Blondie,
Maybe she meant that you used the 1995 WT Library CD-ROM?
--VM44
taken from our kingdom ministry, june 2001. .
basic requirements for bethel service.
- requirements for bethel service.
Blondie,
Maybe she meant that you used the 1995 WT Library CD-ROM?
--VM44
the public talk was entitled 'who are teaching all nations the truth?'..
quite a heady title you might think.
as you might expect the talk was weak in substance.
"No clergy/laity division"????
What about Elder/Publisher division?
--VM44
look at the cover of the 1927 edition of the finished mystery.
see what it says at the bottom?.
i say, false advertising!.
Look at the cover of the 1927 edition of THE FINISHED MYSTERY
See what it says at the bottom?
I say, FALSE ADVERTISING!
--VM44
these days it's pretty clear that the jw organization is running on autopilot.
charles taze.
russell, joe booze rutherford, nathan knorr and freddie franz all had a certain amount of vision.
Hi AlanF,
I remember reading that Rutherford was quoting Kipling when he
made the remark about women being a "bag of bones, and a hank
of hair"....He probably thought he was so cultured, quoting
Kipling like that.
Somebody should have given Rutherford a severe tongue lashing, for
speaking so disrespectfully of women. It appears that no one
around Rutherford had the nerve to do so. (except for Salter, and
Moyle, both of which got the boot from Brooklyn)
Well, I decided to look up the quote, first what "The Judge" said:
"A woman is nothing more than "a hank of hair and a bag of bones."
-- Speech given at a 1941 St. Louis, MO convention discouraging
marriage.
.... and here is the poem by Kipling:
THE VAMPIRE, by Rudyard Kipling
A FOOL there was and he made his prayer
(Even as you and I!)
To a rag and a bone and a hank of hair,
(We called her the woman who did not care),
But the fool he called her his lady fair
(Even as you and I!)
Oh, the years we waste and the tears we waste,
And the work of our head and hand
Belong to the wonwn who did not know
(And now we know that she never could know)
And did not understand!
A fool there was and his goods he spent,
(Even as you and I!)
Honour and faith and a sure intent
(And it wasn't the least what the lady meant),
But a fool must follow his natural bent
(Even as you and I!)
Oh, the toil we lost and the spoil we lost
And the exceuent things we planned
Belong to the woman who didn't know why
(And now we know that she never knew why)
And did not understand!
The fool was stripped to his foolish hide,
(Even as you and 1!)
Which she might have seen when she threw him aside
(But it isn't on record the lady tried)
So some of him lived but the most of him died
(Even as you and I!)
'And it isn't the shame and it isn't the blame
That stings like a white-hot brand-
It's coming to know that she never knew why
(Seeing, at last, she could never know why)
And never could understand!"
i seem to recall that on this summer's district assemblies there is an experience given about a woman who was involved in various voluntary community services, but quit them and became a pioneer.
does anyone remember this?
if so, can anyone provide more solid documentation?.
How old is AlanF, btw?
give him his fucking plane!!!!!!!
john leonard is taking his pepsi challenge to court.
the 21-year old business student says he's collected his pepsi points and wants his prize - a harrier fighter jet like the one pictured in a pepsi promotional tv ad.
Here is a PDF file from a law school containing
the Judge's decision:
I like the part where the Judge explains "why the commercial is funny"
[ http://www.law.pitt.edu/madison/contracts/leonard_v_pepsico.pdf]
--VM44
*** w96 9/1 20 living by the law of the christ ***.
*** w96 9/1 21 living by the law of the christ ***.
it is all just suggestions:.
Great post Norm,
It appears that learning Klingon is also specifically frowned upon.
From the Dec 8, 1995 Awake! article "A Look at Today's Science Fiction".
First, they say there is no need to be judgmental:
"Some may decide that they prefer other forms of reading and entertainment.
But there is no need for such ones to be judgmental of others in this regard
or to make issues over matters of personal choice.-Romans 14:4."
unless you are learning Klingon, which the author of the article feels
is too extreme!
"According to Time magazine, Star Trek fans on five continents have devoted
themselves to learning the fictitious language Klingon, which was featured in
Star Trek TV shows and movies. Such extreme behavior does not harmonize
with the Bible's counsel at 1 Peter 1:13: "Keep your senses completely
["keep balanced," footnote]."
I wonder if what bothered the writer is the fact that Klingon is a made-up
language, rather than a real language, probably wouldn't like Esperanto
either.
--VM44
to this day some have claimed that rutherford was buried secretly at beth-sarim or beth-shan anyway, even though the society has stated in print that rutherford's remains were sent to brooklyn for burial.. .
i remember/read somewhere that he was buried at staten island, new york.
can anyone confirm that?
Farkel,
I don't think Beth-Shan exists anymore. Perhaps the bomb shelter under
the "goat's barn" might still exist.
Details when Beth-Shan was demolished might be in the book,
"Jehovah's Witnesses: Their Monuments to False Prophecy"
A good online article is at:
http://www.premier1.net/~raines/bethshan.html
--VM44
to this day some have claimed that rutherford was buried secretly at beth-sarim or beth-shan anyway, even though the society has stated in print that rutherford's remains were sent to brooklyn for burial.. .
i remember/read somewhere that he was buried at staten island, new york.
can anyone confirm that?
JanG,
Len Chretien was ripped off? What happened?
The movie has been around for quite some time, and still is available for
purchase. I thought he would have at least broke even by now.
--VM44
to this day some have claimed that rutherford was buried secretly at beth-sarim or beth-shan anyway, even though the society has stated in print that rutherford's remains were sent to brooklyn for burial.. .
i remember/read somewhere that he was buried at staten island, new york.
can anyone confirm that?
Oops!
Farkel wanted the exact address for Beth Shan! Not Beth Sarim!
The exact address where Beth Shan used to be is probably in the book
by Gruss and Chretien.
If I recall correctly, Beth Shan was in Mission Valley, while Beth Sarim is
located on a hilltop, or plateau, in the Kensington area of San Diego. The
house does overlook Mission Valley, so one might have been able to
see Beth Shan from Beth Sarim.
--VM44