Now...................as to the "older publications". If there is no newer publication on the subject matter, then the elders are bound to use the older publications as their reference point.
The reasoning? Well, there's been no New Light - so the old publication must be the Current Light.
Been up against that one before.
Hey Swan,
I think the only thing this old article shows is the consistency of the WTBTS toward women as victims and keeping them truly in the dark about what will happen to them in a JC.
Naaaaaaaaaaa, I think the WTBTS's view of women is that they were created inferior to men, ate The Fruit, caused The Downfall of Adam.............and entice men into raping them.
Thus, the women make themselves victims. Of course, this WT thinking has progressed over the years....in some areas.
Btw, you do know that the WTBTS changed the Old Light of screaming during a rape? Well, new, old, new, old, new, old, new, old. I think about 11/12 or more times. A woman could get df'd or not depending upon which year she was raped.
The women who failed to scream during the Not OK Not To Scream years? Well, they were never re-instated because of the WTBTS changing doctrine. Why? Because they THOUGHT they were sinning, so therefore, they were. (The WTBTS is never wrong on a doctrine.)
Btw, the Catholic Church uses this identical thinking for sinning. If you THINK you sinned - you did. Therefore, even when it's not a sin.......it's a sin.
waiting