‘no one superior to us exists.’ Supreme Soul would have supreme qualities, and would have a residence that matches His Supreme status.
God is individual, simple in composition, atom-sized, hence anthropomorphic representation of God is untruth. This is where all religions went wrong. Things such as imagery, symbols .. inadequate to explain the Supreme.